<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JSurg &#187; Surgical Endoscopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jsurg.com/blog/category/surgical-endoscopy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jsurg.com</link>
	<description>{ JournAll of Surgery }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic laser fragmentation and removal of a nonremovable metal esophageal stent for persistent dysphagia: a technical note.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-laser-fragmentation-and-removal-of-a-nonremovable-metal-esophageal-stent-for-persistent-dysphagia-a-technical-note/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-laser-fragmentation-and-removal-of-a-nonremovable-metal-esophageal-stent-for-persistent-dysphagia-a-technical-note/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Endoscopic laser fragmentation and removal of a nonremovable metal esophageal stent for persistent dysphagia: a technical note.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Coomber RS, Patel PH, Dhir A, Livingstone JI
        Abstract
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Endoscopic laser fragmentation and removal of a nonremovable metal esophageal stent for persistent dysphagia: a technical note.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Coomber RS, Patel PH, Dhir A, Livingstone JI</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Self-expanding metal stents are widely used in the palliation of esophageal diseases (Todd, N Engl J Med 344(22):1681-1687, 2001). The majority are inserted for end-stage malignancy and are not designed to be removed.                                         METHODS:                       We report the first recorded successful endoscopic removal of an &#8220;irremovable&#8221; stent by laser fragmentation after its placement became redundant. A 72-year-old man who had persistent dysphagia after esophageal stent insertion for Boerhaave&#8217;s syndrome had his stent removed by Nd-YAG laser fragmentation at staged endoscopies.                                         RESULTS:                       The stent was removed in its entirety and the patients&#8217; symptoms resolved.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       We describe a successful technique for the removal of a nonretrievable stent using laser fracture and endoscopic retrieval. This method of stent removal has not been previously reported.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22302532 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-laser-fragmentation-and-removal-of-a-nonremovable-metal-esophageal-stent-for-persistent-dysphagia-a-technical-note/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/randomized-controlled-trial-of-laparoscopic-gastric-ischemic-conditioning-prior-to-minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-the-logic-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/randomized-controlled-trial-of-laparoscopic-gastric-ischemic-conditioning-prior-to-minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-the-logic-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Veeramootoo D, Shore AC, Wajed SA
        Abstract
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Veeramootoo D, Shore AC, Wajed SA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION:                       Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a viable alternative to open resection for the management of esophagogastric cancer. However, the technique may relate to a higher incidence of ischemia-related gastric conduit complications. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning (LIC) by ligating the left gastric vessels 2 weeks before MIE may have a protective role, possibly through an improvement of conduit perfusion. This project was designed to evaluate whether LIC influenced ultimate conduit perfusion.                                         METHODS:                       A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare MIE with LIC (L) against MIE without (N). The project began in May 2009 and was offered to consecutive patients with the objective of recruiting 22 in each arm. Sample size calculations were based on data from previous clinical series. The main outcome measure was perfusion recorded by validated laser Doppler fluximetry, at the fundus (F) and greater curve (G); performed at routine staging laparoscopy and every stage of an MIE. A perfusion coefficient measured as ratio at stage of MIE over baseline was used for statistical analysis.                                         RESULTS:                       Sixteen patients were recruited before an interim analysis of the trial data. At staging laparoscopy perfusion at F was higher than at G (p = 0.016). In the L cohort, an apparent rise in perfusion at G is observed post intervention (p = 0.176). At MIE, baseline perfusion is comparable for both arms; however, a significant drop is observed at both locations once the stomach is mobilized and exteriorized (p = 0.001). Once delivered at the neck, perfusion coefficient is approximately 38% of baseline levels. However, there was no discernible difference between the L (38.3 ± 12) and N (37.7 ± 16.8) cohorts (p = 0.798).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       LIC does not translate into an improved perfusion of the gastric conduit tip. The benefits reported from published clinical series suggest that the resistance of the conduit to ischemia occurs through alternative possibly microcellular mechanisms.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22302533 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/randomized-controlled-trial-of-laparoscopic-gastric-ischemic-conditioning-prior-to-minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-the-logic-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The use of novel hemostatic sealant (Tisseel(®)) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a case-control study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-use-of-novel-hemostatic-sealant-tisseel%c2%ae-in-laparoscopic-myomectomy-a-case-control-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-use-of-novel-hemostatic-sealant-tisseel%c2%ae-in-laparoscopic-myomectomy-a-case-control-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The use of novel hemostatic sealant (Tisseel(®)) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a case-control study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Angioli R, Plotti F, Ricciardi R, Terranova C, Zullo MA, Damiani P, Montera R, Guzzo F, Sc...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The use of novel hemostatic sealant (Tisseel(®)) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a case-control study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Angioli R, Plotti F, Ricciardi R, Terranova C, Zullo MA, Damiani P, Montera R, Guzzo F, Scaletta G, Muzii L</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       This is the first case-control study on the use of a fibrin sealant (Tisseel(®)) on uterine suture during laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), with the primary endpoint to evaluate the intraoperative bleeding and postoperative blood loss. In addition, we evaluated the time required to achieve hemostasis using Tisseel(®) and how much it can influence operative time.                                         METHODS:                       From December 2009 to January 2011, consecutive patients older than 18 years with symptomatic isolate intramural myoma with maximal diameter ≤6 cm and ≥4 cm and with a sonographically diagnosed free myometrium margin ≥0.5 cm were included in the study. We selected from our institute&#8217;s database a group of consecutive patients with homogeneous features of the study group, who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy without Tisseel(®) application.                                         RESULTS:                       Fifteen women with symptomatic myoma were enrolled in the study (group A). Regarding the control group (group B), we selected a homogenous group of 15 patients with the same preoperative characteristics of the study group. Mean operative time was 47.7 min and 62.1 min, for groups A and B respectively (p &lt; 0.05). Mean time required to achieve complete haemostasis was 195.5 s in group A and 361.8 in control group B (p &lt; 0.0001). Mean estimated blood loss was 111.3 mL and 230 mL in groups A and B, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). Mean hemoglobin decrease was 1.36 g/dL and 2.04 g/dL in groups A and B, respectively (p &lt; 0.05).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The use of Tisseel(®) during LM may represent a valid alternative solution for obtaining hemostasis, reducing intra- and postoperative bleeding. Furthermore, it may help the surgeon to obtain a rapid healing of the injured surfaces, probably reducing the use of electrocoagulation and traumatisms.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22302534 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-use-of-novel-hemostatic-sealant-tisseel%c2%ae-in-laparoscopic-myomectomy-a-case-control-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The optimal strategy for proximal mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse: an ex vivo study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-optimal-strategy-for-proximal-mesh-fixation-during-laparoscopic-ventral-rectopexy-for-rectal-prolapse-an-ex-vivo-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-optimal-strategy-for-proximal-mesh-fixation-during-laparoscopic-ventral-rectopexy-for-rectal-prolapse-an-ex-vivo-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The optimal strategy for proximal mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse: an ex vivo study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Formijne Jonkers HA, van de Haar HJ, Draaisma WA, Heggelman BG, C...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The optimal strategy for proximal mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse: an ex vivo study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Formijne Jonkers HA, van de Haar HJ, Draaisma WA, Heggelman BG, Consten EC, Broeders IA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) is an established technique for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Several techniques and devices can be used for proximal mesh fixation on the sacral promontory during this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation strength of a recently introduced screw for mesh fixation on the promontory during LVR with two other frequently used techniques.                                         METHODS:                       An ex vivo experimental model using a porcine spinal column was designed to measure the strength of proximal mesh fixation. In a laparoscopic box trainer, a polypropylene mesh was anchored on the spinal column using three different fixation methods, i.e., the Protack 5-mm tacker device, Ethibond Excel 2-0 stitches, and the Karl Storz screw. Subsequently, increasing traction was applied to the mesh. This traction was applied at a standardized angle as determined by measuring the mean angle between the site of distal mesh fixation on the rectum and a line straight through the sacral promontory on 12 random dynamic MR scans of the pelvic floor after the LVR procedure. The applied force was measured at the moment that the fixation broke, using a calibrated electronic Newton meter. All fixation methods were tested ten times.                                         RESULTS:                       The mean angle, as measured on the MR scans, was 100°. The mean disruption force, which led to a break of the proximal mesh fixation, was 58 N for the three Protack tacks, 55 N for the two stitches, and 70 N for the new screw. The use of a screw therefore led to a significantly stronger fixation compared to the use of stitches (p ≤ 0.05). No significant difference was determined between the tacks and the screw fixation and between the tacks and the stitches fixation.                                         CONCLUSION:                       The new screw for proximal mesh fixation during LVR procedures offers similar fixation strength when compared to tacks. The use of one screw for proximal mesh fixation is therefore a reasonable alternative to the use of several tacks or sutures.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22302535 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-optimal-strategy-for-proximal-mesh-fixation-during-laparoscopic-ventral-rectopexy-for-rectal-prolapse-an-ex-vivo-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The burden of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with the patient under conscious sedation.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-burden-of-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-ercp-performed-with-the-patient-under-conscious-sedation/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-burden-of-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-ercp-performed-with-the-patient-under-conscious-sedation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The burden of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with the patient under conscious sedation.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD
        Abstract
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The burden of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with the patient under conscious sedation.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure that proves burdensome to patients. Nevertheless, very little data are available on patient tolerance of this procedure that may improve practice guidelines and could aid in decreasing the burden of ERCP. This study therefore investigated the burden of ERCP performed with the patient under conscious sedation.                                         METHODS:                       Consecutive patients receiving ERCP under conscious sedation between November 2007 and December 2008 at the University Medical Center Utrecht and Erasmus MC Rotterdam (The Netherlands) were asked to participate in this study. The patients completed questionnaires on demographics, medical history, burden of ERCP (mental health, discomfort, and pain), symptoms and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), including the EQ-VAS (lower EQ-5D scores and higher EQ-VAS scores represent a better quality of life). The paired t-test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression were used to evaluate the results.                                         RESULTS:                       The questionnaire was returned by 149 (54%) of 276 eligible patients, 139 of whom completed the entire questionnaire (54% males; mean age, 60 ± 14 years). Throat ache (p &lt; 0.001) was the only symptom higher than baseline value 1 day after the ERCP. On day 1, about one-tenth of the patients experienced moderate to severe mental health problems, which were associated with a higher EQ-5D score before ERCP (p = 0.01). Slightly fewer than half of the patients experienced pain and discomfort during and immediately after ERCP. More discomfort was experienced by patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP (p &lt; 0.05) and those with a higher EQ-5D score (p &lt; 0.001) or lower VAS (p &lt; 0.01). Pain was associated with younger age (p &lt; 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (p &lt; 0.001), and lower VAS (p &lt; 0.01).                                         CONCLUSION:                       One-third to one-half of patients experience pain and discomfort during and immediately after ERCP when it is performed with conscious sedation for the patient. Other sedation strategies, such as the use of general anesthesia or propofol, may well reduce the burden of ERCP, particularly for patients with a higher EQ-5D score, younger age, or therapeutic ERCP treatment. However, randomized trials are warranted.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22302536 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-burden-of-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-ercp-performed-with-the-patient-under-conscious-sedation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparable early changes in gastrointestinal hormones after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-En-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbidly obese type 2 diabetic subjects.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparable-early-changes-in-gastrointestinal-hormones-after-sleeve-gastrectomy-and-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-surgery-for-morbidly-obese-type-2-diabetic-subjects/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparable-early-changes-in-gastrointestinal-hormones-after-sleeve-gastrectomy-and-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-surgery-for-morbidly-obese-type-2-diabetic-subjects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Comparable early changes in gastrointestinal hormones after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-En-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbidly obese type 2 diabetic subjects.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Romero F, Nicolau J, Flores L...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Comparable early changes in gastrointestinal hormones after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-En-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbidly obese type 2 diabetic subjects.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Romero F, Nicolau J, Flores L, Casamitjana R, Ibarzabal A, Lacy A, Vidal J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) are associated with similar type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) resolution rates for morbidly obese subjects. However, the mechanisms underlying the resolution of T2DM after SG have not been clarified to date. This study aimed to compare the early changes in gastrointestinal hormones involved in insulin and glucagon secretion in morbidly obese T2DM subjects undergoing SG or RYGBP.                                         METHODS:                       This prospective study investigated 12 subjects with T2DM who had undergone SG (n = 6) or RYGBP (n = 6). Five body mass index (BMI)-matched obese non-diabetic subjects and five BMI-matched obese diabetic subjects served as control subjects. Glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and GLP-2 were determined after a standardized mixed liquid meal before surgery and 6 weeks afterward.                                         RESULTS:                       After 6 weeks, five of the six subjects in each surgical group presented with T2DM remission, although the area under the curve (AUC)(0-120) of glucose was greater than that of the non-diabetic control subjects (P &lt; 0.01). Postsurgically, the indices of insulin and glucagon secretion were comparable between the two surgical groups. The AUC(0-120) of GLP-1 (P &lt; 0.05) and GLP-2 (P &lt; 0.05) was significantly and comparably enlarged after SG and RYGB. The postsurgical GIP response was significantly associated with the glucagon response throughout the meal test (ρ = 0.747; P &lt; 0.01).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The data show that in a cohort of morbidly obese T2DM subjects, SG and RYGBP are associated with an early improvement in glucose tolerance, similar changes in insulin and glucagon secretion, and a similar GLP-1, GIP, and GLP-2 response to a standardized mixed liquid meal.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22302537 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparable-early-changes-in-gastrointestinal-hormones-after-sleeve-gastrectomy-and-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-surgery-for-morbidly-obese-type-2-diabetic-subjects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer:  a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-intrathoracic-anastomosis-after-ivor-lewis-esophagectomy-for-cancer-a-review-of-transoral-or-transthoracic-use-of-staplers/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-intrathoracic-anastomosis-after-ivor-lewis-esophagectomy-for-cancer-a-review-of-transoral-or-transthoracic-use-of-staplers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer:  a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;
        Authors:  Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJ, Gisbertz SS,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer:  a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;</p>
<p>Authors:  Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJ, Gisbertz SS, Turrado Rodriguez V, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is one of the approaches used worldwide for treating esophageal cancer. Optimization of this approach and especially identifying the ideal intrathoracic anastomosis technique is needed. To date, different types of anastomosis have been described. A literature search on the current techniques and approaches for intrathoracic anastomosis was held. The studies were evaluated on leakage and stenosis rate of the anastomosis.                                         METHODS:                       The PubMed electronic database was used for comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers.                                         RESULTS:                       Twelve studies were included in this review. The most frequent applied technique was the stapled anastomosis. Stapled anastomoses can be divided into a transthoracic or a transoral introduction. This stapled approach can be performed with a circular or linear stapler. The reported anastomotic leakage rate ranges from 0 to 10%. The reported anastomotic stenosis rate ranges from 0 to 27.5%.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This review has found no important differences between the two most frequently used stapled anastomoses: the transoral introduction of the anvil and the transthoracic. Clinical trials are needed to compare different methods to improve the quality of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22294057 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-intrathoracic-anastomosis-after-ivor-lewis-esophagectomy-for-cancer-a-review-of-transoral-or-transthoracic-use-of-staplers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a new educational model using specially embalmed human anatomical specimen.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/training-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-a-new-educational-model-using-specially-embalmed-human-anatomical-specimen/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/training-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-a-new-educational-model-using-specially-embalmed-human-anatomical-specimen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a new educational model using specially embalmed human anatomical specimen.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 28;
        Authors:  Slieker JC, Theeuwes HP, van Rooijen GL, Lange JF, Kleinrensink GJ
 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a new educational model using specially embalmed human anatomical specimen.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 28;</p>
<p>Authors:  Slieker JC, Theeuwes HP, van Rooijen GL, Lange JF, Kleinrensink GJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       With an increasing percentage of colorectal resections performed laparoscopically nowadays, there is more emphasis on training &#8220;before the job&#8221; on operative skills, including the comprehension of specific laparoscopic surgical anatomy. As integration of technical skills with correct interpretation of the anatomical image must be incorporated in laparoscopic training, a human specimen training model with special emphasis on surgical anatomy was developed.                                         METHODS:                       The new embalming method Anubifix(™) combines long-term high-quality embalming of human bodies with almost normal flexibility and plasticity, and the body can be kept operational as long as conventionally embalmed human specimens. A colorectal training model was created in a specimen in which anatomical landmarks of colorectal anatomy were permanently colored to explore laparoscopic colorectal anatomy in a skills training setting. Airtight closure of the abdominal wall permits the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Residents were asked to test the model by mobilizing the small and large bowels and expose the central vessels and ureters. Afterward they were asked to fill out an eight-item questionnaire about the model.                                         RESULTS:                       Eleven surgical residents in their first and second year of training participated. Responses to the questionnaire showed that a majority of residents considered the model to be representative of the real situation and superior to animal models or virtual reality simulators, and helped to improve the knowledge of three-dimensional anatomy and laparoscopic skills.                                         CONCLUSION:                       The new training model for laparoscopic colorectal surgery proved to be a high-quality tool, concentrating on laparoscopic colorectal anatomy in a skills training setting. We believe it may be a valuable adjunct to residency training programs based on the principle of &#8220;training before the job.&#8221;<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22286275 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/training-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-a-new-educational-model-using-specially-embalmed-human-anatomical-specimen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic-laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to appendectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/educational-and-training-aspects-of-new-surgical-techniques-experience-with-the-endoscopic-laparoscopic-interdisciplinary-training-entity-elite-model-in-training-for-a-natural-orifice-translumenal/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/educational-and-training-aspects-of-new-surgical-techniques-experience-with-the-endoscopic-laparoscopic-interdisciplinary-training-entity-elite-model-in-training-for-a-natural-orifice-translumenal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic-laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to ap...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic-laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to appendectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 28;</p>
<p>Authors:  Gillen S, Gröne J, Knödgen F, Wolf P, Meyer M, Friess H, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP, Feussner H, Lehmann KS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new surgical concept that requires training before it is introduced into clinical practice. The endoscopic-laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) is a training model for NOTES interventions. The latest research has concentrated on new materials for organs with realistic optical and haptic characteristics and the possibility of high-frequency dissection. This study aimed to assess both the ELITE model in a surgical training course and the construct validity of a newly developed NOTES appendectomy scenario.                                         METHODS:                       The 70 attendees of the 2010 Practical Course for Visceral Surgery (Warnemuende, Germany) took part in the study and performed a NOTES appendectomy via a transsigmoidal access. The primary end point was the total time required for the appendectomy, including retrieval of the appendix. Subjective evaluation of the model was performed using a questionnaire. Subgroups were analyzed according to laparoscopic and endoscopic experience.                                         RESULTS:                       The participants with endoscopic or laparoscopic experience completed the task significantly faster than the inexperienced participants (p = 0.009 and 0.019, respectively). Endoscopic experience was the strongest influencing factor, whereas laparoscopic experience had limited impact on the participants with previous endoscopic experience. As shown by the findings, 87.3% of the participants stated that the ELITE model was suitable for the NOTES training scenario, and 88.7% found the newly developed model anatomically realistic.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This study was able to establish face and construct validity for the ELITE model with a large group of surgeons. The ELITE model seems to be well suited for the training of NOTES as a new surgical technique in an established gastrointestinal surgery skills course.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22286276 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/educational-and-training-aspects-of-new-surgical-techniques-experience-with-the-endoscopic-laparoscopic-interdisciplinary-training-entity-elite-model-in-training-for-a-natural-orifice-translumenal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/can-both-residents-and-chief-physicians-assess-surgical-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/can-both-residents-and-chief-physicians-assess-surgical-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 20;
        Authors:  Oestergaard J, Larsen CR, Maagaard M, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:             ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 20;</p>
<p>Authors:  Oestergaard J, Larsen CR, Maagaard M, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       It is known that structured assessment of an operation can provide trainees with useful knowledge and potentially shorten their learning curve. However, methods for objective assessment have not been widely adopted into the clinical setting. This might be because of a lack of expertise using an assessment tool. The aim of this present study was to investigate if a validated laparoscopic procedure-specific assessment tool could be used by doctors with different levels of experience.                                         METHODS:                       The study was conducted as an observer-blinded, prospective cohort study. Three video recordings of a right-side laparoscopic salpingectomy were distributed to ten chief physicians, eight residents (fourth year trainees), and two expert assessors (all in gynecology) in order to be assessed using a validated procedure-specific assessment tool. The three salpingectomies were selected because they easily showed the different operational levels: novice, intermediate, and expert. The two expert assessors, i.e., our gold standard, were familiar with the OSA-LS assessment scale, but the chief physicians and the residents were not. All participants were blinded to the fact that surgeons with different experience had performed the salpingectomies.                                         RESULTS:                       No significant differences between the residents and chief physicians were observed in any of the three assessed operations: novice, p = 0.63; intermediate, p = 0.93; and expert, p = 0.93. The chief physicians and residents matched our gold standard in assessing the intermediate operation (p = 0.177), but not the novice operation (p = 0.005) or the expert operation (p = 0.001).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Residents and chief physicians generated similar performance scores when assessing operations using a laparoscopic procedure-specific assessment scale, and they could distinguish performance levels between the surgeons. They matched the assessment score of our expert on the intermediate operation. We conclude that a procedure-specific assessment scale can be used by both residents and chief physicians when giving formative feedback.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22271335 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/can-both-residents-and-chief-physicians-assess-surgical-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgical techniques of laparoscopic peritonectomy plus paraaortic lymph node dissection for the treatment of patients with positive lymph node metastasis and peritoneal seeding from rectosigmoid cancer.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/surgical-techniques-of-laparoscopic-peritonectomy-plus-paraaortic-lymph-node-dissection-for-the-treatment-of-patients-with-positive-lymph-node-metastasis-and-peritoneal-seeding-from-rectosigmoid-cance/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/surgical-techniques-of-laparoscopic-peritonectomy-plus-paraaortic-lymph-node-dissection-for-the-treatment-of-patients-with-positive-lymph-node-metastasis-and-peritoneal-seeding-from-rectosigmoid-cance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Surgical techniques of laparoscopic peritonectomy plus paraaortic lymph node dissection for the treatment of patients with positive lymph node metastasis and peritoneal seeding from rectosigmoid cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 20;
    ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Surgical techniques of laparoscopic peritonectomy plus paraaortic lymph node dissection for the treatment of patients with positive lymph node metastasis and peritoneal seeding from rectosigmoid cancer.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 20;</p>
<p>Authors:  Liang JT</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       This multimedia article demonstrates the surgical techniques of laparoscopic pelvic peritonectomy plus aggressive lymph node dissection over the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava for the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer.                                         METHODS:                       The surgical procedures are detailed in the attached video.                                         RESULTS:                       This study enrolled 17 patients. All the patients successfully underwent surgery by the described surgical technique and had a zero conversion rate, an acceptable operation time (median 284 min, range 240-360 min), and moderate blood loss (median 294 ml, range 140-740 ml) through five small wounds (four 1-cm wounds for 5-12-mm abdominal ports and one 5-cm wound for tumor retrieval). The number of dissected lymph nodes was adequate (median 44, range 32-68). The operative complications represented 29.4% of all cases including anastomotic leakage in two cases, wound infection in two cases, and urinary retention followed by repeated urinary tract infection in one case. The patients had quick functional recovery, as evaluated by the length of the postoperative ileus (median 72 h, range 36-144 h), the hospital stay (median 14 days, range 12-28 days), and the degree of postoperative pain (visual analog scale median 4.0, range 3-6).                                         CONCLUSION:                       Laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely for rectosigmoid cancer patients with pelvic peritoneal seeding and extensive abdominal paraaortic lymph node metastases requiring an extended abdomino-iliac lymphadenectomy plus curative pelvic peritonectomy.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22271336 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/surgical-techniques-of-laparoscopic-peritonectomy-plus-paraaortic-lymph-node-dissection-for-the-treatment-of-patients-with-positive-lymph-node-metastasis-and-peritoneal-seeding-from-rectosigmoid-cance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of preoperative and surgical measurements of Zenker&#8217;s diverticulum.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-preoperative-and-surgical-measurements-of-zenkers-diverticulum/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-preoperative-and-surgical-measurements-of-zenkers-diverticulum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Comparison of preoperative and surgical measurements of Zenker's diverticulum.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 25;
        Authors:  Pomerri F, Costantini M, Dal Bosco C, Battaglia G, Bottin R, Zanatta L, Ancona E, Muzzio PC
        Abstract
 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Comparison of preoperative and surgical measurements of Zenker&#8217;s diverticulum.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 25;</p>
<p>Authors:  Pomerri F, Costantini M, Dal Bosco C, Battaglia G, Bottin R, Zanatta L, Ancona E, Muzzio PC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Zenker&#8217;s diverticulum (ZD) may be treated with a variety of endoscopic or open surgical techniques; the choice of treatment depends partly on the size of the diverticulum. The purpose of this study was to correlate ZD measurements obtained preoperatively and during surgery.                                         METHODS:                       From March 2006 to November 2008, 20 consecutive patients (19 males; median age 64.5 (range 37-88) years) with dysphagia secondary to ZD were enrolled for this study. All patients had preoperative barium radiography of the pharynx and esophagus, and diagnostic endoscopy. Ten patients underwent transoral stapling diverticulostomy and ten had open surgery. The depth of the ZD was measured on radiographic views, at endoscopy and during surgery, focusing on the distance from the top of the septum to the bottom of the pouch. The ZD dimensions obtained radiologically and endoscopically were compared with those found during surgery. Correlations and agreements between measurements were assessed using Pearson&#8217;s correlation coefficients and method-comparison analysis, respectively.                                         RESULTS:                       The median depth of the ZD was 2.9 cm (mean 2.95 ± 1.12 cm; range 1.5-6 cm), 3.0 cm (mean 3.24 ± 1.27 cm; range 1.7-6.8 cm), and 3.0 cm (mean 2.99 ± 1.01 cm; range 1.5-6 cm) when measured during surgery, radiology, and endoscopy, respectively. The correlation and agreement between the radiographic and surgical ZD measurements were good, whereas those between the endoscopic and surgical measurements were poor.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       These findings confirm that preoperative barium radiography is mandatory in order to choose the most appropriate surgical treatment for ZD.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22274927 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-preoperative-and-surgical-measurements-of-zenkers-diverticulum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/use-of-mesh-for-hiatal-hernia-repair-a-survey-of-sages-members/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/use-of-mesh-for-hiatal-hernia-repair-a-survey-of-sages-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 25;
        Authors:  Pfluke JM, Parker M, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ, Daniel Smith C
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                       Mesh use...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 25;</p>
<p>Authors:  Pfluke JM, Parker M, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ, Daniel Smith C</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Mesh use during hiatal hernia repair (HHR) has been suggested to be safe and effective. Concern has been raised about the risk of mesh-related complications, and the higher risk of complications if revisional hiatal surgery is undertaken after mesh has been used. Available data have not established a clear role for mesh in HHR. To assess surgeons&#8217; adoption of the use of mesh for HHR, SAGES members were surveyed regarding their practice related to mesh use for HHR.                                         METHODS:                       Between April and September 2010, an internet-based survey tool was used to survey SAGES members. Potential participants were contacted via e-mail and invited to complete the survey. Of the 5,323 attempted contacts, 5,024 reached active e-mail accounts. From these, 2,518 members responded (50% response rate).                                         RESULTS:                       The majority of respondents currently perform HHR (69%), but only 18% perform more than 20 per year. Of those who perform HHR, 94% use a laparoscopic approach for the majority of repairs. Whereas 25% of surgeons use mesh for the majority of repairs, 23% of surgeons never use mesh. When mesh is used, an absorbable mesh is most commonly used (67%). An onlay technique is used by 93% of respondents. Only 7% of surgeons who have been in practice more than 20 years use mesh compared with 59% of surgeons in practice less than 10 years. Fifty-seven percent of surgeons have never performed revisional foregut surgery on a patient with prior mesh.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Although the majority of surgeons have used mesh for HHR, it is the minority who use it routinely, with younger surgeons more likely to use mesh than older surgeons. Absorbable mesh is most commonly used. When mesh is used, an onlay technique is most commonly used. There is no clear accepted use of mesh in hiatal hernia repair.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22274928 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/use-of-mesh-for-hiatal-hernia-repair-a-survey-of-sages-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Challenging a classic myth: pneumoperitoneum associated with acute diverticulitis is not an indication for open or laparoscopic emergency surgery in hemodynamically stable patients. A 10-year experience with a nonoperative treatment.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/challenging-a-classic-myth-pneumoperitoneum-associated-with-acute-diverticulitis-is-not-an-indication-for-open-or-laparoscopic-emergency-surgery-in-hemodynamically-stable-patients-a-10-year-experien/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/challenging-a-classic-myth-pneumoperitoneum-associated-with-acute-diverticulitis-is-not-an-indication-for-open-or-laparoscopic-emergency-surgery-in-hemodynamically-stable-patients-a-10-year-experien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Challenging a classic myth: pneumoperitoneum associated with acute diverticulitis is not an indication for open or laparoscopic emergency surgery in hemodynamically stable patients. A 10-year experience with a nonoperative treatment.
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Challenging a classic myth: pneumoperitoneum associated with acute diverticulitis is not an indication for open or laparoscopic emergency surgery in hemodynamically stable patients. A 10-year experience with a nonoperative treatment.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 25;</p>
<p>Authors:  Costi R, Cauchy F, Le Bian A, Honart JF, Creuze N, Smadja C</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       In patients presenting with acute diverticulitis (AD) and signs of acute peritonitis, the presence of extradigestive air (EDA) on a computer tomography (CT) scan is often considered to indicate the need for emergency surgery. Although the traditional management of &#8220;perforated&#8221; AD is open sigmoidectomy, more recently, laparoscopic drainage/lavage (usually followed by delayed elective sigmoidectomy) has been reported. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of nonoperative management of emergency patients presenting with AD and EDA.                                         METHODS:                       The outcomes of 39 consecutive hemodynamically stable patients (23 men, mean age = 54.7 years) who were admitted with AD and EDA and were managed nonoperatively (antibiotic and supportive treatment) at a tertiary-care university hospital between January 2001 and June 2010 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. These included morbidity (Clavien-Dindo) and treatment failure (need for emergency surgery or death). A univariate analysis of clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria with respect to treatment failure was performed. Results of delayed elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy were also analyzed.                                         RESULTS:                       There was no mortality. Thirty-six of the 39 patients (92.3%) did not need surgery (7 patients required CT-guided abscess drainage). Mean hospital stay was 8.1 days. Duration of symptoms, previous antibiotic administration, severe sepsis, PCR level, WBC concentration, and the presence of abdominal collection were associated with treatment failure, whereas &#8220;distant&#8221; location of EDA and free abdominal fluid were not. Five patients had recurrence of AD and were treated medically. Seventeen patients (47.2%) underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for which mean operative time was 246 min (range = 100-450) and the conversion rate was 11.8%. Mortality was nil and the morbidity rate was 41.2%. Mean postoperative stay was 7.1 days (range = 4-23).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Nonoperative management is a viable option in most emergency patients presenting with AD and EDA, even in the presence of symptoms of peritonitis or altered laboratory tests. Delayed laparoscopic sigmoidectomy may be useless in certain cases and its results poorer than expected.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22274929 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/challenging-a-classic-myth-pneumoperitoneum-associated-with-acute-diverticulitis-is-not-an-indication-for-open-or-laparoscopic-emergency-surgery-in-hemodynamically-stable-patients-a-10-year-experien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-extraperitoneal-aortic-dissection-does-single-port-surgery-offer-the-same-possibilities-as-conventional-laparoscopy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-extraperitoneal-aortic-dissection-does-single-port-surgery-offer-the-same-possibilities-as-conventional-laparoscopy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;
        Authors:  Lambaudie E, Cannone F, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Houvenaeg...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lambaudie E, Cannone F, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Houvenaeghel G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of single-port surgery (SPS) for laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection.                                         METHODS:                       From December 2010 to April 2011, all patients referred for aortic lymph node staging underwent a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach with a single-port device. The extraperitoneal approach was performed using only one 3-4 cm incision on the left side. Gelpoint from Applied Medical (Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA), a 10-mm 0° laparoscope, and 5-mm standard instruments were used.                                         RESULTS:                       The study enrolled 13 patients. Aortic dissection was complete for 11 patients and incomplete for 2 patients. The mean lymph node count was 16 (range, 7-40). The mean blood loss was 40.7 ml (range, 0-100 ml), and no transfusion was necessary. The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range, 1-4 days) for this series.                                         CONCLUSION:                       The study results demonstrate the feasibility of single-port-access laparoscopy for extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy. The lymph node count was similar to that described in the published experience of conventional laparoscopic extraperitoneal dissection. This preliminary report shows that SPS is usable for extraperitoneal aortic dissection and that it is possible to perform this procedure using only one skin incision compared with the three or four incisions required for conventional laparoscopy.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22278100 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-extraperitoneal-aortic-dissection-does-single-port-surgery-offer-the-same-possibilities-as-conventional-laparoscopy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery for left-lateral hepatic sectionectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopy: case-matched analysis from a single center.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoendoscopic-single-site-less-surgery-for-left-lateral-hepatic-sectionectomy-as-an-alternative-to-traditional-laparoscopy-case-matched-analysis-from-a-single-center/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoendoscopic-single-site-less-surgery-for-left-lateral-hepatic-sectionectomy-as-an-alternative-to-traditional-laparoscopy-case-matched-analysis-from-a-single-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery for left-lateral hepatic sectionectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopy: case-matched analysis from a single center.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;
        Authors:  Aldrighetti L, R...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery for left-lateral hepatic sectionectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopy: case-matched analysis from a single center.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;</p>
<p>Authors:  Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Catena M, Pulitanò C, Ferla F, Cipriani F, Ferla G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopy is considered the &#8220;gold standard&#8221; to perform left-lateral sectionectomy with results identical to those of open surgery, yielding decreased postoperative pain and disability, reduced hospital stay, and shortened patient recovery time. As the emphasis on minimizing the invasiveness of surgical techniques continues, laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery is quickly evolving. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic left-lateral sectionectomy performed using the traditional approach or LESS approach with a case-matched analysis for tumor size, type of resection, and surgical indications.                                         METHODS:                       Thirteen patients who underwent LESS left-lateral sectionectomy are considered the study group (LESS group) and compared with 13 patients who underwent left-lateral sectionectomy with traditional laparoscopic approach (conventional group).                                         RESULTS:                       There were no significant differences between groups for length of surgery (165 min in conventional group vs. 195 min in LESS group), blood loss (150 mL in conventional group vs. 175 mL in LESS group), conversion to open surgery, histological tumor exposure, and requirements of postoperative analgesics. One patient in the LESS group died of cardiac failure due to an unknown severe aortic valve stenosis. No differences were recorded for postoperative complications (23.1% in both groups) and median length of postoperative stay (4 days in both groups).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       For left-lateral hepatic sectionectomy, LESS surgery is technically feasible and as safe as traditional laparoscopic surgery in terms of intraoperative and postoperative results, even though requiring both hepatobiliary and laparoscopic technique experience.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22278101 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoendoscopic-single-site-less-surgery-for-left-lateral-hepatic-sectionectomy-as-an-alternative-to-traditional-laparoscopy-case-matched-analysis-from-a-single-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/nerve-sparing-laparoscopic-eradication-of-deep-endometriosis-with-segmental-rectal-and-parametrial-resection-the-negrar-method-a-single-center-prospective-clinical-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/nerve-sparing-laparoscopic-eradication-of-deep-endometriosis-with-segmental-rectal-and-parametrial-resection-the-negrar-method-a-single-center-prospective-clinical-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;
        Authors:  Ceccaroni M, C...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F, D&#8217;Urso E, Gagliardi ML, Roviglione G, Minelli L, Ruffo G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The weight of surgical radicality, together with a lack of anatomical theoretical basis for surgery and inappropriate practical skills, can lead to serious impairments to bladder, rectal, and sexual functions after laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Although the &#8220;classical&#8221; laparoscopic technique for endometriosis excision involving segmental bowel resection has proven to relieve symptoms successfully, it is hampered by several postoperative long-term and/or definitive pelvic dysfunctions.                                         METHODS:                       In this prospective cohort study, we compare the laparoscopic nerve-sparing approach to the classical laparoscopic procedure in a series of 126 cases. Satisfactory data for bowel, bladder, and sexual function were considered as primary endpoints.                                         RESULTS:                       A total of 126 patients were considered for analysis: 61 treated with nerve-sparing radical excision of pelvic endometriosis with segmental bowel resection (group B), and 65 treated with the classical technique (group A). Intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. Mean days of self-catheterization were significantly lower in the nerve-sparing group (39.8 days) compared with the non-nerve-sparing group (121.1 days; p &lt; 0.001). The relapse rate within 12 months after surgery was comparable between the two groups. Patients of group A suffered from urinary retention more frequently between 1 and 6 months (p = 0.035) compared with group B and did not experience any improvement between 6 months and 1 year (p = 0.018). Overall detection of severe bladder/rectal/sexual dysfunctions was significantly different between the two groups, and 56 patients of group A (86.2%) reported a significantly higher rate of severe neurologic pelvic dysfunctions vs. 1 patient (1.6%) of group B (p &lt; 0.001).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Our technique appears to be feasible and offers good results in terms of reduced bladder morbidity and apparently higher satisfaction than the classical technique. Considering that this kind of surgery requires uncommon surgical skills and anatomical knowledge, we believe that it should be performed only in selected reference centers.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22278102 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/nerve-sparing-laparoscopic-eradication-of-deep-endometriosis-with-segmental-rectal-and-parametrial-resection-the-negrar-method-a-single-center-prospective-clinical-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/use-of-fibrin-sealant-tisseeltissucol-in-hernia-repair-a-systematic-review/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/use-of-fibrin-sealant-tisseeltissucol-in-hernia-repair-a-systematic-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;
        Authors:  Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Glaser KS, Redl H
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;</p>
<p>Authors:  Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Glaser KS, Redl H</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Abdominal wall and inguinal hernia repair are the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the United States and Europe. However, traditional methods of mesh fixation are associated with a number of problems including substantial risks of recurrence and of postoperative and chronic pain. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the clinical safety and efficacy of Tisseel/Tissucol fibrin sealant for hernia mesh fixation.                                         METHODS:                       A PubMed title/abstract search was conducted using the following terms: (fibrin glue OR fibrin sealant OR Tisseel OR Tissucol) AND hernia repair. The bibliographies of the publications identified in the search were reviewed for additional references.                                         RESULTS:                       There were 36 Tisseel/Tissucol studies included in this review involving 5,993 patients undergoing surgery for hernia. In open repair of inguinal hernias, Tisseel compared favorably with traditional methods of mesh fixation, being associated with shorter operative times and hospital stays and a lower incidence of chronic pain. Similarly, after laparoscopic/endoscopic inguinal hernia repair, Tisseel/Tissucol was associated with less use of postoperative analgesics and less acute and chronic postoperative pain than tissue-penetrating mesh-fixation methods. Other end points of concern to surgeons and patients are the risks of inguinal hernia recurrence and of complications such as hematoma formation and intraoperative bleeding. Comparative studies show that Tisseel/Tissucol does not increase the risk of these outcomes and may, in fact, decrease the risk compared with tissue-penetrating fixation methods. When used in the repair of incisional hernias, Tisseel/Tissucol significantly decreased both postoperative morbidity and duration of hospital stay.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Clinical evidence published to date supports the use of Tisseel/Tissucol as an option for mesh fixation in open and laparoscopic/endoscopic repair of inguinal and incisional hernias. Guidelines of the International Endohernia Society recommend fibrin sealant mesh fixation, especially in inguinal hernia repair. Nonfixation is reserved for selected cases.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22278103 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/use-of-fibrin-sealant-tisseeltissucol-in-hernia-repair-a-systematic-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection with intraoperative splenic blood salvage.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-splenectomy-and-azygoportal-disconnection-with-intraoperative-splenic-blood-salvage/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-splenectomy-and-azygoportal-disconnection-with-intraoperative-splenic-blood-salvage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection with intraoperative splenic blood salvage.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;
        Authors:  Wang Y, Ji Y, Zhu Y, Xie Z, Zhan X
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                    ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection with intraoperative splenic blood salvage.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;</p>
<p>Authors:  Wang Y, Ji Y, Zhu Y, Xie Z, Zhan X</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Intraoperative blood salvage can reduce or avoid perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Salvaging the blood in the portal hypertension-induced enlarged spleen becomes an issue of concern during devascularization surgery because an enlarged spleen accommodates a large red cell pool. We report 20 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection and present the advantages of the use of intraoperative splenic blood salvage during the procedure.                                         METHODS:                       A total of 20 cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding refractory to treatment with β-blockers and endoscopic therapy were studied. Laparoscopic splenectomy with azygoportal disconnection was performed. During the procedure, an intraoperative autologous blood salvage device recovered the splenic blood. The perioperative data were recorded from various viewpoints.                                         RESULTS:                        The operative time was 3.1 ± 0.3 h and the blood loss was 70.5 ± 32.5 ml. The weight of the excised and morcellated spleen was 826.0 ± 155.1 g. The volume of autotransfused blood was 541.0 ± 150.4 ml. No patient received a perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. There were no significant complications either intraoperatively or postoperatively. The hemoglobin value increased from 9.3 ± 0.8 to 11.5 ± 1.1 g/dl at postoperative day 1 (p &lt; 0.01). During a postoperative follow-up period of 18.0 ± 9.0 months for 18 patients, neither esophageal variceal bleeding nor encephalopathy recurred.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Laparoscopic splenectomy with azygoportal disconnection is a feasible, effective, and safe surgical method for the treatment of bleeding portal hypertension. Intraoperative splenic blood salvage can avoid the risk associated with allogeneic transfusion during the procedure, with an advantage of significantly increased postoperative hemoglobin levels.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22278104 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-splenectomy-and-azygoportal-disconnection-with-intraoperative-splenic-blood-salvage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-treatment-of-large-colorectal-tumors-comparison-of-endoscopic-mucosal-resection-endoscopic-mucosal-resection-precutting-and-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-treatment-of-large-colorectal-tumors-comparison-of-endoscopic-mucosal-resection-endoscopic-mucosal-resection-precutting-and-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;
        Authors:  Lee EJ, Lee JB, L...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 26;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, Youk EG</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a useful therapeutic technique for colorectal tumors. However, for tumors larger than 20 mm, the chance of piecemeal resection is high. Recently introduced endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection regardless of the tumor size. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of EMR, EMR-precutting (EMR-P), and ESD in the treatment of colorectal tumors 20 mm in size or larger.                                         METHODS:                       This study reviewed 523 nonpedunculated colorectal tumors (499 patients) 20 mm or larger that received endoscopic treatment (EMR in 140 cases, EMR-P in 69 cases, and ESD in 314 cases) from January 2004 to November 2009.                                         RESULTS:                       The mean sizes of the tumors were 21.7 ± 3.5 mm (EMR), 23.5 ± 5.6 mm (EMR-P), and 28.9 ± 12.7 mm (ESD). The ratios of adenocarcinomas were 15.7% (EMR), 29% (EMR-P), and 37.9% (ESD). The en bloc resection rates were 42.9% (EMR), 65.2% (EMR-P), and 92.7% (ESD), and the complete resection rates were 32.9% (EMR), 59.4% (EMR-P), and 87.6% (ESD). Perforation occurred in 2.9% of the EMR-P cases and 8% of the ESD cases. The recurrence rates were 25.9% (EMR; median follow-up period, 26 months), 3.2% (EMR-P; median follow-up period, 16 months), and 0.8% (ESD; median follow-up period, 17 months).                                         CONCLUSION:                       For the treatment of large, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors, ESD is more effective than either EMR or EMR-P. Although ESD is technically demanding, it has clinical significance by overcoming the limitations of both EMR and EMR-P.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22278105 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-treatment-of-large-colorectal-tumors-comparison-of-endoscopic-mucosal-resection-endoscopic-mucosal-resection-precutting-and-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The effect of perioperative psychological intervention on fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-effect-of-perioperative-psychological-intervention-on-fatigue-after-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-controlled-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-effect-of-perioperative-psychological-intervention-on-fatigue-after-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-controlled-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The effect of perioperative psychological intervention on fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Kahokehr A, Broadbent E, Wheeler BR, Sammour T, Hill AG
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The effect of perioperative psychological intervention on fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kahokehr A, Broadbent E, Wheeler BR, Sammour T, Hill AG</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Fatigue is one of the main complaints after surgery and may last longer than physical symptoms. It prevents return to normal function and activity. Relaxation interventions, performed prior to abdominal surgery, have been shown to reduce pain, wound erythema, and systemic cortisol levels. However, there is a lack of data on the impact of this intervention on patient well-being, functional recovery, activities of daily living, and fatigue after discharge from hospital.                                         METHODS:                       The study was a randomised single-blinded trial. Patients who were to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for any indication between April 2008 and May 2010 were screened for inclusion. Those in the intervention group attended a standardised 45 min relaxation session with a health psychologist and were given relaxation exercise CDs to take home. The control group did not have the intervention. Patients were followed for 30 days. Fatigue was measured using the identity-consequence fatigue scale.                                         RESULTS:                       Seventy-five patients were randomised. Fifteen patients were excluded after randomization for various reasons; hence, 60 patients were followed up and analysed. Both groups had similar fatigue at baseline. There was improved fatigue and consequence of fatigue on postoperative day 30 in the intervention group. There was no difference in fatigue at any other time point postoperatively.                                         CONCLUSION:                       This was the first interventional study targeting fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a brief psychological relaxation intervention. It has shown a reduction of fatigue and impact of fatigue at 30 days postoperatively in the intervention group.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258294 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-effect-of-perioperative-psychological-intervention-on-fatigue-after-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-controlled-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and partial-thickness myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) technique.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-comparative-study-of-endoscopic-full-thickness-and-partial-thickness-myotomy-using-submucosal-endoscopy-with-mucosal-safety-flap-semf-technique/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-comparative-study-of-endoscopic-full-thickness-and-partial-thickness-myotomy-using-submucosal-endoscopy-with-mucosal-safety-flap-semf-technique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and partial-thickness myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) technique.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Bonin EA, Moran E, Bingener J, Knipschie...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and partial-thickness myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) technique.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Bonin EA, Moran E, Bingener J, Knipschield M, Gostout CJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Esophageal myotomy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal safety flap (SEMF) has been proposed as a new treatment of achalasia. In this technique, a partial-thickness myotomy (PTM) preserving the longitudinal outer esophageal muscular layer is advocated, which is different from the usual full-thickness myotomy (FTM) performed surgically. The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic FTM and PTM and analyze the outcomes of each method after a 4 week survival period.                                         METHODS:                       Twenty-four pigs were randomly assigned into group A (FTM, 12 animals) and group B (PTM) to undergo endoscopic myotomy. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was assessed using pull-through manometry. For statistical analysis we compared the average esophageal sphincter pressure values at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks between groups A and B. The P value was set as &lt;0.05 for significance.                                         RESULTS:                       Eighteen animals were included for statistical analysis. Mean (SD) LES pressures were similar between groups A and B (nine animals each) at baseline [group A = 23 (10.4) mmHg; group B = 20.7 (8.7) mmHg; P = 0.79], after 2 weeks [group A = 19 (7.7) mmHg; group B = 21.8 (8.4) mmHg; P = 0.79], and after 4 weeks [group A = 22.6 (10.2) mmHg; group B = 20.7 (9) mmHg; P = 0.82]. LES pressures were significantly reduced in three animals after 4 weeks: one animal (1%) in group A and two animals (2.5%) in group B. An extended myotomy (3 cm below the cardia) was achieved in three animals and was responsible for the significant drop in LES pressure seen in the two animals from group B.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Esophageal myotomy using SEMF is a feasible yet challenging procedure in pigs. Full-thickness myotomy does not seem to be superior to partial-thickness myotomy as demonstrated by pull-through manometry. Endoscopic esophageal myotomy results are greatly influenced by obtaining adequate myotomy extension into the gastric cardia.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258295 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-comparative-study-of-endoscopic-full-thickness-and-partial-thickness-myotomy-using-submucosal-endoscopy-with-mucosal-safety-flap-semf-technique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perioperative polyphenon E- and siliphos-inhibited colorectal tumor growth and metastases without impairment of gastric or abdominal wound healing in mouse models.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/perioperative-polyphenon-e-and-siliphos-inhibited-colorectal-tumor-growth-and-metastases-without-impairment-of-gastric-or-abdominal-wound-healing-in-mouse-models/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/perioperative-polyphenon-e-and-siliphos-inhibited-colorectal-tumor-growth-and-metastases-without-impairment-of-gastric-or-abdominal-wound-healing-in-mouse-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Perioperative polyphenon E- and siliphos-inhibited colorectal tumor growth and metastases without impairment of gastric or abdominal wound healing in mouse models.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Yan X, Gardner TR, Grieco...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Perioperative polyphenon E- and siliphos-inhibited colorectal tumor growth and metastases without impairment of gastric or abdominal wound healing in mouse models.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Yan X, Gardner TR, Grieco M, Herath SA, Jang JH, Kirchoff D, Njoh L, Shantha Kumara HM, Naffouje S, Whelan RL</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION:                       Perioperative anticancer therapy that does not impair wound healing is needed to counter the persistent proangiogenic plasma compositional changes that occur after colorectal resection. Polyphenon E (PolyE), a green tea derivative (main component EGCG), and Siliphos (main component silibinin), from the milk thistle plant, both have antitumor effects. This study assessed the impact of PolyE/Siliphos (PES) on wound healing and the growth of CT-26 colon cancer in several murine models.                                         METHODS:                       One wound healing and three tumor studies were performed. Tumor Study (TS)1 assessed the impact of PES on subcutaneous tumor growth, whereas TS2 assessed PES&#8217;s impact on subcutaneous growth when given pre- and post-CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (pneumo), sham laparotomy, or anesthesia alone. TS3 determined the ability of PES to limit hepatic metastases (mets) after portal venous injection of tumor cells. In the final study, laparotomy and gastrotomy wound healing were assessed several ways. BALB/c mice were used for all studies. The drugs were given via drinking water (PolyE) and gavage (Siliphos), daily, for 7-9 days preprocedure and for 7-21 days postoperatively. Tumor mass, number/size of hepatic mets, and proliferation and apoptosis rates were assessed. The abdominal breaking strength and energy to failure were measured postmortem as was gastric bursting pressures.                                         RESULTS:                       PES significantly inhibited subcutaneous growth in the nonoperative setting. PES also significantly decreased the number/size of liver mets when given perioperatively. Abdominal wound breaking strength, energy to wound failure, and collagen content were not altered by PES; gastrotomy bursting strength also was not affected by PES. Neither drug alone had a significant impact on tumor growth.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The PES combination inhibited subcutaneous and hepatic tumor growth yet did not impair wound healing. PES holds promise as a perioperative anticancer therapy.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258296 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/perioperative-polyphenon-e-and-siliphos-inhibited-colorectal-tumor-growth-and-metastases-without-impairment-of-gastric-or-abdominal-wound-healing-in-mouse-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice total colectomy: technical report of a minilaparoscopy-assisted transrectal resection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/minilaparoscopy-assisted-natural-orifice-total-colectomy-technical-report-of-a-minilaparoscopy-assisted-transrectal-resection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/minilaparoscopy-assisted-natural-orifice-total-colectomy-technical-report-of-a-minilaparoscopy-assisted-transrectal-resection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice total colectomy: technical report of a minilaparoscopy-assisted transrectal resection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Lacy AM, Saavedra-Perez D, Bravo R, Adelsdorfer C, Aceituno M...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice total colectomy: technical report of a minilaparoscopy-assisted transrectal resection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lacy AM, Saavedra-Perez D, Bravo R, Adelsdorfer C, Aceituno M, Balust J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Experimental experience and the technological evolution of minimally invasive surgical devices have allowed initial reports describing the clinical applicability of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Colorectal resections are an interesting target for the NOTES platform. Theoretically, the transrectal approach could overcome the proposed limitations of transvaginal access, increasing NOTES clinical applicability. Hybrid procedures such as minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery (MA-NOS) are the safe progression to pure NOTES. This report describes the first clinical case of a transrectal MA-NOS total colectomy.                                         METHODS:                       The patient was a 36-year-old man with severe ulcerative colitis (UC) who experienced failure of immunosuppressive therapy. The standard steps of laparoscopic total colectomy were respected, with basic triangulation maintained throughout the case. A transrectal endoscopic device was used for optic assistance, colon dissection, ileum section, and specimen retrieval. Transrectal MA-NOS total colectomy was assisted by three laparoscopic ports: a 12-mm port used as the terminal ileostomy site, a 2-mm needle epigastric port, and a 5-mm umbilical port used as a drain site at the final intervention. No intraoperative complications occurred.                                         RESULTS:                       The total operative time was 240 min. Oral intake was initiated on postoperative day 2. Because of UC rectal activity, a course with azathioprine was completed, and the patient was discharged receiving 1 g of rectal mesalazine for maintenance. The final pathology demonstrated pancolonic inflammatory bowel disease in the form of UC with severe activity.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                         Transrectal MA-NOS total colectomy was feasible and safe in the reported case. Improvement in NOTES instrumentation and selective clinical applications are mandatory before clinical trials.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258297 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/minilaparoscopy-assisted-natural-orifice-total-colectomy-technical-report-of-a-minilaparoscopy-assisted-transrectal-resection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted liposuction for lymph node dissection: a pilot study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-ultrasound-assisted-liposuction-for-lymph-node-dissection-a-pilot-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-ultrasound-assisted-liposuction-for-lymph-node-dissection-a-pilot-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted liposuction for lymph node dissection: a pilot study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Bonin EA, Mariani A, Swain J, Bingener J, Sumiyama K, Knipschield M, Sebo TJ, Gostout CJ
        Abstr...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted liposuction for lymph node dissection: a pilot study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Bonin EA, Mariani A, Swain J, Bingener J, Sumiyama K, Knipschield M, Sebo TJ, Gostout CJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Lymphadenectomy is a surgical technique for staging and treating cancer. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for obese patients is challenging. Laparoscopic ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) has been successful in porcine models. The current study aimed to evaluate whether UAL facilitates pelvic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in obese subjects.                                         METHODS:                       The UAL technique was evaluated in two human cadavers and in six obese Ossabaw pigs. Both a standard and a prototype ultrasonic probe with a wider contact surface were tested. Pelvic lymphadenectomy comparing UAL with standard monopolar cautery was performed using obese Ossabaw pigs. The animals were survived for 2 weeks. Descriptive data regarding intra- and postoperative outcomes were recorded, including histologic analysis of dissected tissue after 2 weeks. Cytologic analysis of aspirated fluid coming from UAL also was recorded.                                         RESULTS:                       The UAL procedure was safely performed for all the cadavers and animals. Lymph node exposure and clean exposure of surrounding structures were dramatic compared with monopolar assisted dissection. One animal was excluded from further analysis due to ultrasonic device malfunction (a broken footswitch cord). In general, UAL notably debulks adipose tissue with dramatic field exposure. Postoperative adhesions were present in all animals undergoing either monopolar or UAL dissection. Histology showed areas of foreign body reaction from mild to severe, with no predominance of either extreme seen with monopolar or UAL dissection. Cytologic analysis of collected pooled oil emulsion did not contain lymph node tissue.                                         CONCLUSION:                       The UAL approach permits pelvic lymphadenectomy in the obese animal and cadaver model, with excellent exposure of lymph nodes and surrounding pelvic anatomy. The use of a new ultrasonic prototype probe with a wider contact surface allowed dissection with less mechanical and thermal penetration of tissue. Further studies are needed to assess oncologic safety (cancer cell dissemination), postoperative healing, and adhesion formation.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258298 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-ultrasound-assisted-liposuction-for-lymph-node-dissection-a-pilot-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indications, safety, and feasibility of conversion of failed bariatric surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective comparative study with primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/indications-safety-and-feasibility-of-conversion-of-failed-bariatric-surgery-to-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-a-retrospective-comparative-study-with-primary-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/indications-safety-and-feasibility-of-conversion-of-failed-bariatric-surgery-to-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-a-retrospective-comparative-study-with-primary-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Indications, safety, and feasibility of conversion of failed bariatric surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective comparative study with primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Autho...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Indications, safety, and feasibility of conversion of failed bariatric surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective comparative study with primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Deylgat B, D&#8217;Hondt M, Pottel H, Vansteenkiste F, Van Rooy F, Devriendt D</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the &#8220;gold standard&#8221; revision procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of primary laparoscopic RYGB (pLRYGB) to revisional open or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (rRYGB).                                         METHODS:                       A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent pLRYGB or rRYGB from January 2003 to December 2009 has been performed. Demographics, indications for revision, and complications have been reviewed. The rRYGB and pLRYGB patients have been compared.                                         RESULTS:                       Seventy-two patients underwent rRYGB, and 652 patients underwent pLRYGB. Mean follow-up was 35 and 45 months, respectively. Fifty-six rRYGB procedures were performed laparoscopically. The primary operations had consisted of laparoscopic gastric banding (n = 28), laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 19), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (n = 6), laparoscopic RYGB (n = 3), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (n = 16). Indications included weight regain (n = 29), malabsorption (n = 16), gastrogastric fistula (n = 5), band-associated problems (n = 3), and refractory stomal ulceration (n = 1). There was no significant difference in early or late postoperative complications when comparing rRYGB to pLRYGBP patients (11.1% vs. 5.52%, P = 0.069 and 19.4% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.465 respectively). Five rRYGB patients (7.04%) required reintervention (3 internal hernias, 1 ventral hernia, 1 laparoscopic exploration) compared with 101 pLRYGB patients (15.71%; P = 0.051). None of the patients died. Mean hospital stay was not significantly longer in the rRYGB group (5.38 vs. 4.95 days, P = 0.058).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       In our series, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality of rRYGB were not significantly higher compared with pLRYGB. Furthermore, we believe that this type of revisional bariatric surgery should be performed in high-volume bariatric centers.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258299 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/indications-safety-and-feasibility-of-conversion-of-failed-bariatric-surgery-to-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-a-retrospective-comparative-study-with-primary-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-and-open-surgical-treatment-of-left-sided-pancreatic-lesions-clinical-outcomes-and-cost-effectiveness-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-and-open-surgical-treatment-of-left-sided-pancreatic-lesions-clinical-outcomes-and-cost-effectiveness-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Limongelli P, Belli A, Russo G, Cioffi L, D'Agostino A, Fantini...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Limongelli P, Belli A, Russo G, Cioffi L, D&#8217;Agostino A, Fantini C, Belli G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Previous studies comparing open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) have found advantages related to minimal-access surgery. Few studies have compared direct and associated costs after LDP versus ODP. The purpose of the current study was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LDP and ODP and to assess whether LDP was a cost-effective procedure compared with the traditional ODP.                                         METHODS:                       A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 52 distal pancreatic resections that were performed during a 10-year period was performed.                                         RESULTS:                       Patients included in the analysis were 16 in the LDP group and 29 in the ODP. Tumors operated laparoscopically were smaller than those removed at open operation, but the length of pancreatic resection was similar. The mean operating time for LDP was longer than ODP (204 ± 31 vs. 160 ± 35; P &lt; 0.0001), whereas blood loss was higher in the open group (365 ± 215 vs. 160 ± 185, P &lt; 0.0001). Morbidity (25 vs. 41; P = 0.373) and pancreatic fistula (18 vs. 20%; P = 0.6) rates were similar after LDP and ODP, as was 30-day mortality (0 vs. 2%; P = 0.565). LDP had a shorter mean length of hospital stay than ODP (6.4 (2.3) vs. 8.8 (1.7) days; P &lt; 0.0001). Operative cost for LDP was higher than ODP (&lt;euro&gt;2889 vs. &lt;euro&gt;1989; P &lt; 0.0001). The entire cost of the associated hospital stay was higher in the ODP group (&lt;euro&gt;8955 vs. &lt;euro&gt;6714; P &lt; 0.043). The total cost was comparable in LDP and ODP groups (&lt;euro&gt;9603 vs. &lt;euro&gt;10944; P = 0.204).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided lesions can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients, with reduced hospital stay and operative blood loss. Major complications, including pancreatic leak, were not reduced, whereas total cost was comparable between LDP and ODP. A selective use of LDP seems to be an effective and cost-efficient alternative to ODP.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258300 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-and-open-surgical-treatment-of-left-sided-pancreatic-lesions-clinical-outcomes-and-cost-effectiveness-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elective laparoscopic versus open colectomy for diverticulosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/elective-laparoscopic-versus-open-colectomy-for-diverticulosis-an-analysis-of-acs-nsqip-database/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/elective-laparoscopic-versus-open-colectomy-for-diverticulosis-an-analysis-of-acs-nsqip-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Elective laparoscopic versus open colectomy for diverticulosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Kakarla VR, Nurkin SJ, Sharma S, Ruiz DE, Tiszenkel H
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Elective laparoscopic versus open colectomy for diverticulosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kakarla VR, Nurkin SJ, Sharma S, Ruiz DE, Tiszenkel H</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The benefits of laparoscopic (LC) versus open (OC) colectomy for symptomatic colonic diverticulosis as an elective operation remain unclear.                                         METHODS:                       Using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) participant-user file, patients were identified who underwent elective colon resection for symptomatic colonic diverticulosis, between 2005 and 2008. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative variables, and 30-day morbidity and mortality were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between the surgical approach (LC vs. OC) and risk-adjusted overall mortality, overall morbidity, serious morbidity, and wound complications.                                         RESULTS:                       A total of 7,629 patients were identified who underwent colon resection for symptomatic diverticulosis. They were subdivided into two groups: OC (3,870 (50.7%)) and LC (3,759 (49.3%)). Patients who underwent OC were significantly older (59.0 vs. 55.7 years, P &lt; 0.0001) with more comorbidities compared with those who underwent LC. After risk-adjusted analysis, it was noted that the patients treated with LC were significantly less likely to experience overall morbidity (11.9% vs. 23.2%), serious morbidity (4.6% vs. 10.9%), and wound complications (9.1% vs. 17.5%), but not mortality (0.3% vs. 0.8%). Operative duration was significantly longer with LC (176.64 vs. 166.70 min, P &lt; 0.0001), but the length of stay was significantly shorter (4.77 vs. 7.68 days, P &lt; 0.0001). Using logistic regression analysis, patients with history of peripheral vascular disease, percutaneous coronary interventions, current steroid use, and hypertension requiring medication were at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality at 30 days. Patients with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking experienced more wound complications at 30 days.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       In the elective setting for symptomatic diverticulosis, LC seems to be associated with lower 30-day morbidity and complication rates compared with OC.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258301 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/elective-laparoscopic-versus-open-colectomy-for-diverticulosis-an-analysis-of-acs-nsqip-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/collaborative-eye-tracking-a-potential-training-tool-in-laparoscopic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/collaborative-eye-tracking-a-potential-training-tool-in-laparoscopic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;
        Authors:  Chetwood AS, Kwok KW, Sun LW, Mylonas GP, Clark J, Darzi A, Yang GZ
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:      ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 19;</p>
<p>Authors:  Chetwood AS, Kwok KW, Sun LW, Mylonas GP, Clark J, Darzi A, Yang GZ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Eye-tracking technology has been shown to improve trainee performance in the aircraft industry, radiology, and surgery. The ability to track the point-of-regard of a supervisor and reflect this onto a subjects&#8217; laparoscopic screen to aid instruction of a simulated task is attractive, in particular when considering the multilingual make up of modern surgical teams and the development of collaborative surgical techniques. We tried to develop a bespoke interface to project a supervisors&#8217; point-of-regard onto a subjects&#8217; laparoscopic screen and to investigate whether using the supervisor&#8217;s eye-gaze could be used as a tool to aid the identification of a target during a surgical-simulated task.                                         METHODS:                       We developed software to project a supervisors&#8217; point-of-regard onto a subjects&#8217; screen whilst undertaking surgically related laparoscopic tasks. Twenty-eight subjects with varying levels of operative experience and proficiency in English undertook a series of surgically minded laparoscopic tasks. Subjects were instructed with verbal queues (V), a cursor reflecting supervisor&#8217;s eye-gaze (E), or both (VE). Performance metrics included time to complete tasks, eye-gaze latency, and number of errors.                                         RESULTS:                       Completion times and number of errors were significantly reduced when eye-gaze instruction was employed (VE, E). In addition, the time taken for the subject to correctly focus on the target (latency) was significantly reduced.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       We have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of a novel framework to enable a supervisor eye-gaze to be projected onto a trainee&#8217;s laparoscopic screen. Furthermore, we have shown that utilizing eye-tracking technology to provide visual instruction improves completion times and reduces errors in a simulated environment. Although this technology requires significant development, the potential applications are wide-ranging.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22258302 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/collaborative-eye-tracking-a-potential-training-tool-in-laparoscopic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/advanced-stereoscopic-projection-technology-significantly-improves-novice-performance-of-minimally-invasive-surgical-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/advanced-stereoscopic-projection-technology-significantly-improves-novice-performance-of-minimally-invasive-surgical-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Smith R, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I
      ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Smith R, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Three-dimensional (3D) surgical imaging systems provide stereoscopic depth cues that are lost in conventional two-dimensional (2D) display systems. Recent improvements in stereoscopic projection technology using passive polarising displays may improve performance of minimally invasive surgical skills. This study aims to identify the effect of passive polarising stereoscopic displays on novice surgeon performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.                                         METHODS:                       20 novice surgeons performed 10 repetitions of 4 surgical skills tasks using a new passive polarising stereoscopic display under 3D and 2D conditions. The previously validated tasks used were rope pass, paper cut, needle capping and knot tying. Outcome measures included total error rate and time for task completion.                                         RESULTS:                       Novice surgeons demonstrated a significant reduction in error rates for sequential repetitions of each task using the passive polarising stereoscopic display compared with the 2D display. Mean errors for the 3D versus the 2D mode were 2.0 versus 4.3 for rope pass (P ≤ 0.001), 0.8 versus 1.6 for paper cut (P = 0.001), 1.3 versus 4.2 for needle capping (P ≤ 0.001) and 2.8 versus 8.0 for knot tying (P ≤ 0.001). Novice surgeons demonstrated a significant improvement in mean time for completion for all four tasks when using the 3D system. Mean time (in seconds) for 3D versus 2D were 106.5 versus 134.4 for rope pass (P ≤ 0.001), 116.1 versus 176.3 for paper cut (P ≤ 0.001), 76.3 versus 141.6 for needle capping (P ≤ 0.001) and 153.4 versus 252.6 for knot tying (P ≤ 0.001).                                         CONCLUSION:                       Passive polarising stereoscopic displays significantly improve novice surgeon performance during acquisition of minimally invasive surgical skills.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234585 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/advanced-stereoscopic-projection-technology-significantly-improves-novice-performance-of-minimally-invasive-surgical-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The revised ACGME laparoscopic operative requirements: how have they impacted resident education?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-revised-acgme-laparoscopic-operative-requirements-how-have-they-impacted-resident-education/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-revised-acgme-laparoscopic-operative-requirements-how-have-they-impacted-resident-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The revised ACGME laparoscopic operative requirements: how have they impacted resident education?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Brown NM, Helmer SD, Yates CL, Osland JS
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:              ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The revised ACGME laparoscopic operative requirements: how have they impacted resident education?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Brown NM, Helmer SD, Yates CL, Osland JS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopic surgery has been an essential component of surgical education for the last two decades. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) changed the requirements for laparoscopic cases beginning with graduates in 2008, and the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery program was introduced over a decade ago as a method of measuring competency with laparoscopic techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine what changes have been made to meet these requirements and how these changes have impacted general surgery residents in their preparation to perform both basic and complex laparoscopic procedures upon completion of residency.                                         METHODS:                       A 23-question survey was distributed electronically to all fourth- and fifth-year residents of United States general surgery residency programs. Respondents were queried about demographics, perception of surgical education, and their level of preparedness to perform laparoscopic cases upon graduation.                                         RESULTS:                       The survey was completed by a total of 321 residents (174 fourth-year and 147 fifth-year). Nineteen percent of respondents indicated that they anticipated problems meeting the new ACGME guidelines and 18.7% of all respondents indicated that changes had been made to their program to meet those new requirements. The majority of residents felt they had adequate laparoscopic training upon graduation, but there was a disparity between program types. Despite this finding, more than one-third of respondents believed that it would be necessary to seek additional laparoscopic training post-residency graduation.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Residency training programs have had to keep pace with evolving technology while preparing future surgeons to perform with confidence upon completion of residency training. The majority of residents feel their training has been adequate, but there are also a great number who believe they will need to continue their education in laparoscopic surgery to keep pace with this ever-evolving field.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234586 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-revised-acgme-laparoscopic-operative-requirements-how-have-they-impacted-resident-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictive factors of excess body weight loss 1 year after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/predictive-factors-of-excess-body-weight-loss-1%c2%a0year-after-laparoscopic-bariatric-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/predictive-factors-of-excess-body-weight-loss-1%c2%a0year-after-laparoscopic-bariatric-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Predictive factors of excess body weight loss 1 year after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Ortega E, Morínigo R, Flores L, Moize V, Rios M, Lacy AM, Vidal J
        Abstract
        BACKG...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Predictive factors of excess body weight loss 1 year after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ortega E, Morínigo R, Flores L, Moize V, Rios M, Lacy AM, Vidal J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Bariatric surgery (BS) is widely accepted for the treatment of patients with morbid obesity (MO). We aimed to determine presurgical predictors of and surgical technique-related differences in excess weight loss (EWL) 1 year after BS.                                         METHODS:                       This retrospective study included 407 subjects (F/M 3:1, median age = 44 years) who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 307) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 100) at our University Hospital and were evaluated 1 year after surgery.                                         RESULTS:                       Baseline median (min-max) body mass index (BMI) was 47 kg/m(2) (range = 36-71). BMI was higher in the SG than in the RYGB group (53 vs. 46 kg/m(2), p &lt; 0.0001). Simple correlation analysis showed negative associations between EWL and age, BMI, waist circumference (WC), fasting glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides (TG), blood pressure, and total cholesterol (all p &lt; 0.01). EWL (mean ± SD) did not differ by gender (p = 0.2), was lower in diabetic than in nondiabetic subjects (71 ± 17% vs. 79 ± 17%, p &lt; 0.0001), and higher in the RYGB vs. SG group (76 ± 18% vs. 68 ± 15%, p &lt; 0.0001). However, SG vs. RYGB differences in EWL disappeared (p = 0.4) after taking into account baseline BMI. Multiple regression and logistic analysis showed that younger individuals with lower BMI but higher WC, and lower HbA1c and TG, had higher EWL and a higher rate of successful (EWL ≥ 60%) weight loss.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Our data indicate that some of the characteristics that would have subjects referred early for BS were associated with higher weight loss. Therefore, the timing of laparoscopic BS might be an important factor for MO individuals in which medical weight loss intervention has failed.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234587 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/predictive-factors-of-excess-body-weight-loss-1%c2%a0year-after-laparoscopic-bariatric-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-current-status-and-future-direction/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-current-status-and-future-direction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Maas K, Biere S, Van der Peet D, Cuesta M
        PMID: 22234588 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Maas K, Biere S, Van der Peet D, Cuesta M</p>
<p>PMID: 22234588 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-current-status-and-future-direction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Management of pyloric stricture in children: endoscopic balloon dilatation and surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/management-of-pyloric-stricture-in-children-endoscopic-balloon-dilatation-and-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/management-of-pyloric-stricture-in-children-endoscopic-balloon-dilatation-and-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Management of pyloric stricture in children: endoscopic balloon dilatation and surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Temiz A, Oguzkurt P, Ezer SS, Ince E, Gezer HO, Hicsonmez A
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Management of pyloric stricture in children: endoscopic balloon dilatation and surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Temiz A, Oguzkurt P, Ezer SS, Ince E, Gezer HO, Hicsonmez A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Surgical correction is the most preferred treatment modality in pyloric stricture (PS). Recently a few studies reported the experience of balloon dilation in children with PS. This study was designed to present our experiences of the management of the patients with PS with balloon dilation and corrective surgery.                                         METHODS:                       The records of 14 patients who were treated with the diagnosis of PS between August 2003 and August 2011 were reviewed retrospectively.                                         RESULTS:                       There were nine boys and five girls (mean age, 3.4 ± 1.7 years). The history of caustic ingestion was detected in eight patients; six of them were admitted on the day of ingestion. Two patients were admitted with nonbilious vomiting more than 2 weeks after ingestion. Four patients did not have a remarkable medical history, including caustic ingestion. They admitted with the complaint of nonbilious vomiting. PS was detected during endoscopy in two patients who had a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. PS was shown by barium meal study in all patients. Endoscopy was performed in all patients. Endoscopic balloon dilation was tried in 12 patients. Overall eight patients required surgical procedures for PS. The complaints were resolved by endoscopic balloon dilation of pylorus in the remaining six patients.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Although endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign PS in adults is a generally accepted method of treatment, there is less experience with endoscopic balloon dilatation for PS in children. PS due to benign disorders can be effectively and successfully treated through endoscopic balloon dilatation in suitable patients. In patients with successful pyloric balloon dilatation, surgery can be avoided.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234589 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/management-of-pyloric-stricture-in-children-endoscopic-balloon-dilatation-and-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic right pneumonectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-video-assisted-thoracoscopic-right-pneumonectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-video-assisted-thoracoscopic-right-pneumonectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic right pneumonectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R, Garcia J
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                       The most ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic right pneumonectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R, Garcia J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The most common approach for Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy is undertaken with three or four incisions, including a utility incision of about 3-5 cm. However, major pulmonary resections are amenable by using only a single utility incision. This video shows the technical procedure of a right pneumonectomy by single-incision approach with no rib spreading.                                         METHODS:                       A 52-year-old woman was proposed for single-incision VATS resection of a 5-cm right lower lobe adenocarcinoma. A 4-cm incision was made in the fifth intercostal space. We placed a 30-degree, high-definition, 10-mm thoracoscope in the posterior anterior part of the incision. Digital palpation confirmed that the tumor involved the fissure and the posterior portion of the upper lobe, which indicated the need for right pneumonectomy. We inserted the instruments through the anterior part of the utility incision to start the detachment of the right upper lobe by using a harmonic scalpel. The first step was dissecting the inferior pulmonary vein. The hilar structures were exposed by using harmonic scalpel and a long dissector (Fig. 1A). The upper and middle-lobe pulmonary veins were dissected and transected, allowing visualization of truncus anterior, which was then stapled. The inferior pulmonary vein and the intermediate truncus artery were divided, allowing optimal exposure to the main bronchus, which was stapled. The lung was removed in a protective bag by adding 1 cm to the incision, and a systematic lymph node dissection was performed. A single chest tube was placed in the posterior part of the utility incision.                                         RESULTS:                       Total surgery time was 210 min. The chest tube was removed on postoperative day 2 (Fig. 1B), and the patient was discharged home on day 4 with no complications.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Single-port VATS pneumonectomy for selected cases is a feasible procedure, especially when performed from a center with previous experience in double-port VATS approach.                                         DISCUSSION:                       Recent advances in surgical and video-assisted techniques have allowed minimally invasive pneumonectomy to be undertaken safely. VATS pneumonectomy is not a new procedure and in fact was initially reported 15 years ago and was felt to result in less postoperative pain and a faster return to normal activities [1]. Despite this, there have been only a few case reports or series published of VATS pneumonectomies [2, 3].<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234590 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-video-assisted-thoracoscopic-right-pneumonectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoendoscopic single-site minor hepatectomy for liver tumors.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoendoscopic-single-site-minor-hepatectomy-for-liver-tumors/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoendoscopic-single-site-minor-hepatectomy-for-liver-tumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoendoscopic single-site minor hepatectomy for liver tumors.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Tan EK, Lee VT, Chang SK, Ganpathi IS, Madhavan K, Lomanto D
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                       Lapa...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoendoscopic single-site minor hepatectomy for liver tumors.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Tan EK, Lee VT, Chang SK, Ganpathi IS, Madhavan K, Lomanto D</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopic liver surgery is gaining increasing acceptance worldwide, but its frontiers are constantly challenged. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been performed for various organs, but the feasibility of LESS hepatectomies has yet to be explored fully.                                         METHODS:                       From May 2010 to March 2011, seven patients underwent LESS minor hepatectomies. Patient demographic, operative, and clinical data were reviewed.                                         RESULTS:                       Five left lateral sectionectomies, one segment 3, and one segment 5 resection were performed. The median operative time was 142 min (range, 104-171 min), and the median blood loss was 200 ml (range, 100-450 ml). The median hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-11 days). For all the patients, the indications for surgery were suspected malignant tumors, and the surgical resection margins were clear for every patient.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Laparoendoscopic single-site minor hepatectomy is a novel modification to traditional laparoscopic surgery. The method is safe and feasible without any compromise to oncologic safety for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases that are peripheral and smaller than 5 cm in size.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234591 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoendoscopic-single-site-minor-hepatectomy-for-liver-tumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity (the LapRICon procedure): a safe and feasible technique for restoration of transanal defecation.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-restoration-of-intestinal-continuity-the-lapricon-procedure-a-safe-and-feasible-technique-for-restoration-of-transanal-defecation/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-restoration-of-intestinal-continuity-the-lapricon-procedure-a-safe-and-feasible-technique-for-restoration-of-transanal-defecation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity (the LapRICon procedure): a safe and feasible technique for restoration of transanal defecation.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Lim M, El-Haddad M, Bonam K, Burke D
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity (the LapRICon procedure): a safe and feasible technique for restoration of transanal defecation.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lim M, El-Haddad M, Bonam K, Burke D</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The restoration of intestinal continuity after open abdominal surgery can be technically challenging. The authors describe their experience with the laparoscopic approach to attempted reversal for patients with an exteriorized intestine.                                         METHODS:                       A consecutive series of patients under the care of a single surgeon (D.B.) underwent laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity (LapRICon). All the patients first underwent exclusion of intraabdominal sepsis with computed tomography (CT) scanning and then preoperative localization of proximal and distal bowel ends via water-soluble contrast studies. Stomal sites were used for initial access, establishment of capnoperitoneum, and formation of anastomoses extracorporeally. All adhesiolysis and mobilization of bowel ends were performed intracorporeally. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected for all the patients. Return of intestinal function, overall hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications were collected. Nonparametric statistics were used to analyze the data.                                         RESULTS:                       A total of 13 patients (6 women) were followed up for 9 months (interquartile range [IQR], 5-16 months). The median age of the patients was 39 years (IQR, 28-64 years). Nine patients were categorized as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 1. One patient was ASA 2, and the remaining patients were ASA 3. The median colorectal physiologic and operative severity scores for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (CR-POSSUM) were 0.68 (IQR, 0.68-1.72). The intraoperative blood loss was minimal (median 30 ml; IQR, 20-125 ml). The median operative duration was 240 min (IQR, 180-240 min), and a median of 4 ports (IQR, 3-5 ports) were used. Enterocolonic anastomoses were fashioned in six patients, enterorectal anastomoses in two patients, and enteroentero anastomoses in three patients. A single patient had multiple anastomoses. The median time to return of intestinal function was 5 days (IQR, 3-13 days), and the overall hospital stay was 8 days (IQR, 5-24 days). Four complications (25%) (2 recurrent fistulas, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 open conversion) occurred in this series of patients.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The LapRICon procedure is a feasible technique with acceptable morbidity. Several principles and techniques are described to aid the surgeon who wishes to embark on use of such a technique.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234592 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-restoration-of-intestinal-continuity-the-lapricon-procedure-a-safe-and-feasible-technique-for-restoration-of-transanal-defecation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessment of joystick and wrist control in hand-held articulated laparoscopic prototypes.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/assessment-of-joystick-and-wrist-control-in-hand-held-articulated-laparoscopic-prototypes/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/assessment-of-joystick-and-wrist-control-in-hand-held-articulated-laparoscopic-prototypes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Assessment of joystick and wrist control in hand-held articulated laparoscopic prototypes.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Okken LM, Chmarra MK, Hiemstra E, Jansen FW, Dankelman J
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Assessment of joystick and wrist control in hand-held articulated laparoscopic prototypes.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Okken LM, Chmarra MK, Hiemstra E, Jansen FW, Dankelman J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Various steerable instruments with flexible distal tip have been developed for laparoscopic surgery. The problem of steering such instruments, however, remains a challenge, because no study investigated which control method is the most suitable. This study was designed to examine whether thumb (joystick) or wrist control method is designated for prototypes of steerable instruments by means of motion analysis.                                         METHODS:                       Five experts and 12 novices participated. Each participant performed a needle-driving task in three directions (right → left, up → down, and down → up) with two prototypes (wrist and thumb) and a conventional instrument. Novices performed the tasks in three sessions, whereas experts performed one session only. The order of performing the tasks was determined by Latin squares design. Assessment of performance was done by means of five motion analysis parameters, a newly developed matrix for assigning penalty points, and a questionnaire.                                         RESULTS:                       The thumb-controlled prototype outperformed the wrist-controlled prototype. Comparison of the results obtained in each task showed that regarding penalty points, the up → down task was the most difficult to perform.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The thumb control is more suitable for steerable instruments than the wrist control. To avoid uncontrolled movements and difficulties with applying forces to the tissue while keeping the tip of the instrument at the constant angle, adding a &#8220;locking&#8221; feature is necessary. It is advisable not to perform the needle driving task in the up → down direction.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234593 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/assessment-of-joystick-and-wrist-control-in-hand-held-articulated-laparoscopic-prototypes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/hysteroscopic-placement-of-tubal-sterilization-implants-virtual-reality-simulator-training/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/hysteroscopic-placement-of-tubal-sterilization-implants-virtual-reality-simulator-training/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Panel P, Bajka M, Le Tohic A, Ghoneimi AE, Chis C, Cotin S
        Abstract
        STUDY OBJECT...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Panel P, Bajka M, Le Tohic A, Ghoneimi AE, Chis C, Cotin S</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        STUDY OBJECTIVE:                       To assess face and construct validity of a new virtual reality (VR) training simulator for hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants.                                         DESIGN:                       Nonrandomized, controlled trial comparing responses and performance of novices and experts on the simulator.                                         DESIGN CLASSIFICATION:                       Canadian task force II-1.                                         SETTING:                       Forty-six gynecologists were personally invited or recruited at the 33rd Conference of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) from December 9 to 12, 2009, grouped as 20 experts and 26 novices. They all performed the defined sequence of virtual procedures on the simulator (case 1 for familiarization, case 4 for study assessment) and finally completed the study questionnaire.                                         MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:                       Responses to realism, educational potential, and general opinion were excellent, proving face validity. Significant differences between novices and experts were assessed for 7 of the 15 metrics analyzed, proving construct validity.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       We established face and construct validity for EssureSim™, an educational VR simulator for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization implant placement. The next steps are to investigate convergent and predictive validity to affirm the real capacity of transferring the skills learned on the training simulator to the patient in the operating room.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22234594 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/hysteroscopic-placement-of-tubal-sterilization-implants-virtual-reality-simulator-training/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world is getting smaller.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-world-is-getting-smaller/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-world-is-getting-smaller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schwaitzberg SD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The world is getting smaller.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Schwaitzberg SD
        PMID: 22234595 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The world is getting smaller.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Schwaitzberg SD</p>
<p>PMID: 22234595 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-world-is-getting-smaller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erratum to: A modified two-port thoracoscopic technique versus axillary minithoracotomy for the treatment of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax: a prospective randomized study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-a-modified-two-port-thoracoscopic-technique-versus-axillary-minithoracotomy-for-the-treatment-of-recurrent-spontaneous-pneumothorax-a-prospective-randomized-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-a-modified-two-port-thoracoscopic-technique-versus-axillary-minithoracotomy-for-the-treatment-of-recurrent-spontaneous-pneumothorax-a-prospective-randomized-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Erratum to: A modified two-port thoracoscopic technique versus axillary minithoracotomy for the treatment of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax: a prospective randomized study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;
        Authors:  Foroulis CN,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Erratum to: A modified two-port thoracoscopic technique versus axillary minithoracotomy for the treatment of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax: a prospective randomized study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 11;</p>
<p>Authors:  Foroulis CN, Anastasiadis K, Charokopos N, Antonitsis P, Halvatzoulis HV, Karapanagiotidis GT, Grosomanidis V, Papakonstantinou C</p>
<p>PMID: 22234596 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-a-modified-two-port-thoracoscopic-technique-versus-axillary-minithoracotomy-for-the-treatment-of-recurrent-spontaneous-pneumothorax-a-prospective-randomized-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pylorus- and spleen-preserving total pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of both whole splenic vessels: feasibility and laparoscopic application to intraductal papillary mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/pylorus-and-spleen-preserving-total-pancreatoduodenectomy-with-resection-of-both-whole-splenic-vessels-feasibility-and-laparoscopic-application-to-intraductal-papillary-mucin-producing-tumors-of-the/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/pylorus-and-spleen-preserving-total-pancreatoduodenectomy-with-resection-of-both-whole-splenic-vessels-feasibility-and-laparoscopic-application-to-intraductal-papillary-mucin-producing-tumors-of-the/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Pylorus- and spleen-preserving total pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of both whole splenic vessels: feasibility and laparoscopic application to intraductal papillary mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Pylorus- and spleen-preserving total pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of both whole splenic vessels: feasibility and laparoscopic application to intraductal papillary mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 12;</p>
<p>Authors:  Choi SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Yoon CI, Lee WJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Total pancreatectomy is recommended for intraductal papillary mucinous tumors with widespread involvement of the entire pancreas. Organ-preserving and minimally invasive surgery should be applied in benign and borderline pancreatic lesions.                                         METHODS:                       Pylorus- and spleen-preserving total pancreatoduodenectomy (PpSpTPD) with segmental resection of both splenic vessels was attempted for five patients. The technique was based on the concepts of two surgical procedures: pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy with segmental resection of splenic vessels (&#8220;extended&#8221; Warshaw&#8217;s procedure).                                         RESULTS:                       Three patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted PpSpTPD and two underwent open surgery. No mortality was noted. Short-term follow-up (median, 28 months) suggested that all patients tolerated the insulin therapy and showed relatively good nutritional status. Only minimal to moderate perigastric fundal varices were noted without gastrointestinal bleeding.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       PpSpTPD with segmental resection of both splenic vessels is feasible and safe. Even a minimally invasive approach can be indicated in selected patients.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22237756 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/pylorus-and-spleen-preserving-total-pancreatoduodenectomy-with-resection-of-both-whole-splenic-vessels-feasibility-and-laparoscopic-application-to-intraductal-papillary-mucin-producing-tumors-of-the/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/pure-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-notes-with-ultrasonography-guided-transgastric-access-and-over-the-scope-clip-closure-a-porcine-feasibility-and-survival-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/pure-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-notes-with-ultrasonography-guided-transgastric-access-and-over-the-scope-clip-closure-a-porcine-feasibility-and-survival-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 12;
        Authors:  Donat...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 12;</p>
<p>Authors:  Donatsky AM, Andersen L, Nielsen OL, Holzknecht BJ, Vilmann P, Meisner S, Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Most natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures to date rely on the hybrid technique with simultaneous laparoscopic access to protect against access-related complications and to achieve adequate triangulation for dissection. This is done at the cost of the potential benefits of this new minimally invasive technique. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a transgastric (TG) pure-NOTES procedure in a diagnostic setting.                                         METHODS:                       A TG pure-NOTES procedure with endoscopic ultrasonograpy (EUS)-guided access and over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) closure was performed for 10 pigs in a survival and feasibility study. A full macroscopic necropsy with subsequent histologic evaluation was performed on postoperative day (POD) 14. The outcome parameters were uncomplicated follow-up assessment, survival, intraoperative complications, intraabdominal pathology, macroscopic full-thickness closure, and histology-proven full-thickness healing of the gastrotomy.                                         RESULTS:                       An uncomplicated postoperative course was reported for 9 of the 10 pigs, and survival was reported for all 10 pigs. For all the pigs, EUS-guided access was performed successfully with a median duration of 25 min (range, 12-62 min) and without intraoperative complications or access-related lesions at necropsy. An OTSC closure was achieved with a median duration of 11 min (range, 3-28 min). The OTSC provided immediate closure, but according to the authors&#8217; definition of a full-thickness healing evaluated by histologic examination, this was not achieved in any of the cases. Although all the animals survived until POD 14, intraabdominal chronic abscesses were present in 3 of the 10 pigs at necropsy.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The EUS-guided TG access proved to be feasible without access-related complications. Although OTSC provided an immediate closure, the histopathology raised concerns regarding the risk of perforation. Together with the high risk of intraabdominal infection, TG pure-NOTES is not yet ready for routine clinical practice.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22237757 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/pure-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-notes-with-ultrasonography-guided-transgastric-access-and-over-the-scope-clip-closure-a-porcine-feasibility-and-survival-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on long-term oncologic outcomes.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-colorectal-resection-for-cancer-effects-of-conversion-on-long-term-oncologic-outcomes/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-colorectal-resection-for-cancer-effects-of-conversion-on-long-term-oncologic-outcomes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on long-term oncologic outcomes.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 12;
        Authors:  Rottoli M, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Kiran RP
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:         ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on long-term oncologic outcomes.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 12;</p>
<p>Authors:  Rottoli M, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Kiran RP</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The effects of conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on long-term oncologic outcomes still are unclear.                                         METHODS:                       All 450 laparoscopic colorectal resections for cancer performed at a single center between 1994 and 2008 and included in a prospectively maintained database were considered. Patients who required conversion to open surgery (CONV) were matched 1:2 with laparoscopically completed cases (LAP) and 1:5 with open surgery cases (OPEN) for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, year of surgery, tumor location, and tumor stage. Fisher&#8217;s exact, chi-square, and Wilcoxon tests were used as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared to analyze survival.                                         RESULTS:                       In this study, 31 CONV cases were independently compared with 62 LAP and 155 OPEN cases. Compared with the LAP and OPEN patients, the CONV patients were characterized by a numerically higher rate of preoperative comorbidity (61.3% vs LAP, 51.6; P = 0.4 and OPEN, 48.4%; P = 0.2), male gender (77.4% vs LAP, 59.7%; P = 0.09 and OPEN, 58.1%; P = 0.05), and a significantly higher mean body mass index (29.6 vs LAP, 26.8; P = 0.012 and OPEN, 28.8; P = 0.3). The pathologic tumor stage, location, and chemotherapy and radiotherapy rates were comparable among the groups. After a median follow-up period of 4.1, 4.2, and 4.6 years, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was significantly lower for the CONV patients (40.2%) than for the LAP (70.7%, P = 0.01) or the OPEN (63.3%, P = 0.04) patients. However, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were similar among the CONV (94.4%), LAP (86.1%, P = 0.36), and OPEN (84.9%, P = 0.14) patients.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Conversion to open surgery does not affect oncologic outcomes, although CONV patients have increased comorbidity rates affecting long-term mortality.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22237758 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-colorectal-resection-for-cancer-effects-of-conversion-on-long-term-oncologic-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex vivo pig training model for esophageal endosopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/ex-vivo-pig-training-model-for-esophageal-endosopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-endoscopists-with-experience-in-gastric-esd/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/ex-vivo-pig-training-model-for-esophageal-endosopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-endoscopists-with-experience-in-gastric-esd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Ex vivo pig training model for esophageal endosopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;
        Authors:  Tanaka S, Morita Y, Fujita T, Wakahara C, Ikeda A, Toyonaga T...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Ex vivo pig training model for esophageal endosopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;</p>
<p>Authors:  Tanaka S, Morita Y, Fujita T, Wakahara C, Ikeda A, Toyonaga T, Azuma T</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has developed in recent years because of its high rate of en bloc resection. However, for many endoscopists, technical difficulty and risks of complications are great barriers to performing esophageal ESD. In this study, we developed an original training model for esophageal ESD using isolated pig esophagus and assessed this ex vivo model in endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD.                                         METHODS:                       Three endoscopists without experience in esophageal ESD but with some experience in gastric ESD performed esophageal ESD of artificial lesions in 10 consecutive sessions using this ex vivo model. The en bloc resection rate, operation time, number of muscularis propria layer injuries, and presence of perforation were recorded. We evaluated the effectiveness of this training in the three endoscopists by comparing results from the first five sessions (former period) with those from the last five sessions (latter period).                                         RESULTS:                       All three endoscopists achieved en bloc resections in all trials. In the former period, injury to the muscularis propria layer for each of the three endoscopists occurred a mean of 2.2 (1-3), 0.6 (0-1), and 3.2 (1-6) times, respectively. Perforation occurred in one session performed by one endoscopist. In the latter period, the mean number of muscularis propria layer injuries for each of the three endoscopists decreased to 0.2 (0-1), 0.2 (0-1), and 0.8 (0-2), respectively. The time of operation shortened from 35.0 (25-40), 36.4 (30-50), and 29.8 (23-43) min to 23.0 (16-31), 25.6 (23-28), and 29.2 (21-37) min, respectively.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This original ex vivo training model was helpful to endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD in acquiring the basic skills for performing esophageal ESD.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22223113 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/ex-vivo-pig-training-model-for-esophageal-endosopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-endoscopists-with-experience-in-gastric-esd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/revisiting-vascular-patency-after-spleen-preserving-laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy-with-conservation-of-splenic-vessels/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/revisiting-vascular-patency-after-spleen-preserving-laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy-with-conservation-of-splenic-vessels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;
        Authors:  Hwang HK, Chung YE, Kim KA, Kang CM, Lee WJ
        Abstract
    ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;</p>
<p>Authors:  Hwang HK, Chung YE, Kim KA, Kang CM, Lee WJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       We evaluated vascular patency and potential changes in preserved spleens after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) with conservation of both splenic vessels.                                         METHODS:                       We retrospectively analyzed the patency of conserved splenic vessels in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic splenic vessel-conserving SPDP from January 2006 to August 2010. The patency of the conserved splenic vessels was evaluated by abdominal computed tomography and classified into three grades according to the degree of severity.                                         RESULTS:                       Among 30 patients with splenic vessel-conserving laparoscopic SPDP, 29 patients with complete follow-up data were included in this study. During the follow-up period (median: 13.2 months), grades 1 and 2 splenic arterial obliteration were observed in one patient each. A total of five patients (17.2%) showed grade 1 or 2 obliteration in conserved splenic veins. Most patients (82.8%) had patent conserved splenic vein. Four patients (13.8%) eventually developed collateral venous vessels around gastric fundus and reserved spleen, but no spleen infarction was found, and none presented clinical relevant symptoms, such as variceal bleeding. There was no statistical difference in vascular patency between the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P &gt; 0.05).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Most patients showed intact vascular patency in conserved splenic vessels and no secondary changes in the preserved spleen after laparoscopic splenic vessel-conserving SPDP.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22223114 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/revisiting-vascular-patency-after-spleen-preserving-laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy-with-conservation-of-splenic-vessels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-transabdominal-preperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-using-needlescopic-instruments-a-15-year-single-center-experience-in-317-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-transabdominal-preperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-using-needlescopic-instruments-a-15-year-single-center-experience-in-317-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;
        Authors:  Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miya...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;</p>
<p>Authors:  Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miyaki Y, Tochikubo J, Inamori K, Shiiya N</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is associated with a decrease in postoperative pain, shortened hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, and decrease in chronic pain. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery performed with needlescopic instruments has more advantages than conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, there are few reports of large-scale laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments (nTAPP). This report reviews our experiences with 352 nTAPP in 317 patients during the 15-year period from April 1996 to April 2011.                                         METHODS:                       We performed nTAPP as the method of choice in 88.5% of all patients presenting with inguinal hernia. To perform the nTAPP, 3-mm instruments were used. A 5-mm laparoscope was inserted from the umbilicus, and surgical instruments were inserted through 5- and 3-mm trocars. After reduction of the hernia sac and dissection of the preperitoneal space, we placed polyester mesh or polypropylene soft mesh with staple fixation. The peritoneum was closed with 3-0 silk interrupted sutures.                                         RESULTS:                       The mean operative time was 102.9 min for unilateral hernias and 155.8 min for bilateral hernias. There was no conversion to open repair. Forty-three patients (13.6%) used postoperative analgesics, and the mean frequency of use was 0.5 times. Regarding intraoperative complications, we observed one bladder injury, but no bowel injuries or major vessel injuries. Postoperative complications occurred in 32 patients (10.1%). One patient with a retained lipoma required reoperation. There was no incidence of chronic pain or mesh infection. The operative time for experienced surgeons (≥20 repairs) was significantly shorter than that of inexperienced surgeons (&lt;20 repairs; P &lt; 0.05).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The nTAPP was a safe and useful technique for inguinal hernia repair. Large prospective, randomized controlled trials will be required to establish the benefit of nTAPP.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22223115 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-transabdominal-preperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-using-needlescopic-instruments-a-15-year-single-center-experience-in-317-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery on training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/impact-of-the-english-national-training-programme-for-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-on-training-opportunities-for-senior-colorectal-trainees/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/impact-of-the-english-national-training-programme-for-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-on-training-opportunities-for-senior-colorectal-trainees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Impact of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery on training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;
        Authors:  Hemandas AK, Zeidan S, Flashman KG, Khan JS, P...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Impact of the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery on training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;</p>
<p>Authors:  Hemandas AK, Zeidan S, Flashman KG, Khan JS, Parvaiz A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       There is growing concern that the recently introduced National Training Programme for consultants in laparoscopic colorectal surgery will have a negative impact on the training of senior colorectal trainees by minimizing the opportunities available. This study aimed to determine the impact that local implementation of the National Training Programme has had on the operating experience of senior colorectal trainees.                                         METHODS:                       A prospective study was conducted at a designated national training center for laparoscopic colorectal surgery based in a large district general hospital in England, United Kingdom. All patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our unit between October 2006-September 2008 and October 2008-September 2010 were included in the study. The study variables included number and type of procedure, patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, body mass index, conversion rates, previous abdominal surgery, and median operating time. The main outcome measure was the number of procedures performed by senior colorectal trainees before and after commencement of National Training Programme training in October 2008.                                         RESULTS:                       A total of 746 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed. Senior colorectal trainees performed 175 cases before commencement of the National Training Programme and 184 cases afterward. The difference was not significant. National Training Programme consultants performed 126 cases. Data were analyzed using Fisher&#8217;s exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. The study groups were found to be well matched. The median operating time was significantly longer after commencement of the National Training Programme. The study was limited in terms of ability to extrapolate results to smaller units wishing to participate in training programs.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Implementation of the National Training Programme in our hospital has not had a negative impact on the training opportunities for senior colorectal trainees. However, any unit wishing to participate in the National Training Programme must ensure that an adequate operative caseload and extra resources for operative lists are available for training.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22223116 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/impact-of-the-english-national-training-programme-for-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery-on-training-opportunities-for-senior-colorectal-trainees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Histology classification challenges for the endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/histology-classification-challenges-for-the-endoscopic-treatment-of-early-gastric-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/histology-classification-challenges-for-the-endoscopic-treatment-of-early-gastric-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hottenrott C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Histology classification challenges for the endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;
        Authors:  Hottenrott C
        PMID: 22223117 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Histology classification challenges for the endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 6;</p>
<p>Authors:  Hottenrott C</p>
<p>PMID: 22223117 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/histology-classification-challenges-for-the-endoscopic-treatment-of-early-gastric-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oxidants as important determinants of renal apoptosis during pneumoperitoneum: a study in an isolated perfused rat kidney model.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/oxidants-as-important-determinants-of-renal-apoptosis-during-pneumoperitoneum-a-study-in-an-isolated-perfused-rat-kidney-model/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/oxidants-as-important-determinants-of-renal-apoptosis-during-pneumoperitoneum-a-study-in-an-isolated-perfused-rat-kidney-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Oxidants as important determinants of renal apoptosis during pneumoperitoneum: a study in an isolated perfused rat kidney model.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Khoury W, Weinbroum AA
        Abstract
        INTRODUCTION...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Oxidants as important determinants of renal apoptosis during pneumoperitoneum: a study in an isolated perfused rat kidney model.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Khoury W, Weinbroum AA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION:                       Pneumoperitoneum-associated ischemia-reperfusion (IR) may initiate renal dysfunction. Whether oxidants are responsible for renal structural damage, such as cell apoptosis, has not yet been evaluated. We investigated such eventuality in an isolated rat kidney model.                                         METHODS:                       Thirty-five rat kidneys with their vessels and ureter were harvested and perfused within a closed environment at flow of 15 ml min(-1). After stabilization, kidneys were assigned to one of five groups (n = 7 per group): CO(2)-induced intrachamber pressure of 8, 12, or 0 mmHg (control), and 8 or 12 mmHg pressure applied to kidneys from rats treated pre-experimentally with tungsten for 14 days. Pressurization lasted 60 min.                                         RESULTS:                       Organ perfusion pressure raised as intrachamber pressure increased. Urinary output decreased in the two pressurized nonpretreated groups. Intrachamber pressure was directly associated with an increase in postexperimental xanthine oxidase tissue levels. Twofold apoptosis was documented (p &lt; 0.05) in cortex of nonpretreated kidney in the 12 mmHg group compared with the 8 or 0 mmHg groups. Tungsten pretreatment significantly (p &lt; 0.05) attenuated the abnormalities documented in the 12 mmHg group, but less so in the 8 mmHg pressurized nontreated counterparts.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Pneumoperitoneal pressure applied to isolated perfused kidney is associated with renal apoptosis. This rapidly induced structural renal damage is oxidant dependent and can be attenuated by antioxidants. Further studies may shed more light on the role of antioxidants in preventing pneumoperitoneum-induced kidney dysfunction.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179442 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/oxidants-as-important-determinants-of-renal-apoptosis-during-pneumoperitoneum-a-study-in-an-isolated-perfused-rat-kidney-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colectomy for cancer: a matched case-control study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/systemic-inflammatory-response-after-laparoscopic-and-conventional-colectomy-for-cancer-a-matched-case-control-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/systemic-inflammatory-response-after-laparoscopic-and-conventional-colectomy-for-cancer-a-matched-case-control-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colectomy for cancer: a matched case-control study.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Tsamis D, Theodoropoulos G, Stamopoulos P, Siakavellas S, Delistathi T...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colectomy for cancer: a matched case-control study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Tsamis D, Theodoropoulos G, Stamopoulos P, Siakavellas S, Delistathi T, Michalopoulos NV, Zografos GC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Studies dealing with laparoscopic colectomy for cancer have reached conflicting results in regards to various inflammatory cytokines. Most of them have not examined potential differences with the open procedures at later postoperative days, when the immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery would be more demanding to demonstrate (for earlier administration of adjuvant treatment). The aim of this work is to detect differences of proinflammatory cytokines between conventional and laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.                                         PATIENTS AND METHODS:                       30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy were age, sex, and preoperative stage-matched with 30 patients treated by open surgery. C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-1, -6, and -8, and interferon (IFN)-γ serum levels were measured preoperatively, at 24 h, and at the 7th postoperative day (POD).                                         RESULTS:                       CRP and IL-6 postoperative values (24 h and 7th POD) were significantly higher than baseline for both groups (p = 0.001), but the respective values at the 7th POD were less than at 24 h (p = 0.001). IL-1 and -8 levels did not show any differences between assessment timepoints. A higher IFN-γ measurement was demonstrated at 24 h compared with baseline for the laparoscopic group only (p = 0.03). This difference was not maintained at the 7th POD. IFN-γ levels at 24 h and the 7th POD were significantly less for the open compared with the laparoscopic group of patients (p = 0.001). No correlation was revealed between measured serum values and age, sex, tumor location, or stage.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This matched case-control study verifies the already reported lack of differences regarding IL-1. Controversy still exists on likely IL-6 differences. The inadequately studied IL-8 does not seem to play an important role in immunologic differences. The immunologically beneficial IFN-γ, produced by the principal effectors of cell-mediated immunity Th1 cells, seems to have a more active presence following laparoscopic colectomy, potentially contributing to an immunologic &#8220;advantage&#8221; by counteracting &#8220;harmful&#8221; cytokines, such as IL-1.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179443 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/systemic-inflammatory-response-after-laparoscopic-and-conventional-colectomy-for-cancer-a-matched-case-control-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/cost-of-laparoscopy-and-laparotomy-in-the-surgical-treatment-of-colorectal-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/cost-of-laparoscopy-and-laparotomy-in-the-surgical-treatment-of-colorectal-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Cost of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Berto P, Lopatriello S, Aiello A, Corcione F, Spinoglio G, Trapani V, Melotti G
        Abstract
        B...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Cost of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Berto P, Lopatriello S, Aiello A, Corcione F, Spinoglio G, Trapani V, Melotti G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The comparative costs of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical resection of colorectal cancer, especially of the hospital provider, have not yet been assessed in the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare System. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing economic information on this research topic of growing relevance at a time of reduced healthcare budgets.                                         METHODS:                       Three Italian reference centres retrospectively provided from their databases data on 90 cases of laparotomy (OP) or laparoscopy (LAP) interventions for right colon (RCol), left colon/sigma (LCol) and rectum (Rec). Costs were retrieved according to phases of the in-hospital procedure: pre-operative, operative and post-operative phase, including diagnostic work-up, hospital length of stay, duration of intervention, theatre occupation time, type of anaesthesia, medical devices and drugs used and staff time throughout the management process from hospital admission to discharge. The cost estimation was carried out using a microcosting, bottom-up technique, and statistical analysis was carried out using appropriate techniques.                                         RESULTS:                       The average cost of colorectal surgery was &lt;euro&gt;10,539/patient (median &lt;euro&gt;10,396) with rectum procedures being statistically more costly than colon procedures (mean Rec &lt;euro&gt;12,562/patient versus LCol &lt;euro&gt;9,054 and RCol &lt;euro&gt;10,002; median &lt;euro&gt;11,704 versus &lt;euro&gt;8,941 and &lt;euro&gt;9,513, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001). The average cost per patient did not differ between the two procedures for colon interventions, whereas a statistically significant difference was found for rectum procedures (LAP &lt;euro&gt;11,617 versus OP &lt;euro&gt;13,506; median &lt;euro&gt;11,563 versus &lt;euro&gt;12,568; p = 0.0442). The national diagnosis related groups (DRG) tariff is insufficient to remunerate the providers&#8217; activity, irrespective of the type of disease (surgical site) and surgical technique adopted.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Colorectal cancer surgery is a costly procedure, and in-patient DRG tariffs are currently insufficient to cover the cost of its management for Italian hospital providers.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179444 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/cost-of-laparoscopy-and-laparotomy-in-the-surgical-treatment-of-colorectal-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/magnetic-air-capsule-robotic-system-proof-of-concept-of-a-novel-approach-for-painless-colonoscopy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/magnetic-air-capsule-robotic-system-proof-of-concept-of-a-novel-approach-for-painless-colonoscopy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Valdastri P, Ciuti G, Verbeni A, Menciassi A, Dario P, Arezzo A, Morino M
        Abstrac...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Valdastri P, Ciuti G, Verbeni A, Menciassi A, Dario P, Arezzo A, Morino M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Despite being considered the most effective method for colorectal cancer diagnosis, colonoscopy take-up as a mass-screening procedure is limited mainly due to invasiveness, patient discomfort, fear of pain, and the need for sedation. In an effort to mitigate some of the disadvantages associated with colonoscopy, this work provides a preliminary assessment of a novel endoscopic device consisting in a softly tethered capsule for painless colonoscopy under robotic magnetic steering.                                         METHODS:                       The proposed platform consists of the endoscopic device, a robotic unit, and a control box. In contrast to the traditional insertion method (i.e., pushing from behind), a &#8220;front-wheel&#8221; propulsion approach is proposed. A compliant tether connecting the device to an external box is used to provide insufflation, passing a flexible operative tool, enabling lens cleaning, and operating the vision module. To assess the diagnostic and treatment ability of the platform, 12 users were asked to find and remove artificially implanted beads as polyp surrogates in an ex vivo model. In vivo testing consisted of a qualitative study of the platform in pigs, focusing on active locomotion, diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, safety, and usability.                                         RESULTS:                       The mean percentage of beads identified by each user during ex vivo trials was 85 ± 11%. All the identified beads were removed successfully using the polypectomy loop. The mean completion time for accomplishing the entire procedure was 678 ± 179 s. No immediate mucosal damage, acute complications such as perforation, or delayed adverse consequences were observed following application of the proposed method in vivo.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Use of the proposed platform in ex vivo and preliminary animal studies indicates that it is safe and operates effectively in a manner similar to a standard colonoscope. These studies served to demonstrate the platform&#8217;s added advantages of reduced size, front-wheel drive strategy, and robotic control over locomotion and orientation.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179445 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/magnetic-air-capsule-robotic-system-proof-of-concept-of-a-novel-approach-for-painless-colonoscopy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/3d-hd-versus-2d-hd-surgical-task-efficiency-in-standardised-phantom-tasks/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/3d-hd-versus-2d-hd-surgical-task-efficiency-in-standardised-phantom-tasks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                       Common video...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Common video systems for laparoscopy provide the surgeon a two-dimensional image (2D), where information on spatial depth can be derived only from secondary spatial depth cues and experience. Although the advantage of stereoscopy for surgical task efficiency has been clearly shown, several attempts to introduce three-dimensional (3D) video systems into clinical routine have failed. The aim of this study is to evaluate users&#8217; performances in standardised surgical phantom model tasks using 3D HD visualisation compared with 2D HD regarding precision and working speed.                                         METHODS:                       This comparative study uses a 3D HD video system consisting of a dual-channel laparoscope, a stereoscopic camera, a camera controller with two separate outputs and a wavelength multiplex stereoscopic monitor. Each of 20 medical students and 10 laparoscopically experienced surgeons (more than 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies each) pre-selected in a stereo vision test were asked to perform one task to familiarise themselves with the system and subsequently a set of five standardised tasks encountered in typical surgical procedures. The tasks were performed under either 3D or 2D conditions at random choice and subsequently repeated under the other vision condition. Predefined errors were counted, and time needed was measured.                                         RESULTS:                       In four of the five tasks the study participants made fewer mistakes in 3D than in 2D vision. In four of the tasks they needed significantly more time in the 2D mode. Both the student group and the surgeon group showed similarly improved performance, while the surgeon group additionally saved more time on difficult tasks.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This study shows that 3D HD using a state-of-the-art 3D monitor permits superior task efficiency, even as compared with the latest 2D HD video systems.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179446 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/3d-hd-versus-2d-hd-surgical-task-efficiency-in-standardised-phantom-tasks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/in-vivo-mri-visualization-of-mesh-shrinkage-using-surgical-implants-loaded-with-superparamagnetic-iron-oxides/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/in-vivo-mri-visualization-of-mesh-shrinkage-using-surgical-implants-loaded-with-superparamagnetic-iron-oxides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Kuehnert N, Kraemer NA, Otto J, Donker HC, Slabu I, Baumann M, Kuhl CK, Klinge...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kuehnert N, Kraemer NA, Otto J, Donker HC, Slabu I, Baumann M, Kuhl CK, Klinge U</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Prosthetic mesh implants are widely used in hernia surgery. To show long-term mesh-related complications such as shrinkage or adhesions, a precise visualization of meshes and their vicinity in vivo is important. By supplementing mesh fibers with ferro particles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help to delineate the mesh itself. This study aimed to demonstrate and quantify time-dependent mesh shrinkage in vivo by MRI.                                         METHODS:                       Polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) meshes with incorporated superparamagnetic iron oxides (SPIOs) were implanted as an abdominal wall replacement in 30 rats. On days 1, 7, 14, or 21, MRI was performed using a gradient echo sequence with repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) of 50/4.6 and a flip angle of 20°. The length, width, and area of the device were measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal images, and geometric deformations were assessed by surgical explantation.                                         RESULTS:                       In all cases, the meshes were visualized and their area estimated by measuring the length and width of the mesh. The MRI presented a mean area shrinkage in vivo of 13% on day 7, 23% on day 14, and 23% on day 21. Postmortem measurements differed statistically from MRI, with a mean area shrinkage of 23% on day 7, 28% on day 14, and 30% on day 21. Ex vivo measurements of shrinkage showed in vivo measurements to be overestimated approximately 8%. Delineation of the mesh helped to show folding or adhesions close to the intestine.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Loading of surgical meshes with SPIOs allows their precise visualization during MRI and guarantees an accurate in vivo assessment of their shrinkage. The authors&#8217; observation clearly indicates that shrinkage in vivo is remarkably less than that shown by illustrated explantation measurements. The use of MRI with such meshes could be a reliable technique for checking on proper operation of implanted meshes and showing related complications, obviating the need for exploratory open surgical revision.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179447 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/in-vivo-mri-visualization-of-mesh-shrinkage-using-surgical-implants-loaded-with-superparamagnetic-iron-oxides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/does-previous-laparoscopic-experience-improve-ability-to-perform-single-incision-laparoscopic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/does-previous-laparoscopic-experience-improve-ability-to-perform-single-incision-laparoscopic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery?
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Lewis T, Aggarwal R, Kwasnicki R, Darzi A, Paraskeva P
        Abstract
        BACKGR...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lewis T, Aggarwal R, Kwasnicki R, Darzi A, Paraskeva P</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Single-site laparoscopic surgery (SSLS) has been suggested as a safe and less invasive alternative to standard laparoscopic surgery (LAP). It is not clear whether previous laparoscopic experience influences the ability to perform SSLS. This study aimed to assess the impact of laparoscopic experience on the performance of SSLS.                                         METHODS:                       For this study, 18 surgeons were recruited including 12 novice surgeons, four experienced laparoscopic surgeons (intermediate) and two experienced SSLS surgeons (expert). All these subjects completed four tasks from the validated Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) curriculum. The tasks were performed using both a LAP and an SSLS approach with a randomized crossover design. Assessment of the tasks was performed with standardized FLS metrics and dexterity analysis using the Imperial college surgical assessment device.                                         RESULTS:                       The novice group performed two tasks (precision cutting and intracorporeal suture) significantly better with a LAP approach than with an SSLS approach in all parameters (P &lt; 0.05). The two other tasks (peg transfer and endoloop) were performed significantly better with LAP than with SSLS in terms of time and dexterity only (P &lt; 0.05) but not in terms of error score. The intermediate and expert groups demonstrated no significant difference between their LAP and SSLS performances for any of the tasks in any parameter. Intergroup analysis of performance demonstrated construct validity of the SSLS tasks, with significant differences between novice and intermediate performances for three tasks (peg transfer, endoloop, and intracorporeal suture) (P &lt; 0.05) and between novice and expert performances for three tasks (peg transfer, precision cutting, and intracorporeal suture) (P &lt; 0.05).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This study demonstrated that previous laparoscopic experience improves ability to perform SSLS tasks. Some SSLS tasks do not show construct validity due to the complexity of the SSLS technique. It also is implied that current LAP technical skills training curricula are insufficient for teaching SSLS.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179448 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/does-previous-laparoscopic-experience-improve-ability-to-perform-single-incision-laparoscopic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Serum leptin levels are inversely correlated with omental gene expression of adiponectin and markedly decreased after gastric bypass surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/serum-leptin-levels-are-inversely-correlated-with-omental-gene-expression-of-adiponectin-and-markedly-decreased-after-gastric-bypass-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/serum-leptin-levels-are-inversely-correlated-with-omental-gene-expression-of-adiponectin-and-markedly-decreased-after-gastric-bypass-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Serum leptin levels are inversely correlated with omental gene expression of adiponectin and markedly decreased after gastric bypass surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Chen J, Pamuklar Z, Spagnoli A, Torquati A
    ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Serum leptin levels are inversely correlated with omental gene expression of adiponectin and markedly decreased after gastric bypass surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Chen J, Pamuklar Z, Spagnoli A, Torquati A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Adipose tissue is the most abundant endocrine tissue in the body, producing leptin, a hormone important in regulating hunger, and adiponectin, a hormone involved in insulin sensitivity and inflammation. This study aimed to assess the impact of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) on leptin levels and its relation to the adipose tissue expression of adiponectin.                                         METHODS:                       Omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue and serum were obtained from 40 obese patients undergoing GBS, from 13 patients 1 year or more after GBS, and from 16 non-obese individuals with a body mass index of 20 to 29 kg/m(2). Adiponectin gene expression was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the gene expression was normalized for the GAPDH gene. Serum leptin and adiponectin were measured by a high-sensitivity enzymatic assay.                                         RESULTS:                       Leptin levels were significantly lower in the post-GBS patients (19.8 ± 6.7) than in the pre-GBS patients (59.0 ± 5.1; P = 0.0001), and similar to those in the non-obese control subjects (18.2 ± 4; P = 0.8). Univariate analysis showed an inverse correlation between serum leptin levels and omental adiponectin gene expression (r = -0.32; P = 0.01).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Gastric bypass surgery results in resolution of the leptin resistance status that characterizes obese subjects. The study also demonstrated a significant correlation between leptin and adiponectin. This correlation provides preliminary evidence for studying a potential adiponectin-leptin cross-talking that may represent one of the physiologic pathways responsible for the regulation of food intake in humans.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179449 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/serum-leptin-levels-are-inversely-correlated-with-omental-gene-expression-of-adiponectin-and-markedly-decreased-after-gastric-bypass-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extreme bariatric endoscopy: stenting to reconnect the pouch to the gastrojejunostomy after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/extreme-bariatric-endoscopy-stenting-to-reconnect-the-pouch-to-the-gastrojejunostomy-after-a-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/extreme-bariatric-endoscopy-stenting-to-reconnect-the-pouch-to-the-gastrojejunostomy-after-a-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Extreme bariatric endoscopy: stenting to reconnect the pouch to the gastrojejunostomy after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  de Moura EG, Galvão-Neto MP, Ramos AC, de Moura ET, Galvão TD, de M...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Extreme bariatric endoscopy: stenting to reconnect the pouch to the gastrojejunostomy after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  de Moura EG, Galvão-Neto MP, Ramos AC, de Moura ET, Galvão TD, de Moura DT, Ferreira FC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Among the possible complications of bariatric surgery, fistula and partial dehiscence of the gastric suture are well known. Reoperation often is required but results in significant morbidity. Endoscopic treatment of some bariatric complications is feasible and efficient.                                         METHODS:                       A modified metallic stent was placed between the gastroaesophageal junction and the alimentary jejunal limb, allowing the passage of a nasoenteric feeding tube into the jejunal limb.                                         RESULTS:                       Endoscopy showed disruption of nearly the entire staple line at the gastric pouch. The modified stent was placed and allowed wound healing. After 31 days, the stent had migrated and was removed endoscopically. Total clousure of the fistula was reported 30 days afterward.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Endoscopic treatment of some bariatric surgery complications is feasible and has been reported previously. This report presents a case of a serious leakage treated by placement of a self-expandable metal stent to bridge the fistula.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179450 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/extreme-bariatric-endoscopy-stenting-to-reconnect-the-pouch-to-the-gastrojejunostomy-after-a-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-outcomes-and-costs-between-laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy-and-open-resection-at-a-single-center/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-outcomes-and-costs-between-laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy-and-open-resection-at-a-single-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Fox AM, Pitzul K, Bhojani F, Kaplan M, Moulton CA, Wei AC, McGilvray I, Cl...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Fox AM, Pitzul K, Bhojani F, Kaplan M, Moulton CA, Wei AC, McGilvray I, Cleary S, Okrainec A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The cost implications of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and a detailed breakdown of hospital expenditures has not been presented in the literature to date. This study aimed to compare hospital costs and short-term clinical outcomes between LDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).                                         METHODS:                       The authors evaluated all the distal pancreatic resections performed at their center between January 2004 and March 2010. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analysis was used to compare hospital departmental and total hospital costs as well as oncologic and surgical outcomes.                                         RESULTS:                       A total of 118 cases (42 laparoscopic resections, including 5 conversions, and 76 open resections) were analyzed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups except for a predominance of females in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.036). The indications for surgery differed by a paucity of malignant tumors being approached laparoscopically (P &lt; 0.001). Intraoperatively, there were no differences in estimated blood loss, operating room time, or transfusion requirement. The pathologic outcomes did not differ significantly. The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5 days (range 3-31 days) for the LDP cohort and 7 days (range 4-19 days) for the ODP cohort (P &lt; 0.001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred for 22 patients, with a higher proportion observed in the LDP group (28.57%; n = 12) than in the open group (13.16%; n = 10; P = 0.05). However, the rates for grade B and higher grade fistula were higher in the ODP group (0 LDP and 4 ODP). The median preadmission and operative costs did not differ significantly. The ODP cohort had significantly higher costs in all other hospital departments, including the total cost.                                         CONCLUSION:                       LDP is both a cost-effective and safe approach for distal pancreatic lesions. This series showed a shorter LOS and lower total hospital costs for LDP than for ODP, accompanied by equivalent postoperative outcomes.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179451 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-outcomes-and-costs-between-laparoscopic-distal-pancreatectomy-and-open-resection-at-a-single-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video-assisted thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/video-assisted-thoracoscopic-transdiaphragmatic-liver-resection-for-hepatocellular-carcinoma/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/video-assisted-thoracoscopic-transdiaphragmatic-liver-resection-for-hepatocellular-carcinoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Video-assisted thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Cloyd JM, Visser BC
        Abstract
        Because of technical complexity, concern for vascu...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Video-assisted thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Cloyd JM, Visser BC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        Because of technical complexity, concern for vascular control, and uncertainty in regard to oncologic outcome, the application of minimally invasive techniques to liver surgery has been slower than in most other abdominal procedures. This is despite well-known advantages with respect to postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, and recovery time. Although laparoscopic liver surgery has recently become more common, the majority of laparoscopic liver resections comprise anterolateral wedge resections and left lateral sectorectomies. Laparoscopic resections of the posterosuperior segments are more difficult and few reports are available in the literature. Compared to laparoscopy, gaining access to tumors in the dome of the liver may be more easily obtained via thoracoscopy, thereby preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. This technical report describes two cases of hepatocellular carcinoma in segments VII and VIII resected via a video-assisted thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179452 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/video-assisted-thoracoscopic-transdiaphragmatic-liver-resection-for-hepatocellular-carcinoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-for-patients-with-perforated-peptic-ulcer/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-for-patients-with-perforated-peptic-ulcer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Bonin EA, Moran E, Gostout CJ, McConico AL, Zielinski M, Bingener J
        Abstract
        BACKG...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Bonin EA, Moran E, Gostout CJ, McConico AL, Zielinski M, Bingener J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Perforation accounts for 70% of deaths attributed to peptic ulcers. Laparoscopic repair is effective but infrequently used. Our aim was to assess how many patients with perforated peptic ulcer could be candidates for a transluminal endoscopic omental patch closure.                                         METHODS:                       This retrospective study reviewed patients with perforated peptic ulcer from 2005 to 2010. Demographics, ulcer characteristics, operative procedure, and outcomes were recorded. Candidates for endoscopic transluminal repair were defined as those having undergone omental patch closure of an ulcer of appropriate size and no contraindications to laparoscopy or endoscopy.                                         RESULTS:                       In the retrospective review, a total of 104 patients were identified; 62% female, mean age = 68 years, mean ASA of 3, and 63% medication-related ulcers. Fifty-nine (63%) had an omental patch (80% open), and 35 (37%) had other procedures. Ten patients had nonoperative management. Thirty-day mortality was 14% and 1 year mortality was 35%. Forty-nine patients (52%) were considered potential candidates for transluminal repair.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Sixty-three percent of our patients sustained a medication-related perforation with 1 year mortality of 35%. The majority of patients were treated using open omental patch repair. Transluminal endoscopic repair may provide an additional situation for a minimally invasive approach for a number of these patients.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179453 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-for-patients-with-perforated-peptic-ulcer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/what-is-the-best-reconstruction-method-after-distal-gastrectomy-for-gastric-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/what-is-the-best-reconstruction-method-after-distal-gastrectomy-for-gastric-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer?
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Kim N, Lee WW
        Abstract
        BACKGROU...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Kim N, Lee WW</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       We performed this prospective randomized study to evaluate what is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.                                         METHODS:                       One hundred fifty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted or open gastrectomy for gastric cancer were analyzed from March 2006 to August 2007. Billroth I (B-I) anastomosis, Billroth II (B-II) with Braun anastomosis, and Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis were applied randomly. Additionally, the patients were divided into two groups based on treatment type: laparoscopic and open operation. Endoscopy and hepatobiliary scans were performed to investigate gastric stasis and enterogastric reflux. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) was used to evaluate postoperative quality of life, and the hematologic test was used to assess nutritional aspect.                                         RESULTS:                       Endoscopy revealed that reflux after the R-Y anastomosis procedure was significantly less frequent than after the other anastomosis types at 12 months. Comparison of the GIQLI and the nutritional parameters between the reconstruction types revealed that there were no differences, but a significantly higher GIQLI score was observed in the laparoscopic group immediately following the procedure (P = 0.042).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       R-Y anastomosis is superior to B-I and B-II with Braun anastomosis in terms of frequency of bile reflux, despite the fact that there is no difference in the postoperative quality-of-life index and nutritional status between reconstructive procedures. The laparoscopic approach is the better option than open surgery in terms of QOL in the immediate postoperative period.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179454 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/what-is-the-best-reconstruction-method-after-distal-gastrectomy-for-gastric-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/prospective-evaluation-of-peritoneal-fluid-contamination-following-transabdominal-vs-transanal-specimen-extraction-in-laparoscopic-left-sided-colorectal-resections/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/prospective-evaluation-of-peritoneal-fluid-contamination-following-transabdominal-vs-transanal-specimen-extraction-in-laparoscopic-left-sided-colorectal-resections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Costantino FA, Diana M,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Costantino FA, Diana M, Wall J, Leroy J, Mutter D, Marescaux J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in colorectal surgery prevents the need for an enlarged port site or minilaparotomy to extract the surgical specimen. The downside of this technique may be an increased risk of bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity from the external milieu. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the peritoneal bacterial contamination in NOSE and non-NOSE laparoscopic colorectal procedures.                                         METHODS:                       Consecutive patients operated for sigmoid diverticulitis with laparoscopic approach and transanal extraction of the specimen from January to December 2010 at our university hospital were enrolled. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in the same study period with conventional specimen extraction were used as reference. Peritoneal fluid samples were collected under sterile conditions at the end of the procedure and sent for gram stain as well as anaerobic, aerobic, and fungal cultures.                                         RESULTS:                       Twenty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis with transanal NOSE, while 9 patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with conventional specimen extraction during the same period. The two groups were successfully matched 1:2 (17 NOSE and 9 non-NOSE) according age, sex, ASA, and Charlson comorbidity score. The contamination rate of peritoneal fluid was 100% vs. 88.9% in NOSE and non-NOSE procedures, respectively (P = 0.23). Overall and major complications rates were 27.6% vs. 11.10% (P = 0.41) and 5.08% vs. 11.1% (P = 1) in NOSE vs. non-NOSE procedures, respectively. In the NOSE group there was a statistically significant lower consumption of oral paracetamol (P = 0.007) and of oral tramadol (P = 0.02).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Although a higher peritoneal contamination was found in the NOSE procedures, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes relative to standard approach. Avoiding a minilaparotomy to extract the specimen resulted in a significantly lower postoperative analgesic requirement in the NOSE group.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179455 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/prospective-evaluation-of-peritoneal-fluid-contamination-following-transabdominal-vs-transanal-specimen-extraction-in-laparoscopic-left-sided-colorectal-resections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Novel technique for intraoperative tumor localization during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: endoscopic autologous blood tattooing.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/novel-technique-for-intraoperative-tumor-localization-during-totally-laparoscopic-distal-gastrectomy-endoscopic-autologous-blood-tattooing/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/novel-technique-for-intraoperative-tumor-localization-during-totally-laparoscopic-distal-gastrectomy-endoscopic-autologous-blood-tattooing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Novel technique for intraoperative tumor localization during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: endoscopic autologous blood tattooing.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Jeong O, Cho SB, Joo YE, Ryu SY, Park YK
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Novel technique for intraoperative tumor localization during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: endoscopic autologous blood tattooing.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Jeong O, Cho SB, Joo YE, Ryu SY, Park YK</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Knowledge of the intraoperative location of lesions is a prerequisite for deciding the proper extent of gastric resection or the choice of anastomosis technique during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for early gastric cancer (EGC). In this study we introduce a novel tumor localization method for TLDG: endoscopic blood tattooing.                                         METHODS:                       Twenty-three consecutive patients scheduled for TLDG for EGC were enrolled in this prospective study. The day before surgery, 2-3 ml of autologous blood was injected into the gastric muscle layer at 3-4 cm proximal to the lesion during endoscopy.                                         RESULTS:                       The study subjects consisted of 15 males and 8 females with a mean age of 61 ± 10.4 years. During surgery, the endoscopic blood tattooed sites were successfully identified in all 23 patients. No complications associated with the procedure occurred, and no patient had microscopic residual tumor cells at the proximal resection margin, with a mean proximal margin length of 3.3 ± 2.7 cm. Eighteen patients underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, four patients with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy, and one patient with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. At final pathologic examinations, 20 patients were of stage IA and 3 were of stage IB according to the UICC TNM classification (6th ed.).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Endoscopic blood tattooing provides a simple and useful means of localizing lesions during TLDG for EGC. Although the superiority of this technique over other localization methods needs to be evaluated further, the authors recommend endoscopic blood tattooing as an alternative to other intraoperative localization methods for laparoscopic surgery for EGC.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179456 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/novel-technique-for-intraoperative-tumor-localization-during-totally-laparoscopic-distal-gastrectomy-endoscopic-autologous-blood-tattooing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diagnostic laparoscopy and preoperative planning in ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins: a surgical first, with detailed demonstration of the complex anatomical relationships.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/diagnostic-laparoscopy-and-preoperative-planning-in-ischiopagus-tripus-conjoined-twins-a-surgical-first-with-detailed-demonstration-of-the-complex-anatomical-relationships/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/diagnostic-laparoscopy-and-preoperative-planning-in-ischiopagus-tripus-conjoined-twins-a-surgical-first-with-detailed-demonstration-of-the-complex-anatomical-relationships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Diagnostic laparoscopy and preoperative planning in ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins: a surgical first, with detailed demonstration of the complex anatomical relationships.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Blanco FC, Dav...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Diagnostic laparoscopy and preoperative planning in ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins: a surgical first, with detailed demonstration of the complex anatomical relationships.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Blanco FC, Davenport KP, Kane TD, Losee JE, Schneck FX</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Diagnosis and management of conjoined twins are constantly evolving [1]. New imaging techniques provide important anatomic details and help in planning the separation procedure [2, 3]. Despite these technological advances, however, the complex arrangement of conjoined organs is somewhat difficult to interpret, leaving unresolved questions at time of surgery. The authors present a video demonstrating laparoscopy as an adjunct in the preoperative planning of separation of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins as well as illustrating the complex anatomy in a combination of video, drawings, and radiologic imaging. To date, this is the first time that laparoscopy has been used in preoperative assessment of conjoined twins.                                         METHODS:                       After elective cesarean delivery, ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins were thoroughly evaluated with conventional imaging, including plain radiographs and computed tomography scan with three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction images. The anatomy of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts was further defined with barium enema, retrograde pyelography, and cystoscopy. In addition to these tests, diagnostic laparoscopy was performed at time of tissue expander placement. An angled scope, introduced through a 5-mm umbilical port, was used to visualize the intraperitoneal organs as well as all accessible retroperitoneal structures.                                         RESULTS:                       Laparoscopy provided useful information regarding the bowel distribution between the twins. In addition, it helped demonstrate the relationship of shared solid organs with other intra-abdominal structures and identify anatomic landmarks used in the subsequent separation of the twins. Finally, laparoscopy helped confirm the presence, number, and morphology of the internal female genitalia.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful tool in evaluation of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins. It is an important adjunct to preoperative studies in preparing for an expeditious and safe separation procedure.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179457 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/diagnostic-laparoscopy-and-preoperative-planning-in-ischiopagus-tripus-conjoined-twins-a-surgical-first-with-detailed-demonstration-of-the-complex-anatomical-relationships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Serous cyst adenoma of the pancreas: appraisal of active surgical strategy before it causes problems.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/serous-cyst-adenoma-of-the-pancreas-appraisal-of-active-surgical-strategy-before-it-causes-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/serous-cyst-adenoma-of-the-pancreas-appraisal-of-active-surgical-strategy-before-it-causes-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Serous cyst adenoma of the pancreas: appraisal of active surgical strategy before it causes problems.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Hwang HK, Kim H, Kang CM, Lee WJ
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Serous cyst adenoma of the pancreas: appraisal of active surgical strategy before it causes problems.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Hwang HK, Kim H, Kang CM, Lee WJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Patients who are diagnosed with symptomatic or ambiguous serous cyst adenoma (SCA) need surgery. The purpose of this study is to suggest a potential management plan based on analysis of surgically treated SCAs.                                         METHODS:                       Between August 1995 and December 2010, 38 patients with SCA were surgically treated. Data were analyzed retrospectively.                                         RESULTS:                       Among 38 patients, 28 were female and ten were male. Mean age was 49.6 ± 14.1 years, and five patients (13.2%) were older than 65 years. Among the five patients, two were more than 70 years old. Seventeen patients (44.7%) were symptomatic, and the rest (21, 55.3%) were incidentally found to have SCA. Twenty-seven patients underwent open pancreatectomy, and 11 patients received laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Mean tumor size was 4.4 ± 2.8 cm. Most asymptomatic patients of SCA had a left-sided pancreatic tumor and distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy were frequently performed with short operative time and less blood transfusion (P &lt; 0.05). Minimally invasive surgery was mostly applied to left-sided tumors less than 5 cm in size (11/19 vs. 0/6, P = 0.029). Combined resection of the right colon was performed in two patients (5.3%) due to severe adhesion associated with large tumors. Significant association was noted between age and tumor size in asymptomatic patients (correlation coefficient = 0.541, R                         (2) = 0.293, P = 0.014). Postoperative pancreatic fistula was observed in five patients (13.2%, grade B) but could be managed conservatively. No mortality was found.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Before SCA causes symptoms or grows larger than 5 cm, an active surgical approach, such as minimally invasive surgery, needs to be considered.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179458 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/serous-cyst-adenoma-of-the-pancreas-appraisal-of-active-surgical-strategy-before-it-causes-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse and descending colon cancer: a single-center experience.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/clinical-outcomes-of-laparoscopic-surgery-for-advanced-transverse-and-descending-colon-cancer-a-single-center-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/clinical-outcomes-of-laparoscopic-surgery-for-advanced-transverse-and-descending-colon-cancer-a-single-center-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse and descending colon cancer: a single-center experience.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N, Uchiyama K
   ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse and descending colon cancer: a single-center experience.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N, Uchiyama K</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The role of laparoscopic surgery in management of transverse and descending colon cancer remains controversial. The aim of the present study is to investigate the short-term and oncologic long-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer.                                         METHODS:                       This cohort study analyzed 245 patients (stage II disease, n = 70; stage III disease, n = 63) who underwent resection of transverse and descending colon cancers, including 200 laparoscopic surgeries (LAC) and 45 conventional open surgeries (OC) from December 1996 to December 2010. Short-term and oncologic long-term outcomes were recorded.                                         RESULTS:                       The operative time was longer in the LAC group than in the OC group. However, intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower and postoperative recovery time was significantly shorter in the LAC group than in the OC group. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients with stage II were 84.9% and 84.9% in the OC group and 93.7% and 90.0% in the LAC group, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients with stage III disease were 63.4% and 54.6% in the OC group and 66.7% and 56.9% in the LAC group, respectively.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Use of laparoscopic surgery resulted in acceptable short-term and oncologic outcomes in patients with advanced transverse and descending colon cancer.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179459 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/clinical-outcomes-of-laparoscopic-surgery-for-advanced-transverse-and-descending-colon-cancer-a-single-center-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcomes-of-surgical-management-of-symptomatic-large-recurrent-hiatus-hernia/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcomes-of-surgical-management-of-symptomatic-large-recurrent-hiatus-hernia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Juhasz A, Sundaram A, Hoshino M, Lee TH, Mittal SK
        Abstract
        OBJECTIVE:                       Re...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Juhasz A, Sundaram A, Hoshino M, Lee TH, Mittal SK</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        OBJECTIVE:                       Recurrent hiatus hernia is frequently found in patients undergoing reoperative antireflux surgery. The objective of this study is to report perioperative complications and subjective and objective outcomes for patients who underwent reoperative intervention for symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia.                                         METHODS:                       Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients with large (≥5 cm gastric tissue above the crus) recurrent hiatus hernia who underwent reoperation after failed antireflux surgery. Data for preoperative workup, operative procedure, and postoperative 6-month follow-up were reviewed and analyzed.                                         RESULTS:                       Two hundred twenty patients underwent reoperation over a 6-year period. Forty-four patients had large recurrent hiatus hernia; 21 underwent redo fundoplication, while 23 underwent Roux-en-Y (RNY) reconstruction as remedial procedure. Short esophagus was found in 16 cases (6 of 21 redo Collis fundoplications, 10 of 23 RNY reconstructions). There was significant symptom improvement and high degree of satisfaction reported in both groups. However, patients with short esophagus did better with RNY reconstruction compared with redo Collis gastroplasty.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Repair of large recurrent hiatus hernia is a technically challenging procedure; however, there is high degree of symptom resolution and patient satisfaction. RNY reconstruction might be a better alternative in patients with short esophagus compared with redo Collis gastroplasty.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179460 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcomes-of-surgical-management-of-symptomatic-large-recurrent-hiatus-hernia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-for-esophageal-squamous-cell-carcinoma-a-case-control-study-of-thoracoscope-versus-mediastinoscope-assistance/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-for-esophageal-squamous-cell-carcinoma-a-case-control-study-of-thoracoscope-versus-mediastinoscope-assistance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Feng MX, Wang H, Zhang Y, Tan LJ, Xu ZL, Qun...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Feng MX, Wang H, Zhang Y, Tan LJ, Xu ZL, Qun W</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        OBJECTIVE:                       Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been widely applied for esophageal carcinoma treatment. Thoracoscope-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy (TATTE) and mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) are two kinds of MIE. The objective of this study is to compare these two methods with respect to surgical safety and survival.                                         METHODS:                       Single-institution experience with MATHE and TATTE was analyzed to assess morbidity, adequacy of tumor clearance, and survival. A pair-matched case-control study was performed to compare 54 patients who underwent either MATHE or TATTE between July 2000 and December 2009. Patients were matched by age, sex, comorbidity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), tumor location, and stage.                                         RESULTS:                       Statistically significant differences between the MATHE group and the TATTE group were: shorter operative time for MATHE (194.4 min) versus TATTE (228.1 min), less blood loss during operation in the TATTE group (142.6 ml) versus the MATHE group (214.6 ml), and more lymph nodes retrieved in the TATTE group (19.1 nodes) versus the MATHE group (11.4 nodes). There was no difference in survival between the groups.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       MATHE and TATTE are both technically feasible. TATTE can provide better visibility. TATTE has less blood loss compared with MATHE. More adequate tumor clearance in terms of lymph node dissection can be achieved with TATTE.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179461 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-for-esophageal-squamous-cell-carcinoma-a-case-control-study-of-thoracoscope-versus-mediastinoscope-assistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/clinical-risk-factors-for-perforation-during-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-large-sized-nonpedunculated-colorectal-tumors/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/clinical-risk-factors-for-perforation-during-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-large-sized-nonpedunculated-colorectal-tumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Lee EJ, Lee JB, Choi YS, Lee SH, Lee DH, Kim DS, Youk...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lee EJ, Lee JB, Choi YS, Lee SH, Lee DH, Kim DS, Youk EG</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The possible risk of colonic perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors is a barrier to wide application. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the risk and the predictive factors for perforation during ESD procedure.                                         METHODS:                       Between October 2006 and November 2010, a total of 499 consecutive patients (mean age 60.0 ± 11.3 years) who underwent ESD for large-sized (≥20 mm), nonpedunculated colorectal tumor were analyzed. First, incidence rate and clinical course of perforation were evaluated. Second, patient-related variables (age, sex, history of aspirin or antiplatelet agents, and comorbidity), endoscopic variables (tumor size, location, and type), procedure-related variables (experience of procedures, procedure time, and materials of submucosal injection), and pathologic diagnosis were analyzed.                                         RESULTS:                       The mean size of the lesions was 28.9 mm. The overall en bloc resection rate was 95.0%. Perforation occurred in 37 out of 499 patients (7.4%). Thirty-four patients could be successfully treated conservatively. The type (laterally spreading tumor) and the location (right-sided colon) of the tumors, less experience of the procedure (&lt;100 cases) in each endoscopist, and submucosal injection without hyaluronic acid were associated with higher frequency of perforation (all P &lt; 0.05). On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading type of tumor [odds ratio (OR) 4.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-14.34] and submucosal injection with hyaluronic acid (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.72) were independent predictive factors.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Perforation rate was 7.4%, and most cases could be successfully managed nonsurgically. In case of laterally spreading type of tumor, more caution is needed during submucosal dissection and long-lasting submucosal cushion is important for preventing perforation.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179462 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/clinical-risk-factors-for-perforation-during-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-large-sized-nonpedunculated-colorectal-tumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy in an unselected patient population.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-laparoscopic-right-colectomy-in-an-unselected-patient-population/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-laparoscopic-right-colectomy-in-an-unselected-patient-population/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy in an unselected patient population.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Boone BA, Wagner P, Ganchuk E, Evans L, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL, Holtzman MP
        Abstract
        BACKGROUN...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy in an unselected patient population.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Boone BA, Wagner P, Ganchuk E, Evans L, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL, Holtzman MP</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly utilized for colorectal surgery, with the most frequently reported single-incision laparoscopic operation being right hemicolectomy. While current data suggest that single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy is feasible, safe, and roughly equivalent to standard laparoscopic right colectomy, the technique has to date only been described in highly selected patients. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy has not yet been assessed in a standard patient population.                                         METHODS:                       A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate all single-incision right hemicolectomies performed by a single surgeon between May 2010 and April 2011. Demographic data, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were assessed.                                         RESULTS:                       Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy was performed in a series of 30 consecutive patients with indications for right colectomy. One patient required conversion to an open procedure for extensive adhesions, while no patients required additional port placement. Mean operative time was 107 min. All patients had negative margins and had an average of 20 lymph nodes harvested. Mean length of stay was 6 days. There were no intraoperative complications and no mortality in the study. The perioperative complication rate was 37%, with 71% of complications being grade 1.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy is feasible, safe, efficient, and oncologically sound for most patients who are seen in a typical colorectal practice. These data are useful as single-incision laparoscopic colectomy becomes more broadly implemented.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179463 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-laparoscopic-right-colectomy-in-an-unselected-patient-population/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extending the limitations of liver surgery: outcomes of initial human experience in a high-volume center performing single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/extending-the-limitations-of-liver-surgery-outcomes-of-initial-human-experience-in-a-high-volume-center-performing-single-port-laparoscopic-liver-resection-for-hepatocellular-carcinoma/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/extending-the-limitations-of-liver-surgery-outcomes-of-initial-human-experience-in-a-high-volume-center-performing-single-port-laparoscopic-liver-resection-for-hepatocellular-carcinoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Extending the limitations of liver surgery: outcomes of initial human experience in a high-volume center performing single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Sh...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Extending the limitations of liver surgery: outcomes of initial human experience in a high-volume center performing single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Shetty GS, You YK, Choi HJ, Na GH, Hong TH, Kim DG</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Single-port laparoscopic surgery is slowly but steadily gaining popularity among surgeons performing minimally invasive abdominal surgeries. The aim of the present study is to assess our initial experience with single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.                                         METHODS:                       Between March 2009 and April 2011, 24 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Of these, 13 were laparoscopic segmentectomies, 4 were laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies, 1 was a right hepatectomy, 1 was a left hepatectomy, and 4 were nonanatomical resections.                                         RESULTS:                       Median operating time and blood loss were 205 min (95-545 min) and 500 ml (100-2,500 ml), respectively. Two procedures were converted to multiport laparoscopic hepatectomy due to instrument length limitations, and four were converted to open surgery. There were no serious intraoperative or postoperative complications in this series. Median postoperative stay was 8.5 days (5-16 days).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Although the procedure requires a lot of technical expertise added to the skill of liver surgery, single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma seems a feasible approach in a variety of well-selected cases. In spite of the demanding nature of the procedure and the requirement of better instrumentation for single-port laparoscopic surgery, the results seem to compare favorably with conventional laparoscopic surgery and open surgery.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179464 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/extending-the-limitations-of-liver-surgery-outcomes-of-initial-human-experience-in-a-high-volume-center-performing-single-port-laparoscopic-liver-resection-for-hepatocellular-carcinoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy: a new surgical option for pancreatic disease.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/retroperitoneoscopic-pancreatectomy-a-new-surgical-option-for-pancreatic-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/retroperitoneoscopic-pancreatectomy-a-new-surgical-option-for-pancreatic-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy: a new surgical option for pancreatic disease.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Zhao G, Xue R, Ma X, Hu M, Gu X, Wang B, Zhang X, Liu R
        Abstract
        OBJECTIVE:               ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy: a new surgical option for pancreatic disease.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Zhao G, Xue R, Ma X, Hu M, Gu X, Wang B, Zhang X, Liu R</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        OBJECTIVE:                       The advantage of retroperitoneoscopy in renal and adrenal gland surgery has been widely acknowledged. Retroperitoneoscopy may also be a useful approach to the pancreas, a retroperitoneal organ. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy performed in an animal model and a small patient cohort.                                         METHODS:                       This study was divided into two stages. Initially, retroperitoneoscopic distal pancreatectomy was performed in 6-month-old Yorkshire breed piglets (n = 5; mean weight, 50 ± 5 kg). Subsequently, seven patients with suspected diagnosis of distal pancreatic lesions were selected between February 2010 and April 2011 to undergo retroperitoneoscopy. Approval was obtained from both the Animal Ethics Committee and the Institutional Review Board.                                         RESULTS:                       In the animal models, retroperitoneoscopic procedures were accomplished smoothly with short operative time, insignificant blood loss, and only minor complications. In clinical practice, patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic diseases underwent enucleation (n = 2) or distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation (n = 2). Operative times ranged from 30 to 100 min with controllable blood loss of 10-100 ml. One case of intraoperative retroperitoneal perforation and two cases of pancreatic fistula occurred. All four patients were discharged within 7 days postoperatively. The other three patients with nonpancreatic diseases underwent retroperitoneoscopic resection with excellent clinical outcome.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The results of this preliminary study demonstrate that retroperitoneoscopic pancreatectomy, a novel surgical approach, was feasible and effective in selected patients. The advantages of this approach include acceptable operating time, insignificant blood loss, simple manipulations, minor complications, and excellent postoperative recovery time. Additionally, this study suggests that retroperitoneoscopy could also be feasible for treatment of retroperitoneal nonpancreatic diseases.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179465 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/retroperitoneoscopic-pancreatectomy-a-new-surgical-option-for-pancreatic-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effect of local anesthetics on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/effect-of-local-anesthetics-on-postoperative-pain-and-opioid-consumption-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/effect-of-local-anesthetics-on-postoperative-pain-and-opioid-consumption-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Effect of local anesthetics on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Stuhldreher JM, Adamina M, Konopacka A, Brady K, Delaney CP
        Abstract
   ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effect of local anesthetics on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Stuhldreher JM, Adamina M, Konopacka A, Brady K, Delaney CP</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Several studies have evaluated use of local anesthetic, specifically, administration of intraperitoneal anesthetic, during laparoscopic general surgery and gynecologic operations, with varying results. There have been no studies to determine the role of local anesthetic in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This study evaluates the efficacy of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthetic in reducing postoperative pain following common laparoscopic colorectal procedures, in patients managed with enhanced recovery care pathways.                                         METHODS:                       A single-institution retrospective cohort analysis of 172 patients who underwent common elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures was carried out. Over three consecutive time periods, patients were divided into three study arms, based on administration of local anesthetic. The first group received no local anesthetic (n = 66), the next received only subcutaneous bupivacaine (n = 67), and the final group received both subcutaneous bupivacaine and intraperitoneal lidocaine (n = 44). Pain scores, time in the postoperative care unit, and the amount of opioid pain medication consumed in the immediate postoperative period were quantified.                                         RESULTS:                       There was no difference in pain scores reported between the three study arms, including upon arrival and upon leaving the recovery unit (P ≤ 0.086, P ≤ 0.166), and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 h postoperatively (P ≤ 0.332, P ≤ 0.142, P ≤ 0.155, P ≤ 0.872). There was no significant difference in the amount of postoperative opioid analgesia consumed between the three study arms on postoperative day 0 and on postoperative day 1 (P ≤ 0.365, P ≤ 0.458). There were no significant differences in the amount of time spent in the postoperative care unit, hospital stay, 30 day morbidity, or 30 day mortality between the three study arms.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Use of local anesthetic does not influence postoperative opioid requirements or patients&#8217; subjective report of pain following laparoscopic colorectal procedures managed within enhanced recovery care pathways.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179466 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/effect-of-local-anesthetics-on-postoperative-pain-and-opioid-consumption-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reliable and valid assessment of performance in thoracoscopy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/reliable-and-valid-assessment-of-performance-in-thoracoscopy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/reliable-and-valid-assessment-of-performance-in-thoracoscopy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Reliable and valid assessment of performance in thoracoscopy.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Konge L, Lehnert P, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Ringsted C
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                       As we move to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Reliable and valid assessment of performance in thoracoscopy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Konge L, Lehnert P, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Ringsted C</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       As we move toward competency-based education in medicine, we have lagged in developing competency-based evaluation methods. In the era of minimally invasive surgery, there is a need for a reliable and valid tool dedicated to measure competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study is to create such an assessment tool, and to explore its reliability and validity.                                         METHODS:                       An expert group of physicians created an assessment tool consisting of 10 items rated on a five-point rating scale. The following factors were included: economy and confidence of movement, respect for tissue, precision of operative technique, creation and placement of ports, localization of pathologic tissue, use of staplers, retrieval of tissue in bag and placement of chest tube. Fifty consecutive thoracoscopic wedge resections were recorded and assessed blindly and independently by two experts using the tool.                                         RESULTS:                       Four residents, four fellows and five consultants performed 1-10 (median 4) operations each. The fellows performed significantly better than the residents (P = 0.03; effect size, ES = 0.72). The consultants scored 11% higher than the fellows, but this difference was not significant (P = 0.10, ES = 0.64). The inter-rater reliability was acceptable (Cronbach&#8217;s alpha 0.71).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       This tool for assessing performance in thoracoscopy is reliable and valid. It can provide unbiased feedback to trainees, and can be used to evaluate new teaching curricula, i.e. simulation-based training. Furthermore, it has potential to aid in certification of new thoracic surgeons.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179467 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/reliable-and-valid-assessment-of-performance-in-thoracoscopy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/transgastric-pure-notes-peritoneoscopy-and-endoscopic-ultrasonography-for-staging-of-gastrointestinal-cancers-a-survival-and-feasibility-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/transgastric-pure-notes-peritoneoscopy-and-endoscopic-ultrasonography-for-staging-of-gastrointestinal-cancers-a-survival-and-feasibility-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Donatsky AM, Vilmann P, Meisner S, Jørgense...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Donatsky AM, Vilmann P, Meisner S, Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Human natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has mainly been based on simultaneous laparoscopic assistance (hybrid NOTES), forgoing the theoretical benefits of the NOTES technique. This is due to a lack of NOTES-specific instruments and endoscopes, making pure-NOTES procedures difficult and time consuming. An area where pure NOTES could be adopted at its present stage of development is minimally invasive staging of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of combining transgastric (TG) pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography (ip-EUS) with intraluminal EUS (il-EUS) for peritoneal evaluation.                                         METHODS:                       This was a feasibility and survival study where il-EUS followed by ip-EUS and peritoneoscopy was performed in 10 pigs subjected to TG pure NOTES. A score was given with regard to achieved visualisation of predefined anatomical structures. Survival was assessed at postoperative day (POD) 14.                                         RESULTS:                       All animals survived until POD 14. Median total procedural time was 94 min (range 74-130 min). Median time for il-EUS, ip-EUS and peritoneoscopy was 11 min (range 7-14 min), 13 min (range 8-20 min) and 10 min (range 6-23 min). Il-EUS, ip-EUS and peritoneoscopy resulted in a score of 15/15 points (range 14-15 points), 6/9 points (range 1-8 points) and 12/13 points (range 8-13 points).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       TG pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and ip-EUS combined with il-EUS is feasible and provides sufficient peritoneal evaluation. The technique could have potential for minimally invasive staging of GI cancers.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179468 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/transgastric-pure-notes-peritoneoscopy-and-endoscopic-ultrasonography-for-staging-of-gastrointestinal-cancers-a-survival-and-feasibility-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-with-and-without-gastric-ischemic-conditioning/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-with-and-without-gastric-ischemic-conditioning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Reavis KM, Elliott C, Masoomi H, Stamos MJ
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Reavis KM, Elliott C, Masoomi H, Stamos MJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Esophagectomy can be associated with significant morbidity such as leaks and strictures. Preoperative gastric ischemic conditioning is a concept aimed at inducing an ischemic insult to the gastric fundus and cardia prior to esophagectomy, thus leading to improvement of gastric perfusion.                                         METHODS:                       This retrospective study compared outcome data from 81 patients who underwent esophagectomy after laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning with that from 71 patients who underwent esophagectomy without conditioning. Gastric ischemic conditioning consisted of laparoscopic division of the left gastric vessels ± the short gastric vessels. The time interval from gastric ischemic conditioning to esophagectomy ranged from 2 to 75 days. Main outcome measures included demographics, mean time interval between staging and esophagectomy, and the rate of leaks and strictures following esophagectomy.                                         RESULTS:                       The two groups were comparable with respect to gender and age. In the gastric ischemic conditioning procedures, there were no conversions; the mean operative time was 57 ± 15 min, the mean length of hospital stay was 1.0 ± 1.1 days, and the rate of postoperative complications was 3.7%. The mean time interval between gastric ischemic conditioning and esophagectomy was 6.0 ± 5.4 days. There were no significant differences in the leak rate (11.1% for conditioning vs. 8.5% without conditioning) or stricture rate (29.6% for conditioning vs. 25.3% without conditioning) between the two groups.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning is feasible and safe. However, the use of gastric ischemic conditioning in this study did not alter the clinical rate of postoperative leaks and strictures.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179469 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-esophagectomy-with-and-without-gastric-ischemic-conditioning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/sleeve-gastrectomy-and-the-risk-of-leak-a-systematic-analysis-of-4888-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/sleeve-gastrectomy-and-the-risk-of-leak-a-systematic-analysis-of-4888-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA
        Abstract
        INTRODUCTION:                       Sleeve gastrect...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION:                       Sleeve gastrectomy has become a popular stand-alone bariatric procedure with comparable weight loss and resolution of comorbidities to that of laparoscopic gastric bypass. The simplicity of the procedure and the decreased long-term risk profile make this surgery more appealing. Nonetheless, the ever present risk of a staple-line leak is still of great concern and needs further investigation.                                         METHODS:                       An electronic literature search of MEDLINE database plus manual reference checks of articles published on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity and its complications was completed. Keywords used in the search were &#8220;sleeve gastrectomy&#8221; OR &#8220;gastric sleeve&#8221; AND &#8220;leak.&#8221; We analyzed 29 publications, including 4,888 patients. We analyzed the frequency of leak after sleeve gastrectomy and its associated risks of causation.                                         RESULTS:                       The risk of leak after sleeve gastrectomy in all comers was 2.4%. This risk was 2.9% in the super-obese [body mass index (BMI) &gt; 50 kg/m(2)] and 2.2% for BMI &lt; 50 kg/m(2). Staple height and use of buttressing material did not affect leak rate. The use of a size 40-Fr or greater bougie was associated with a leak rate of 0.6% compared with those who used smaller sizes whose leak rate was 2.8%. Leaks were found at the proximal third of the stomach in 89% of cases. Most leaks were diagnosed after discharge. Endoscopic management is a viable option for leaks and was documented in 11% of cases as successful.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Sleeve gastrectomy has become an important surgical option for the treatment of the ever growing morbidly obese population. The risk of leak is low at 2.4%. Attention to detail specifically at the esophagogastric junction cannot be stressed enough. Careful patient selection (BMI &lt; 50 kg/m(2)) and adopting the use of a 40-Fr or larger bougie may decrease the risk of leak. Vigilant follow-up during the first 30 days is critical to avoid catastrophe, because most leaks will happen after patient discharge.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179470 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/sleeve-gastrectomy-and-the-risk-of-leak-a-systematic-analysis-of-4888-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The influence of the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on a rat model of intestinal anastomosis healing.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-influence-of-the-co2-pneumoperitoneum-on-a-rat-model-of-intestinal-anastomosis-healing/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-influence-of-the-co2-pneumoperitoneum-on-a-rat-model-of-intestinal-anastomosis-healing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The influence of the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on a rat model of intestinal anastomosis healing.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Tytgat SH, Rijkers GT, van der Zee DC
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:                     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The influence of the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on a rat model of intestinal anastomosis healing.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Tytgat SH, Rijkers GT, van der Zee DC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, which is used for laparoscopic surgery, causes local and systemic effects in patients. Concern arises about what the pressurized anoxic environment of the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum has on intestinal healing. Earlier experimental work showed a negative correlation between intestinal healing and the applied intra-abdominal pressure. To further elucidate this, we developed a rat model, in which enterotomy healing can be compared after open or laparoscopic surgery. Possible mechanisms of injury, such as impaired neoangiogenesis or injury through hypoxia-induced pathways were studied.                                         METHODS:                       A new experimental mechanically ventilated rat model was developed. An enterotomy was made and closed via laparotomy (group I) or laparoscopy under CO(2) pressures of 5 mmHg (group II) or 10 mmHg (group III). Intestinal healing was tested in vivo after 1 week by bursting-pressure analysis. The effect of the operative procedure on neoangiogenesis was tested by counting factor VIII positive vessels in biopsies of the perianastomotic granulation tissue after 1 week. Intestinal anoxia was tested by quantifying HIF-1α protein levels in intestinal biopsies, taken before the enterotomy closure.                                         RESULTS:                       The bursting pressures were significantly lower after laparoscopic surgery at 10 mmHg CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (group III) compared with rats that had undergone open surgery (group I) or laparoscopic surgery at 5 mmHg CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (group II). There was no significant quantitative difference between the three groups in the neoangiogenesis nor was there a difference in the amount of HIF-1α measured in the intestinal biopsies.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       We developed a surgical model that is well fitted to study the effects of pneumoperitoneum on intestinal healing. With this model, we found further evidence of CO(2) pressure-dependant hampered intestinal healing. These differences could not be explained by difference in neoangiogenesis nor local upregulation of hypoxic factors.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179471 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-influence-of-the-co2-pneumoperitoneum-on-a-rat-model-of-intestinal-anastomosis-healing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-site-robotic-cholecystectomy-ssrc-versus-single-incision-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-silc-comparison-of-learning-curves-first-european-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-site-robotic-cholecystectomy-ssrc-versus-single-incision-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-silc-comparison-of-learning-curves-first-european-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Magli...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging procedure developed to decrease parietal trauma and improve cosmetic results. However, many technical constraints, such as lack of triangulation, instrument collisions, and cross-handing, hamper this approach. Using a robotic platform may overcome these problems and enable more precise surgical actions by increasing freedom of movement and by restoring intuitive instrument control.                                         METHODS:                       We retrospectively collected, under institutional review board approval, data on the first 25 patients who underwent single-site robotic cholecystectomies (SSRC) at our center. Patients enrolled in this study underwent SSRC for symptomatic biliary gallstones or polyposis. Exclusion criteria were: BMI &gt; 33; acute cholecystitis; previous upper abdominal surgery; ASA &gt; II; and age &gt;80 and &lt;18 years. All procedures were performed with the da Vinci Si Surgical System(®) and a dedicated SSRC kit (Intuitive(©)). After discharge, patients were followed for 2 months. These SSRC cases were compared to our first 25 single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SILC) and with the literature.                                         RESULTS:                       There were no differences in patient characteristics between groups (gender, P = 0.4404; age, P = 0.7423; BMI, P = 0.5699), and there were no conversions or major complications in either cohort. Operative time was significantly longer for the SILC group compared with SSRC (83.2 vs. 62.7 min, P = 0.0006), and SSRC operative times did not change significantly along the series. The majority of patients in each group were discharged within 24 h, with an average length of hospital stay of 1.2 days for the SILC group and 1.1 days for the SSRC group (P = 0.2854). No wound complications (infection, incisional hernia) were observed in the SSRC group and in the SILC.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Our preliminary experience shows that SSRC is safe, can easily be learned, and performed in a reproducible manner and is faster than SILC.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179472 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-site-robotic-cholecystectomy-ssrc-versus-single-incision-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-silc-comparison-of-learning-curves-first-european-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/evaluation-of-2590-urological-laparoscopic-surgeries-undertaken-by-urological-surgeons-accredited-by-an-endoscopic-surgical-skill-qualification-system-in-urological-laparoscopy-in-japan/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/evaluation-of-2590-urological-laparoscopic-surgeries-undertaken-by-urological-surgeons-accredited-by-an-endoscopic-surgical-skill-qualification-system-in-urological-laparoscopy-in-japan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  H...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Habuchi T, Terachi T, Mimata H, Kondo Y, Kanayama H, Ichikawa T, Nutahara K, Miki T, Ono Y, Baba S, Naito S, Matsuda T</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       In 2003, the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) and Japanese Society of Endourology (JSE) established a urological laparoscopic skill qualification system, called the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in Urological Laparoscopy of JUA and JSE (ESSQSJJ). The main goal of the system is to decrease the prevalence of complications associated with laparoscopic surgery. To validate the qualification system, perioperative outcome and the prevalence of complications in different types of urological laparoscopic surgery performed by accredited surgeons were evaluated.                                         METHODS:                       One hundred thirty-six surgeons who obtained the qualification in 2004 were prospectively asked to submit intraoperative and postoperative data of their latest 20 cases at the end of 2009, along with the number of laparoscopic urological surgeries performed in each year for a 5-year period (2004-2009). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to the Satava classification and modified Clavien classification, respectively.                                         RESULTS:                       Data of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries of 130 surgeons, including 904 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies, 430 laparoscopic nephroureterectomies, 390 laparoscopic adrenalectomies, 320 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, and 170 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies, were analyzed. Complications were noted in 97 (3.7%) patients. Major intraoperative complications (grade II or III) occurred in 32 (1.2%) patients, and major postoperative complications (grade III or higher) occurred in 24 (0.9%) patients. The prevalence of conversion to open surgery, allogeneic transfusion, and perioperative mortality was 2.5%, 1.6%, and 0%, respectively. The number of surgeries performed by each qualified surgeon or the role of the surgeon (main operator vs. mentor/instructor) in the surgery did not affect the prevalence of intraoperative complications or postoperative complications. The open conversion rate was significantly higher in surgeons with a low surgical volume.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       ESSQSJJ can ensure urological laparoscopic surgeons who can perform various types of urological laparoscopic surgeries with a low prevalence of perioperative complications and reasonable outcomes.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179473 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/evaluation-of-2590-urological-laparoscopic-surgeries-undertaken-by-urological-surgeons-accredited-by-an-endoscopic-surgical-skill-qualification-system-in-urological-laparoscopy-in-japan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fully covered removable nitinol self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in malignant strictures of the esophagus: a multicenter analysis.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/fully-covered-removable-nitinol-self-expandable-metal-stents-sems-in-malignant-strictures-of-the-esophagus-a-multicenter-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/fully-covered-removable-nitinol-self-expandable-metal-stents-sems-in-malignant-strictures-of-the-esophagus-a-multicenter-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Fully covered removable nitinol self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in malignant strictures of the esophagus: a multicenter analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Talreja JP, Eloubeidi MA, Sauer BG, Al-Awabdy BS, Lopes...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Fully covered removable nitinol self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in malignant strictures of the esophagus: a multicenter analysis.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Talreja JP, Eloubeidi MA, Sauer BG, Al-Awabdy BS, Lopes T, Kahaleh M, Shami VM</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Fully covered esophageal self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) often are used for palliation of malignant dysphagia. However, experience and data on these stents are still limited. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fully covered nitinol SEMS in patients with malignant dysphagia.                                         METHODS:                       37 patients underwent placement of a SEMS during a 3 year period. Five patients underwent SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery: one for tracheoesophageal fistula in the setting of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, one for perforation in setting of esophageal adenocarcinoma, 27 for unresectable esophageal cancer (16 adenocarcinoma, 11 squamous cell carcinoma), two for lung cancer, and one for breast-cancer-related esophageal strictures.                                         RESULTS:                       SEMS placement was successful in all 37 patients. Immediate complications after stent deployment included chest pain (n = 6), severe heartburn (n = 1), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding requiring SEMS revision (n = 1). Dysphagia scores improved significantly from 3.2 ± 0.4 before stent placement to 1.4 ± 1.0 at 1 month (P &lt; 0.0001), 1.1 ± 1.2 (P &lt; 0.0001) at 3 months, and 1.3 ± 1.4 (P = 0.0018) at 6 months. The stent was removed in 11 patients (30%) for the following indications: resolution of stricture (n = 3), stent malfunction (n = 5), and stent migration (n = 3). After stent removal, three patients were restented, three underwent dilation, and two underwent PEG placement. Mean survival for the 37 patients after stent placement was 146.3 ± 143.6 (range, 13-680) days.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Our study suggests that fully covered SEMS placement improve dysphagia scores in patients with malignant strictures, particularly in the unresectable population. Further technical improvements in design to minimize long-term malfunction and migration are required.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179474 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/fully-covered-removable-nitinol-self-expandable-metal-stents-sems-in-malignant-strictures-of-the-esophagus-a-multicenter-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-open-distal-pancreatectomy-a-clinical-and-cost-effectiveness-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-open-distal-pancreatectomy-a-clinical-and-cost-effectiveness-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is being increasingly performed with some concerns regarding the cost of the minimally invasive approach. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of LDP versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).                                         METHODS:                       A retrospective clinical and cost-comparison analysis was performed for patients who underwent LDP vs. OPD between 2005 and 2011. Data considered for the comparison analysis were: operative costs (surgical procedure, operative time, blood transfusions), postoperative costs (laboratory testing, hospital stay, complication management, readmissions), and overall costs.                                         RESULTS:                       Fifty-one distal pancreatectomies (laparoscopic = 35, open = 16) were performed during the study period. The median operative time was 200 (range, 120-420) min for LDP vs. 225 (range, 120-460) min for ODP (p = 0.93). Median blood loss was 200 (range, 50-900) mL for LDP vs. 394 (range, 75-2000) mL for ODP (p = 0.038). Median hospital stay was 7 (range, 3-25) days in the laparoscopic group vs. 11 (range, 5-46) days in the open group (p = 0.007). Complication rate was 40% for LDP vs. 69% in ODP (p = 0.075). Postoperative intervention was required in 11% of patients after LDP vs. 31% after ODP (p = 0.12). The average operative, postoperative, and overall cost was £6039 (range, £4276-£9500), £4547 (range, £1299-£13937), £10587 (range, £6508-£20303) vs. £5231 (range, £3409-£9330), £10094 (range, £2665-£39291), £15324 (range, £7209-£47484) for the LDP and ODP groups, respectively (p = 0.033; p = 0.006; p = 0.197).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       We showed that LDP is feasible and safe without having a negative impact on cost. Extensive experience in pancreatic and laparoscopic surgery is required to optimize surgical outcomes.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179475 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-open-distal-pancreatectomy-a-clinical-and-cost-effectiveness-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/conventional-versus-robot-assisted-laparoscopic-nissen-fundoplication-a-comparison-of-postoperative-acid-reflux-parameters/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/conventional-versus-robot-assisted-laparoscopic-nissen-fundoplication-a-comparison-of-postoperative-acid-reflux-parameters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R, Colli G, Melotti G
        Abstract
  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R, Colli G, Melotti G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is a technically demanding surgical procedure designed to cure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It represents an alternative to life-long medical therapy and the only recommended treatment modality to overcome refractoriness to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The recent development of robotic systems prompted evaluation of their use in antireflux surgery. Between 1997 and 2000, in a PPI-responsive series we found postoperative normalization of esophageal acid exposure time (EAET) in most but not all cases. Between 2007 and 2009, in a PPI-refractory series we found postoperative normalization of EAET in all cases. We decided to analyze retrospectively our prospectively collected data to evaluate whether differences other than the conventional or robot-assisted technique could justify postoperative differences in acid reflux parameters.                                         METHODS:                       Baseline demographic, endoscopic, and manometric parameters were compared between the two series of patients, as well as postoperative manometric and acid reflux parameters.                                         RESULTS:                       There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic, endoscopic, and manometric characteristics between the two groups of patients. The median lower esophageal sphincter tone increased significantly, and the median EAET decreased significantly after conventional as well as after robot-assisted LNF. The median postoperative EAET was significantly lower in the robot-assisted (0.2%) than in the conventional LNF group (1%; P = 0.001). Abnormal EAET values were found in 6 of 44 (14%) and in 0 of 44 cases after conventional and robot-assisted LNF, respectively (P = 0.026).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Robot-assisted LNF provided a significant gain in postoperative acid reflux parameters compared with the conventional technique. In a challenging clinical setting, such as PPI-refractoriness, in which the efficacy of endoscopic or pharmacological treatment modalities is only moderate, even a small therapeutic gain can be clinically relevant. In centers where robot-assisted LNF is available, it should be preferred to conventional LNF in PPI-refractory GERD.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179476 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/conventional-versus-robot-assisted-laparoscopic-nissen-fundoplication-a-comparison-of-postoperative-acid-reflux-parameters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis: a new step in the treatment of slow-transit constipation.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-subtotal-colectomy-with-antiperistaltic-cecorectal-anastomosis-a-new-step-in-the-treatment-of-slow-transit-constipation/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-subtotal-colectomy-with-antiperistaltic-cecorectal-anastomosis-a-new-step-in-the-treatment-of-slow-transit-constipation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis: a new step in the treatment of slow-transit constipation.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Marchesi F, Percalli L, Pinna F, Cecchini S, Ricco' M,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis: a new step in the treatment of slow-transit constipation.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Marchesi F, Percalli L, Pinna F, Cecchini S, Ricco&#8217; M, Roncoroni L</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (SCCRA) has proved to be an effective alternative to total colectomy for the treatment of severe slow-transit constipation. The laparoscopic approach has made this procedure even more attractive. This is the first controlled trial on laparoscopic SCCRA. The study compares the laparoscopic and the open approach.                                         METHODS:                       Since 2001, all SCCRAs have been performed laparoscopically at our institution. Only severely symptomatic patients are offered surgery, after stringent patient selection. Laparoscopic SCCRA was performed following the same steps that we first described for the open approach, by utilizing a five-trocar technique. Outcome parameters were prospectively collected every 3 and 6 months. Wexner constipation and incontinence scales (WCS, WI) and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) were adopted for functional results. We conducted a case-control study of 15 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic SCCRA (VL) and 15 patients previously operated on by the open approach (Op) to compare postoperative and functional outcomes.                                         RESULTS:                       The VL group had better postoperative outcomes (pain, ileus) while complication rates were similar. Resolution of constipation was impressive in both groups, with no significant difference at follow-up. The VL group presented with a higher number of bowel movements at 3 months (3.8 vs. 2.8, p = 0.039), resulting in a significantly higher incontinence rate at 3 months (WI 6.4 vs. 2.73, p = 0.004), although the difference was no longer significant at 1-year follow-up. The quality of life was good for both groups; the VL group showed a significant improvement at 1-year follow-up (64.18 vs. 114.79, p &lt; 0.01).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       Laparoscopic SCCRA confirmed the good functional results of the open approach, with no increase in morbidity rate and a faster postoperative recovery. An early higher incontinence rate did not affect quality of life.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179477 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-subtotal-colectomy-with-antiperistaltic-cecorectal-anastomosis-a-new-step-in-the-treatment-of-slow-transit-constipation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bare dorsal thoracic fascial flap for esophageal defects: an experimental study with dogs.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/bare-dorsal-thoracic-fascial-flap-for-esophageal-defects-an-experimental-study-with-dogs/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/bare-dorsal-thoracic-fascial-flap-for-esophageal-defects-an-experimental-study-with-dogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Bare dorsal thoracic fascial flap for esophageal defects: an experimental study with dogs.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;
        Authors:  Ugurlu K, Karsidag T, Huthut I, Karsidag S, Ozer K, Sacak B, Akcal A
        Abstract
        BACK...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Bare dorsal thoracic fascial flap for esophageal defects: an experimental study with dogs.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 17;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ugurlu K, Karsidag T, Huthut I, Karsidag S, Ozer K, Sacak B, Akcal A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Reconstruction of esophageal defects has challenged reconstructive surgeons for a long time. Problems that affect the continuity of the orogastic tract influence the patient&#8217;s quality of life and general health. Bare free fascial flaps are used to restore soft tissue defects of the oral cavity because they provide thin, pliable tissues with a high capacity for epithelialization to preserve the local anatomy. An experimental study was planned to investigate reconstruction of anterior cervical esophageal defects using a pedicled dorsal thoracic fascial flap.                                         METHODS:                       Eight hybrid dogs were used in the study. All operations were planned in three steps and performed with the animals under general anesthesia. For the two-layered reconstruction, the bare dorsal thoracic fascial flap was harvested and adapted like a patch to the defect.                                         RESULTS:                       No partial or total flap loss was observed. On postoperative day 20 surgery, a complete epithelial lining on the same plane as the esophageal mucosa was observed over the flap tissue. A 4- to 5-mm longitudinal scar that did not form even a minimal stricture in any dog also was observed. No significant changes from postoperative day 20 to postoperative days 40 and 60 were observed.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Bare fascial flaps in the oral cavity heal with spontaneous epithelialization and with no need for skin and mucosal grafts. Fascial flaps are easy to harvest and do not cause any functional loss because they are nonfunctional units. Their thin constitution helps the surgeon to shape the tissue and even form tubed flaps.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179478 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/bare-dorsal-thoracic-fascial-flap-for-esophageal-defects-an-experimental-study-with-dogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy: technique, safety, and feasibility in a clinical case series.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-port-laparoscopic-hepatectomy-technique-safety-and-feasibility-in-a-clinical-case-series/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-port-laparoscopic-hepatectomy-technique-safety-and-feasibility-in-a-clinical-case-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy: technique, safety, and feasibility in a clinical case series.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 18;
        Authors:  Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Ueno Y, Yamaguchi S, Koyama I
   ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy: technique, safety, and feasibility in a clinical case series.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 18;</p>
<p>Authors:  Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Ueno Y, Yamaguchi S, Koyama I</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The recent use of single-port-access surgery in cholecystectomy and other abdominal surgeries has confirmed its safety and validity as a treatment option. However, few reports have described the use of complete single-port access surgeries in hepatectomy for neoplasms.                                         METHODS:                       The authors performed single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy (SLH) for eight patients (5 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 patient with metastatic liver tumor, 1 patient with endocrine liver tumor, and 1 patient with hemangioma). Furthermore, in terms of Child-Pugh classification, five patients were in category A, two in category B, and one in category C. The patients were eligible for SLH if they had solitary tumors measuring 3 cm or smaller on the caudal surface of the liver. The lesion was approached through a 20-mm supraumbilical incision using a single-port access device.                                         RESULTS:                       No patient experienced intraoperative complications that required additional port access and conversion to laparotomy. The operative time was 148 min (range, 141-235 min). The postoperative course of the patients was uneventful, and they were discharged an average of 6.2 days (range, 3-11 days) after the operation. Approximately 2 weeks after discharge, the patients experienced no wound pain or liver dysfunction.                                         CONCLUSION:                       The SLH technique is a safe and feasible procedure for a specific group of candidates, including patients with high-grade liver dysfunction.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179479 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-port-laparoscopic-hepatectomy-technique-safety-and-feasibility-in-a-clinical-case-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic fistula or pancreatic duct dilation after pancreatic surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-ultrasound-guided-transmural-drainage-for-pancreatic-fistula-or-pancreatic-duct-dilation-after-pancreatic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-ultrasound-guided-transmural-drainage-for-pancreatic-fistula-or-pancreatic-duct-dilation-after-pancreatic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic fistula or pancreatic duct dilation after pancreatic surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 18;
        Authors:  Onodera M, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Kudo T, Haba S, Abe Y, Kawah...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic fistula or pancreatic duct dilation after pancreatic surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 18;</p>
<p>Authors:  Onodera M, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Kudo T, Haba S, Abe Y, Kawahata S, Eto K, Nasu Y, Tanaka E, Hirano S, Asaka M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is widely used to manage pancreatic pseudocysts. Several studies have reported the use of EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fistula and stasis of pancreatic juice caused by stricture of the pancreatic duct after pancreatic resection.                                         METHODS:                       At the authors&#8217; hospital, 262 patients underwent surgery involving pancreatic resection from April 2005 to March 2010. In 90 of these patients (34%), a grade B or C postoperative pancreatic fistula developed that required additional treatment. The authors performed EUS-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) for six patients (2.1%) with a pancreatic fistula or dilation of the main pancreatic duct visible by EUS. Percutaneous drainage was provided for 18 patients (6.8%). The success rates for EUS-TD and percutaneous drainage were compared in a retrospective analysis.                                         RESULTS:                       In all six cases, EUS-TD was performed successfully without complications. Five of the six patients were successfully treated with only one trial of EUS-TD. The final technical success rate was 100% for both EUS-TD and percutaneous drainage. Both the short- and long-term clinical success rates for EUS-TD were 100% and those for percutaneous drainage were 61.1 and 83%, respectively. The differences in these rates were not significant (short-term success, P = 0.091 vs. long-term success, P = 0.403). However, the time to clinical success was significantly shorter with EUS-TD (5.8 days) than with percutaneous drainage (30.4 days; P = 0.0013) in the current series.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The EUS-TD approach appears to be a safe and technically feasible alternative to percutaneous drainage and may be considered as first-line therapy for pancreatic fistulas visible by EUS.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22179480 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-ultrasound-guided-transmural-drainage-for-pancreatic-fistula-or-pancreatic-duct-dilation-after-pancreatic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisionary bariatric surgery: indications and outcome of 100 consecutive operations at a single center.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/revisionary-bariatric-surgery-indications-and-outcome-of-100-consecutive-operations-at-a-single-center/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/revisionary-bariatric-surgery-indications-and-outcome-of-100-consecutive-operations-at-a-single-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Revisionary bariatric surgery: indications and outcome of 100 consecutive operations at a single center.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 22;
        Authors:  Kuesters S, Grueneberger JM, Baumann T, Bukhari W, Daoud M, Hopt UT, Karcz WK
      ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Revisionary bariatric surgery: indications and outcome of 100 consecutive operations at a single center.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kuesters S, Grueneberger JM, Baumann T, Bukhari W, Daoud M, Hopt UT, Karcz WK</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       A growing number of revisionary and secondary bariatric operations have been performed in recent years, with the number of operations doubling each year at the authors&#8217; center. Diagnostics, indications, and most revisionary operations should be performed by an experienced bariatric surgeon. This study was undertaken to evaluate indications and outcomes of revisionary bariatric operations at a specialized center.                                         METHODS:                       At the Centre of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery (University of Freiburg, Germany), 100 consecutive revisionary bariatric operations performed between March 2007 and September 2009 were analyzed concerning indications and outcomes.                                         RESULTS:                       Only 9 of the 100 revisions were due to early complications (&lt;30 days after the primary operation). The indication for most revisions was poor weight loss (n = 55). A mean body mass index reduction of 10 points could be achieved in 1 year, which equals a 56% excess weight loss (EWL). No significant difference in weight reduction between restrictive and malabsorptive revisions was observed. Revisions due to implant-related problems also were frequent (n = 25). Laparoscopic revision was possible in 95% of the cases.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Insufficient weight loss is the most frequent indication for revisionary bariatric surgery. The surgery can be performed laparoscopically in most cases, and a significant EWL (&gt; 50%) can be achieved in 1 year if the right revisionary procedure is chosen.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22190231 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/revisionary-bariatric-surgery-indications-and-outcome-of-100-consecutive-operations-at-a-single-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incarcerated Hiatal Hernia After Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy: Transhiatal Versus Thoracoscopic Approach.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/incarcerated-hiatal-hernia-after-robot-assisted-esophagectomy-transhiatal-versus-thoracoscopic-approach-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/incarcerated-hiatal-hernia-after-robot-assisted-esophagectomy-transhiatal-versus-thoracoscopic-approach-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Incarcerated Hiatal Hernia After Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy: Transhiatal Versus Thoracoscopic Approach.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 29;
        Authors:  Dunn D, Banerji N
        PMID: 22205464 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Incarcerated Hiatal Hernia After Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy: Transhiatal Versus Thoracoscopic Approach.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 29;</p>
<p>Authors:  Dunn D, Banerji N</p>
<p>PMID: 22205464 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/incarcerated-hiatal-hernia-after-robot-assisted-esophagectomy-transhiatal-versus-thoracoscopic-approach-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/functional-voice-and-swallowing-outcomes-after-robotic-thyroidectomy-by-a-gasless-unilateral-axillo-breast-approach-comparison-with-open-thyroidectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/functional-voice-and-swallowing-outcomes-after-robotic-thyroidectomy-by-a-gasless-unilateral-axillo-breast-approach-comparison-with-open-thyroidectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 29;
        Authors:  Tae K, Kim KY, Yun BR, Ji YB, Park C...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 29;</p>
<p>Authors:  Tae K, Kim KY, Yun BR, Ji YB, Park CW, Kim DS, Kim TW</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Voice and swallowing alterations are common complaints after thyroidectomy, even in the absence of laryngeal nerve impairment. However, voice and swallowing functions after robotic thyroidectomy have not been thoroughly investigated. This study compared the functional outcomes for voice and swallowing after robotic thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy.                                         METHODS:                       The study prospectively analyzed the voice and swallowing functions of patients with thyroid nodules who underwent robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast (GUAB) approach (50 cases) or by conventional open thyroidectomy (61 cases) from September 2009 to October 2010. Videolaryngostroboscopy or flexible laryngoscopy was performed pre- and postoperatively. Subjective voice and swallowing alterations were assessed by questionnaire preoperatively and then 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. In addition, objective acoustic voice analysis was performed using a Multidimensional Voice Program, with Voice Range Profiles and maximum phonation times measured preoperatively and then 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.                                         RESULTS:                       Subjective postoperative voice function was significantly better in the robotic group at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively than in the open group. The mean values of fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio before and after surgery did not differ between the two groups. However, the frequency range and the highest frequency were significantly better in the robotic group than in the open group at 3 months postoperatively. Subjective swallowing function did not differ between the two groups.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Postoperative voice function is better with robotic thyroidectomy using the GUAB approach than with conventional open thyroidectomy. This is an advantage of robotic thyroidectomy by the GUAB approach in addition to the excellent cosmesis.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22205465 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/functional-voice-and-swallowing-outcomes-after-robotic-thyroidectomy-by-a-gasless-unilateral-axillo-breast-approach-comparison-with-open-thyroidectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erratum to: Long-term outcome after endoscopic stent therapy for complications after bariatric surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-long-term-outcome-after-endoscopic-stent-therapy-for-complications-after-bariatric-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-long-term-outcome-after-endoscopic-stent-therapy-for-complications-after-bariatric-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Erratum to: Long-term outcome after endoscopic stent therapy for complications after bariatric surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 29;
        Authors:  Iqbal A, Miedema B, Ramaswamy A, Fearing N, de la Torre R, Pak Y, Steffen CM, Thaler ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Erratum to: Long-term outcome after endoscopic stent therapy for complications after bariatric surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 29;</p>
<p>Authors:  Iqbal A, Miedema B, Ramaswamy A, Fearing N, de la Torre R, Pak Y, Steffen CM, Thaler K</p>
<p>PMID: 22205466 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-long-term-outcome-after-endoscopic-stent-therapy-for-complications-after-bariatric-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-long-term-results-between-laparoscopy-assisted-gastrectomy-and-open-gastrectomy-with-d2-lymph-node-dissection-for-advanced-gastric-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-long-term-results-between-laparoscopy-assisted-gastrectomy-and-open-gastrectomy-with-d2-lymph-node-dissection-for-advanced-gastric-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 30;
        Authors:  Hamabe A, Omori T, Tanaka K, Nishida...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 30;</p>
<p>Authors:  Hamabe A, Omori T, Tanaka K, Nishida T</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) has been established as a low-invasive surgery for early gastric cancer. However, it remains unknown whether it is applicable also for advanced gastric cancer, mainly because the long-term results of LAG with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer have not been well validated compared with open gastrectomy (OG).                                         METHODS:                       A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare LAG and OG with D2 lymph node dissection. For this study, 167 patients (66 LAG and 101 OG patients) who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer were reviewed. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival time were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Stratified log-rank statistical evaluation was used to compare the difference between the LAG and OG groups stratified by histologic type, pathologic T status, N status, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of LAG.                                         RESULTS:                       The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 89.6% in the LAG group and 75.8% in the OG group (nonsignificant difference; stratified log-rank statistic, 3.11; P = 0.0777). The adjusted HR of recurrence for LAG compared with OG was 0.389 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.131-1.151]. The 5-year overall survival rate was 94.4% in the LAG group and 78.5% in the OG group (nonsignificant difference; stratified log-rank statistic, 0.4817; P = 0.4877). The adjusted HR of death for LAG compared with OG was 0.633 (95% CI 0.172-2.325).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The findings show that LAG with D2 lymph node dissection is acceptable in terms of long-term results for advanced gastric cancer cases and may be applicable for advanced gastric cancer treatment.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22207307 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-long-term-results-between-laparoscopy-assisted-gastrectomy-and-open-gastrectomy-with-d2-lymph-node-dissection-for-advanced-gastric-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erratum to: Left laparoscopic paraduodenal hernia repair.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-left-laparoscopic-paraduodenal-hernia-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-left-laparoscopic-paraduodenal-hernia-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Erratum to: Left laparoscopic paraduodenal hernia repair.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 30;
        Authors:  Khalaileh A, Schlager A, Bala M, Abu-Gazala S, Elazary R, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y
        PMID: 22207308 [PubMed - as supplied by publi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Erratum to: Left laparoscopic paraduodenal hernia repair.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 30;</p>
<p>Authors:  Khalaileh A, Schlager A, Bala M, Abu-Gazala S, Elazary R, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y</p>
<p>PMID: 22207308 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/erratum-to-left-laparoscopic-paraduodenal-hernia-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy using conventional instruments for children with choledochal cysts.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-hepaticojejunostomy-using-conventional-instruments-for-children-with-choledochal-cysts/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-hepaticojejunostomy-using-conventional-instruments-for-children-with-choledochal-cysts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy using conventional instruments for children with choledochal cysts.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 30;
        Authors:  Diao M, Li L, Dong N, Li Q, Cheng W
        Abstract
        B...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy using conventional instruments for children with choledochal cysts.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec 30;</p>
<p>Authors:  Diao M, Li L, Dong N, Li Q, Cheng W</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       Single-incision laparoscopy has recently become popular in pediatric surgery. Yet there has been no report on its application in the management of choledochal cysts (CDC). The current series is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (SILH) for CDC in children.                                         METHODS:                       We reviewed 19 children who underwent SILH between April and June 2011. Early postoperative and follow-up results were compared with our historical controls.                                         RESULTS:                       The median follow-up period was 3 months. Two procedures were converted to the conventional four-port laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies. SILH was successfully completed in 17 patients (median age: 3.00 years; F/M: 12/5). Early in the series, one patient developed bile leak, which stopped spontaneously after 10 days of drainage. The mean operative time of the SILH group did not differ from that of our conventional laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (CLH) controls (3.06 vs. 3.04 h, P = 0.909). The average postoperative hospital stay, time to full feed, and duration of drainage in the SILH group were comparable to our historical controls of CLH (P = 0.056, 0.472, 0.619, respectively).                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       In experienced hands, SILH is safe and its short-term results are comparable to CLH. It potentially provides a viable surgical alternative for CDC.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22207309 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-incision-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-hepaticojejunostomy-using-conventional-instruments-for-children-with-choledochal-cysts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Body temperature evaluation during induced pneumoperitoneum with CO(2): an experimental study in pigs.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/body-temperature-evaluation-during-induced-pneumoperitoneum-with-co2-an-experimental-study-in-pigs/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/body-temperature-evaluation-during-induced-pneumoperitoneum-with-co2-an-experimental-study-in-pigs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Body temperature evaluation during induced pneumoperitoneum with CO(2): an experimental study in pigs.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;
        Authors:  Rezende M, Prado O, Bandeira C, Petri A, Montero E
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Body temperature evaluation during induced pneumoperitoneum with CO(2): an experimental study in pigs.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Rezende M, Prado O, Bandeira C, Petri A, Montero E</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       In prolonged laparoscopic procedures, hypothermia is frequently observed. The possible influence of the vasodilating action of CO(2), due to its increased levels in the blood during the laparoscopic procedures, has yet to be studied. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate body temperature patterns in pigs subjected to pneumoperitoneum with CO(2).                                         METHODS:                       Thirty male pigs were allocated into three groups of ten animals each: group I, anesthetic procedure and abdominal puncture only; group II, the same as for group I and insufflation with CO(2); and group III, the same as for group I and insufflation with medical grade compressed air. After anesthetic induction and surgical preparation, rectal and esophageal temperatures were measured every 10 min. Blood was collected during the experiment for the gasometric measurement of pCO(2). Animals were insufflated with no gas loss and were kept anesthetized for 180 min. For statistical analysis, Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used at a level of significance of 95% (P &lt; 0.05).                                         RESULTS:                       Animals in groups I and II (P = 0.000) had a statistically significant drop in both esophageal and rectal temperatures during the experiment, but not animals in group III. However, when the groups were compared among themselves, no statistically significant differences were found at any of the times measured. A statistically significant drop in pCO(2) levels was observed for groups I and III, but not for animals in groups II.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The use of CO(2) did not significantly affect body temperature variation in pigs subjected to pneumoperitoneum. However, CO(2) produced a temperature drop pattern different than that of compressed air, indicating that CO(2) may lead to thermoregulatory changes and influence the peripheral temperature drop.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22219006 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/body-temperature-evaluation-during-induced-pneumoperitoneum-with-co2-an-experimental-study-in-pigs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plasma soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 levels are persistently elevated during the first month after colorectal cancer resection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/plasma-soluble-vascular-adhesion-molecule-1-levels-are-persistently-elevated-during-the-first-month-after-colorectal-cancer-resection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/plasma-soluble-vascular-adhesion-molecule-1-levels-are-persistently-elevated-during-the-first-month-after-colorectal-cancer-resection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Plasma soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 levels are persistently elevated during the first month after colorectal cancer resection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;
        Authors:  Shantha Kumara HM, Tohme ST, Herath SA, Yan X, Senagore...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Plasma soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 levels are persistently elevated during the first month after colorectal cancer resection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Shantha Kumara HM, Tohme ST, Herath SA, Yan X, Senagore AJ, Nasar A, Kalady MF, Baxter R, Whelan RL</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION:                       Plasma from the second and third weeks after minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) has high levels of the proangiogenic proteins VEGF and angiopoietin 2 and also stimulates, in vitro, endothelial cell (EC) proliferation and migration, which are critical to wound and tumor angiogenesis. Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) stimulates EC chemotaxis and angiogenesis. The impact of MICR on blood levels of sVCAM-1 is unknown. This study&#8217;s purpose was to determine plasma sVCAM-1 levels after MICR in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.                                         METHODS:                       Blood samples from 90 patients (26% rectal, 74% colon) were obtained preoperatively, on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3, and at other points during the next 2 months. The late samples were bundled into 7-day time blocks. sVCAM-1 levels were determined in duplicate via ELISA and reported as ng/ml. Student&#8217;s t test was used for data analysis (significance, P &lt; 0.008 after Bonferroni correction).                                         RESULTS:                       The mean incision length was 7.3 ± 3.1 cm, and the conversion rate was 3%. Compared with preoperative (PreOp) levels (811.3 ± 233.2), the mean plasma sVCAM-1 level was significantly higher on POD 1 (905.7 ± 292.4, P &lt; 0.001) and POD 3 (977.7 ± 271.8, P &lt; 0.001). Levels remained significantly elevated for the POD 7-13, POD 14-20, POD 21-27, and POD 28-67 time blocks.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       MICR for CRC is associated with a persistent increase in plasma sVCAM-1 levels during the first month. This sustained increase may promote angiogenesis and stimulate the growth of residual tumor cells early after surgery.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22219007 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/plasma-soluble-vascular-adhesion-molecule-1-levels-are-persistently-elevated-during-the-first-month-after-colorectal-cancer-resection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: preoperative radiochemotherapy versus surgery alone.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-surgery-for-rectal-cancer-preoperative-radiochemotherapy-versus-surgery-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-surgery-for-rectal-cancer-preoperative-radiochemotherapy-versus-surgery-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: preoperative radiochemotherapy versus surgery alone.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;
        Authors:  Denost Q, Laurent C, Paumet T, Quintane L, Martenot M, Rullier E
        Abstract
        BACKGRO...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: preoperative radiochemotherapy versus surgery alone.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Denost Q, Laurent C, Paumet T, Quintane L, Martenot M, Rullier E</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       A few studies have suggested advantages of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. However, the role of laparoscopy has not been clearly defined specifically in cases after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative radiotherapy on the feasibility of laparoscopic rectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal cancer.                                         METHODS:                       From 1999 to 2010, the authors considered all patients treated by laparoscopic rectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. Patients treated by long-course preoperative radiochemotherapy (45 Gy during 5 weeks) were compared with those treated by surgery alone. The end points of the study were mortality, conversion, and overall and surgical morbidity.                                         RESULTS:                       Among 422 patients treated by laparoscopic conservative rectal excision, 292 received preoperative radiotherapy, and 130 had surgery alone. The two groups were similar in sex, age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. The mortality rate was 0.3% in the radiotherapy group and 0.8% in the surgical group (P = 0.52). The two groups did not differ in terms of conversion (19 vs. 15%; P = 0.39), overall morbidity (37 vs. 29%; P = 0.14), surgical morbidity (20 vs. 18%; P = 0.60), or anastomotic leakage (13 vs. 11%; P = 0.54). Multivariate analysis showed male gender and synchronous metastasis as independent factors of surgical morbidity. The independent factors of conversion were male gender, obesity, tumor stage, and type of anastomosis. Preoperative radiotherapy influenced neither conversion nor surgical morbidity.                                         CONCLUSION:                       Long-course radiochemotherapy does not have an impact on the feasibility or short-term outcome of laparoscopic conservative rectal excision for rectal cancer.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22219008 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-surgery-for-rectal-cancer-preoperative-radiochemotherapy-versus-surgery-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/evaluation-of-a-knitted-polytetrafluoroethylene-mesh-placed-intraperitoneally-in-a-new-zealand-white-rabbit-model/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/evaluation-of-a-knitted-polytetrafluoroethylene-mesh-placed-intraperitoneally-in-a-new-zealand-white-rabbit-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;
        Authors:  Novotný T, Jeřábek J, Veselý K, Staffa R, Dvořák M, Cagaš J
        ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Novotný T, Jeřábek J, Veselý K, Staffa R, Dvořák M, Cagaš J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The intraperitoneal application of surgical mesh remains a controversial issue because of possible complications, especially adhesion and fistula formation. This study aimed to assess the potential of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh for intraabdominal implantation.                                         METHODS:                       Twenty-eight 5 × 5 cm samples of knitted macroporous PTFE mesh and light-weight polypropylene mesh (LW-PP) were implanted intraperitoneally in 14 New Zealand white rabbits in a randomized manner and fixed using eight polypropylene stitches. After 90 days, the adhesion formation, adhesion score, shrinkage, strength of fixation to the abdominal wall, and histologic biocompatibility were assessed.                                         RESULTS:                       No intraoperative or anesthesia-related complications or mesh infection were recorded. The average area covered by adhesions was 4.7 ± 7.2% for the PTFE and 36.4 ± 36.1% for the LW-PP. The median adhesion score was 0 for the PTFE and 8 for the LW-PP. Shrinkage was 36.9 ± 12.9% for the PTFE mesh and 12.6 ± 8.72% for the LW-PP. The mesh-to-abdominal wall fixation strength was almost the same for both materials (PTFE 3.6 ± 1.9 vs. LW-PP 3.6 ± 2.9). The inflammatory cell count was almost the same for the two groups, with no statistically significant difference. The width of the inner granuloma was equal (PTFE 10.5 ± 0.9 vs. LW-PP 11.1 ± 0.9). The outer granuloma was reduced significantly in the PTFE group (PTFE 23.0 ± 2.1 vs. LW-PP 33.6 ± 7.9). One of the animals in the PTFE group died on postoperative day 12 because of ileus. The reason was an adhesion of the small intestine to the polypropylene fixation stitch, which caused small intestine strangulation.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The knitted PTFE mesh induces fewer intraperitoneal adhesions of lower density than the light-weight polypropylene mesh. The strength of the knitted PTFE mesh fixation to the abdominal wall is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene mesh, but the shrinkage is greater. The biocompatibility of the knitted PTFE mesh is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene implant.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22219009 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/evaluation-of-a-knitted-polytetrafluoroethylene-mesh-placed-intraperitoneally-in-a-new-zealand-white-rabbit-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-term results of ablation with antireflux surgery for Barrett&#8217;s esophagus: a clinical and molecular biologic study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/long-term-results-of-ablation-with-antireflux-surgery-for-barretts-esophagus-a-clinical-and-molecular-biologic-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/long-term-results-of-ablation-with-antireflux-surgery-for-barretts-esophagus-a-clinical-and-molecular-biologic-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Long-term results of ablation with antireflux surgery for Barrett's esophagus: a clinical and molecular biologic study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;
        Authors:  Kauttu T, Räsänen J, Krogerus L, Sihvo E, Puolakkainen P, Salo JA
  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Long-term results of ablation with antireflux surgery for Barrett&#8217;s esophagus: a clinical and molecular biologic study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kauttu T, Räsänen J, Krogerus L, Sihvo E, Puolakkainen P, Salo JA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND:                       The initial results from ablation therapy for metaplastic/dysplastic Barrett&#8217;s esophagus (BE) are promising, but the results of extended follow-up evaluation are seldom reported.                                         METHODS:                       Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser ablation and successful antireflux surgery for 18 patients with metaplastic BE primarily resulted in the total histologic eradication of BE in 15 patients (83%). After antireflux surgery, the healing of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was objectively verified in all the patients. At late follow-up evaluation, endoscopy, conventional histology, molecular oxidative stress analyses in comparison with normal control conditions (8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine [8-OHdG], superoxide dismutase [SOD], glutathione [GSH], myeloperoxydase [MP]), and immunohistochemistry (p53, and Cdx2, caudal-related homeobox gene 2, marking intestinal differentiation) of the neosquamous epithelium were performed.                                         RESULTS:                       At the end of the follow-up period (range, 3-15 years; mean, 8 years), intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia was detected histologically in eight patients (44%). Six patients had macroscopic BE (mean length, 3.5 cm; range 1-10 cm). The neosquamous epithelium was histologically normal, with no underlying columnar tissue. The fundoplication was endoscopically normal in 14 patients (82%). The 8-OHdG level was higher in the neosquamous epithelium than in the control conditions in the distal esophagus (4.3 vs. 0.52; P = 0.0002) and the proximal esophagus (1.8 vs. 0.95; P = 0.006). Likewise, SOD activity was higher in the neosquamous epithelium (0.38 vs. 0.12; P = 0.0005), whereas MP activity and GSH levels remained normal. Three patients showed slight nuclear p53 expression (typical in normal inflammatory reactions), whereas Cdx2 positivity was confined to one case with recurrent intestinal metaplasia.                                         CONCLUSIONS:                       The neosquamous mucosa, generated by the ablation of BE and the treatment of GERD with fundoplication, was stable during long-term follow-up evaluation in two-thirds of the patients with initial eradication. It had normal p53 expression and no Cdx2 protein expression. The oxidative stress of the neosquamous esophagus remained high, although the clinical significance of this is unclear.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22219010 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/long-term-results-of-ablation-with-antireflux-surgery-for-barretts-esophagus-a-clinical-and-molecular-biologic-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

