<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JSurg &#187; Surgical Endoscopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jsurg.com/blog/category/surgical-endoscopy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jsurg.com</link>
	<description>{ JournAll of Surgery }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:31:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-resection-of-large-pedunculated-colonic-polyps-and-risk-of-postpolypectomy-bleeding-with-adrenaline-injection-versus-endoloop-and-hemoclip-a-prospective-randomized-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-resection-of-large-pedunculated-colonic-polyps-and-risk-of-postpolypectomy-bleeding-with-adrenaline-injection-versus-endoloop-and-hemoclip-a-prospective-randomized-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 16:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randomized Controlled Trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study.
        Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2732-7
        Autho...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2732-7</p>
<p>Authors:  Kouklakis G, Mpoumponaris A, Gatopoulou A, Efraimidou E, Manolas K, Lirantzopoulos N</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Postpolypectomy bleeding is a major complication, especially in large pedunculated colonic polyps. Several endoscopic techniques have been evolved for prevention of bleeding episodes. The aim of this study is to evaluate postpolypectomy bleeding rates in large (&gt;2 cm) pedunculated colonic polyps using either adrenaline injection alone or loop and clip application as prophylactic methods.<br/><br />
        MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with one pedunculated colonic polyps (&gt;2 cm) were included in a double-blind study and studied prospectively. Exclusion criteria were coexistence of other large polyps, antiplatelet, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin. In group A (n = 32), adrenaline (1:10,000) was injected in the base of the stalk followed by conventional polypectomy using mixed coagulation and cutting current. In group B (n = 32), a detachable snare was placed at the base of the stalk followed by conventional polypectomy and clip application in the residual stalk above the snare. We evaluate the efficacy of combined endoscopic methods in early and late postpolypectomy bleeding rate in large pedunculated colonic polyps, severity of bleeding, days of hospitalization, and required transfusions.<br/><br />
        RESULTS: Overall, bleeding complications occurred in 5/64 patients (7.81%). In group A (adrenaline injection alone), four patients (12.5%) had a bleeding episode: two (6.25%) occurred during the first 24 h and two (6.25%) between days 7 and 14 from the procedure. In group B only one patient (3.12%) had a late bleeding episode (p = 0.02). Severity of late bleeding in group B patients (one moderate bleeding) versus group A patients (one moderate and one severe bleeding) and need for transfusions (1 versus 5 blood units) were lower (p = 0.02). Hospitalization days did not differ between the two groups, but colonoscopy time was significantly higher in group B versus group A (p = 0.04).<br/><br />
        CONCLUSION: Combined endoscopic techniques seem to be more effective in preventing postpolypectomy bleeding in large pedunculated colonic polyps.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 19430833 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-resection-of-large-pedunculated-colonic-polyps-and-risk-of-postpolypectomy-bleeding-with-adrenaline-injection-versus-endoloop-and-hemoclip-a-prospective-randomized-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/systemic-inflammatory-response-after-kugel-versus-laparoscopic-groin-hernia-repair-a-prospective-randomized-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/systemic-inflammatory-response-after-kugel-versus-laparoscopic-groin-hernia-repair-a-prospective-randomized-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randomized Controlled Trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2657-61
        Authors:  Bender O, Balcı FL, Yüney E, Sağlam F, Ozdenkaya Y, Sarı Y...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2657-61</p>
<p>Authors:  Bender O, Balcı FL, Yüney E, Sağlam F, Ozdenkaya Y, Sarı YS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Kugel repair, a minimally invasive technique, has become an alternative to laparoscopic groin hernia repair, but the technique has not been adequately evaluated by assessment of objective parameters. A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out to compare the systemic inflammatory response to surgical trauma and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent groin hernia repair by the Kugel and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic methods.<br/><br />
        METHODS: Forty consecutive patients admitted for unilateral groin hernia were randomized to Kugel (n = 20) or TEP (n = 20) repair under general anesthesia. Operation time, length of hospital stay, pain severity, time to return to normal activities, cost, and systemic inflammatory and hormone responses to surgical trauma were compared.<br/><br />
        RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in duration of operation, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, or mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score (p &gt; 0.05 for each). Serum cortisol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations before surgery, and 1 and 24 h after surgery, did not differ significantly in the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). There were no recurrences or complications during follow-up. Cost per patient was US $546 lower in the Kugel group.<br/><br />
        CONCLUSION: Kugel herniorrhaphy is a minimally invasive technique that offers all the advantages of TEP and is more cost-effective.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 19440788 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/systemic-inflammatory-response-after-kugel-versus-laparoscopic-groin-hernia-repair-a-prospective-randomized-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/transumbilical-single-port-sleeve-gastrectomy-initial-experience-and-comparative-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/transumbilical-single-port-sleeve-gastrectomy-initial-experience-and-comparative-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Delgado S, Ibarzabal A, Adelsdorfer C, Adelsdorfer W, Corcelles R, Momblán D, Lacy AM
        Abstra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Delgado S, Ibarzabal A, Adelsdorfer C, Adelsdorfer W, Corcelles R, Momblán D, Lacy AM</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy is gaining relevance in the surgical armamentarium against obesity. The transumbilical single port has proved to be an attractive and safe alternative for a variety of minimally invasive abdominal surgeries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the initial results of a group of patients operated by single-port sleeve gastrectomy compared with a group operated by conventional laparoscopic technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present a prospective cohort study of two groups of consecutive patients with body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 55 kg/m(2), with an indication of sleeve gastrectomy. In 20 patients, we used a transumbilical single-port (TUSP) technique; in 22 patients, we used the conventional laparoscopic (CL) technique. All surgeries were performed between June and December 2009 in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Hospital Clínic, Barcelona. The same medical team, in a standardized fashion, carried out all surgeries. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in body mass index (BMI), age, sex, number and type of comorbidities, or history of previous abdominal surgery. Operative time (79.2 min) was significantly higher in the TUSP group (p = 0.002) than in the CL group (54.1 min). There were no conversions to open surgery in any of the patients operated upon via CL, but one conversion to laparoscopic surgery, requiring the addition of three trocars, in the TUSP group. There were no significant differences in morbidity or hospital stay between the groups. Percentage excess weight loss and excess BMI loss at 3 and 6 months, as indexes for improvement and resolution of comorbidities associated with obesity, showed that there were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy has proved to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, with results that are similar to those obtained with conventional laparoscopic surgery.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476824 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/transumbilical-single-port-sleeve-gastrectomy-initial-experience-and-comparative-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Argon plasma coagulator in a 2-month-old child with tracheoesophageal fistula.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/argon-plasma-coagulator-in-a-2-month-old-child-with-tracheoesophageal-fistula/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/argon-plasma-coagulator-in-a-2-month-old-child-with-tracheoesophageal-fistula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Argon plasma coagulator in a 2-month-old child with tracheoesophageal fistula.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Nardo GD, Oliva S, Barbato M, Aloi M, Midulla F, Roggini M, Valitutti F, Frediani S, Cucchiara S
        Abstra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Argon plasma coagulator in a 2-month-old child with tracheoesophageal fistula.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Nardo GD, Oliva S, Barbato M, Aloi M, Midulla F, Roggini M, Valitutti F, Frediani S, Cucchiara S</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        A 2 month-old boy was admitted to the authors&#8217; hospital because of regurgitation and persistent cough during breastfeeding. A chest X-ray examination and a barium esophagogram disclosed small amounts of barium passing in the trachea, suggesting a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Bronchoscopy combined with upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy performed with the patient under general anesthesia confirmed the fistula. The TEF was treated by injection of 1 ml Glubran 2 from the esophageal side. A nasogastric tube was placed for feedings, and 7 days later, a barium esophagogram showed a reduction of caliber but not complete closure of the TEF. Unsuccessful fistula obliteration with Glubran was attributed to technical difficulties in catheterization of the fistula orifice, mainly resulting from its close proximity to the upper esophageal sphincter and to its small caliber. Therefore, an argon plasma coagulator (APC) probe with a circumferentially oriented nozzle was used from the esophageal side as an alternative technique to fulgurate the residual fistula orifice (see video). A nasogastric tube was placed for feedings. Oral feeding was started 7 days later when a barium esophagogram confirmed complete fistula closure. At the 2-year follow-up visit, the boy was asymptomatic, and the barium esophagogram was negative. This report describes a case in which esophagoscopy gave a clear view of the fistula due to its direction from esophagus to trachea. Complete fistula obliteration was not obtained with Glubran. However, APC was successfully used to close the residual fistula orifice. The authors suggest that APC can be used as an alternative endoscopic technique to repair TEF when other techniques fail.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476825 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/argon-plasma-coagulator-in-a-2-month-old-child-with-tracheoesophageal-fistula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-prospective-study-demonstrating-the-reliability-and-validity-of-two-procedure-specific-evaluation-tools-to-assess-operative-competence-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-prospective-study-demonstrating-the-reliability-and-validity-of-two-procedure-specific-evaluation-tools-to-assess-operative-competence-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Palter VN, Grantcharov TP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Palter VN, Grantc...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Palter VN, Grantcharov TP</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is considered an advanced minimally invasive procedure with a long, variable learning curve. Developing an evaluation tool is essential to ensure that individuals reach a certain level of competence prior to performing this procedure independently. To achieve standardization and wide implementation, an assessment tool must be reflective of practice across many institutions. STUDY DESIGN: The purpose of this study is to validate two procedure-specific evaluation tools for laparoscopic colorectal surgery that were developed using innovative consensus methodology. Two procedure-specific rating scales for laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomy were created using the Delphi method. Nine novice and nine expert laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy videos were prospectively collected, and nine novice and ten expert laparoscopic right colectomy videos were recorded. The experts rated the videos using the procedure-specific technical skills evaluation tool for either laparoscopic right colectomy or laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between the expert and novice scores on the laparoscopic right colectomy evaluation tool: the median score of novices was 63.8% and the expert score was 73.1% (p = 0.02). Similarly, there was a significant difference between the median novice score on the sigmoid tool (58.6%) compared with the median expert score (70.7%) (p = 0.003). Cronbach&#8217;s alpha was 0.82 for the right colectomy evaluation tool and 0.79 for the sigmoid rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure-specific evaluation tools for laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomy demonstrate strong reliability and construct validity, and have the potential to be used for technical skills assessment and feedback.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476826 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-prospective-study-demonstrating-the-reliability-and-validity-of-two-procedure-specific-evaluation-tools-to-assess-operative-competence-in-laparoscopic-colorectal-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reply to: a letter to the editors: Re: minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-a-letter-to-the-editors-re-minimally-invasive-oesophagectomy-current-status-and-future-direction/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-a-letter-to-the-editors-re-minimally-invasive-oesophagectomy-current-status-and-future-direction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Reply to: a letter to the editors: Re: minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Memon MA, Butler N, Collins S, Memon B
        PMID: 22476827 [PubMed - as supp...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Reply to: a letter to the editors: Re: minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Memon MA, Butler N, Collins S, Memon B</p>
<p>PMID: 22476827 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-a-letter-to-the-editors-re-minimally-invasive-oesophagectomy-current-status-and-future-direction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/tensile-strength-testing-for-resorbable-mesh-fixation-systems-in-laparoscopic-ventral-hernia-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/tensile-strength-testing-for-resorbable-mesh-fixation-systems-in-laparoscopic-ventral-hernia-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F, De Somer F, Vercauteren G, Vanoverbeke I, Chiers K, Troisi R
   ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F, De Somer F, Vercauteren G, Vanoverbeke I, Chiers K, Troisi R</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: In an attempt to improve patient outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, resorbable fixation devices have been developed to allow adequate mesh fixation while minimizing accompanying side-effects as tack erosion and adhesion formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In experimental set-up, 24 pigs were treated by laparoscopic mesh placement. Two different meshes (PP/ORC and PP/ePTFE) and four fixation devices were evaluated: a 6.4 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide pushpin (tack I), a 6.8 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide with blunt tip (tack II), a 4.1 mm poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) (tack III) and one titanium tack (control tack). A first group of animals (n = 12) was euthanized after 2 weeks survival and a second group (n = 12) after 6 months. At euthanasia, a relaparoscopy was performed to assess adhesion formation followed by laparotomy with excision of the entire abdominal wall. Tensile strength of the individual fixation systems was tested with the use of a tensiometer by measuring the force to pull the tack out of the mesh. Additionally, the foreign body reaction to the fixation systems was evaluated histologically as was their potential degradation. RESULTS: At 2 weeks the tensile strength was significantly higher for the control tack (31.98 N/cm²) compared to the resorbable devices. Except for tack II, the tensile strength was higher when the devices were fixed in a PP/ePTFE mesh compared to the PP/ORC mesh. After 6 months only tack III was completely resorbed, while tack I (9.292 N/cm²) had the lowest tensile strength. At this time-point similar tensile strength was observed for both tack II (29.56 N/cm²) and the control tack (27.77 N/cm²). Adhesions seem to be more depending on the type of mesh, in favor of PP/ePTFE. CONCLUSION: At long term, the 4.1 mm poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) tack was the only tack completely resorbed while the 6.8 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide tack with blunt tip reached equal strengths to the permanent tack.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476828 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/tensile-strength-testing-for-resorbable-mesh-fixation-systems-in-laparoscopic-ventral-hernia-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLEEVEPASS: A randomized prospective multicenter study comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: preliminary results.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/sleevepass-a-randomized-prospective-multicenter-study-comparing-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-and-gastric-bypass-in-the-treatment-of-morbid-obesity-preliminary-results/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/sleevepass-a-randomized-prospective-multicenter-study-comparing-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-and-gastric-bypass-in-the-treatment-of-morbid-obesity-preliminary-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        SLEEVEPASS: A randomized prospective multicenter study comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: preliminary results.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Helmiö M, Victor...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>SLEEVEPASS: A randomized prospective multicenter study comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: preliminary results.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Helmiö M, Victorzon M, Ovaska J, Leivonen M, Juuti A, Jaser N, Peromaa P, Tolonen P, Hurme S, Salminen P</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in the treatment of morbid obesity has been demonstrated. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as a single procedure has shown promising short-term results, but the long-term efficacy of SG has not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to determine the preliminary 30-day morbidity and mortality of RYGB and SG in a prospective multicenter randomized setting. METHODS: A total of 240 morbidly obese (BMI = 35-66 kg/m²) patients evaluated by a multidisciplinary team were randomized to undergo either RYGB or SG. There were 117 patients in the RYGB group and 121 in the SG group; two patients had to be excluded after randomization. Both study groups were comparable regarding age, gender, BMI, and comorbidities. RESULTS: There was no 30-day mortality. The median operating time was significantly shorter in the SG group (66 min vs. 94 min, p &lt; 0.001). All complications were recorded thoroughly. There were 7 (5.8 %) major complications following SG and 11 (9.4 %) after RYGB (p = 0.292). Nine (7.4 %) SG patients and 20 (17.1 %) RYGB patients had minor complications (p = 0.023). The overall morbidity was 13.2 % after SG and 26.5 % after RYGB (p = 0.010). There were three (2.5 %) early reoperations after SG and four (3.3 %) after RYGB (p = 0.719). CONCLUSIONS: At 30-day analysis SG is associated with a shorter operating time and fewer early minor complications compared to RYGB. There were no significant differences in major complications or early reoperations. Long-term follow-up is required to determine the effect on weight loss, resolution of obesity-related comorbidities, and improvement of quality of life.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476829 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/sleevepass-a-randomized-prospective-multicenter-study-comparing-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-and-gastric-bypass-in-the-treatment-of-morbid-obesity-preliminary-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Totally stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis using hybrid NOTES: single 12-mm trocar approach in a porcine model.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/totally-stapled-gastrojejunal-anastomosis-using-hybrid-notes-single-12-mm-trocar-approach-in-a-porcine-model/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/totally-stapled-gastrojejunal-anastomosis-using-hybrid-notes-single-12-mm-trocar-approach-in-a-porcine-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Totally stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis using hybrid NOTES: single 12-mm trocar approach in a porcine model.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Polese L, Merigliano S, Mungo B, Rizzato R, Luisetto R, Ancona E, Norberto L
  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Totally stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis using hybrid NOTES: single 12-mm trocar approach in a porcine model.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Polese L, Merigliano S, Mungo B, Rizzato R, Luisetto R, Ancona E, Norberto L</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a totally stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis performed using one transabdominal 12-mm trocar and a gastroscope in a porcine model. METHODS: The procedure was carried out on six domestic pigs weighing 45 kg using a hybrid technique with a gastroscope and a 12-mm Hasson trocar, positioned in the left hypochondrium. At the end of the procedure a mechanical circular 21-mm gastrojejunal anastomosis was performed by inserting the stapler through a small gastrotomy after enlarging the trocar incision. RESULTS: In all six cases the procedure was completed through a single 3 cm abdominal incision and without complications. The mean operating time was 2 h, and endoscopic investigation showed that the anastomoses were intact, patent, and airtight. CONCLUSIONS: Totally stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis using a hybrid NOTES-single 12-mm trocar approach is a feasible procedure in the porcine model. Further survival studies are warranted, particularly to evaluate the functional results of this procedure.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476830 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/totally-stapled-gastrojejunal-anastomosis-using-hybrid-notes-single-12-mm-trocar-approach-in-a-porcine-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site(®) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/cholecystectomy-using-a-novel-single-site%c2%ae-robotic-platform-early-experience-from-45-consecutive-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/cholecystectomy-using-a-novel-single-site%c2%ae-robotic-platform-early-experience-from-45-consecutive-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site(®) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M
        Abstra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site(®) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to study the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy using a novel platform from Intuitive Surgical. METHODS: All operations were performed by the same surgeon. Parameters assessed included patient history, indication for surgery, operation time, complication rate, conversion rate, robot-related issues, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and time to return to work. All patients were followed for a 2-month period postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (22 women, 23 men) underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy from March 1 to July 15, 2011. There were no conversions to either conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy, although in three cases a second trocar was used. There were no major complications apart from a single case of postoperative hemorrhage. Average patient age was 47 ± 12 years (range = 27-80 years) and average BMI was 30 kg/m(2) (mean = 28.8 ± 4 kg/m(2), range = 18.4-46.7 kg/m(2)). The primary indication for surgery was gallstones. The mean operation time (skin-to-skin) was 84.5 ± 25.5 min (range = 51-175 min), docking time was 5.8 ± 1.5 min (range = 4-11 min), and console time (net surgical time) was 43 ± 21.9 min (range = 21-121 min). Intraoperative blood loss was negligible. There were no collisions between the robotic arms and no other robot-related problems. Average postoperative length of stay was less than 24 h. The mean Visual Analog Pain Scale Score 6 h after the operation was 2.2 ± 1.51 (range = 0-6) and patients returned to normal activities in 4.48 ± 2.3 days (range = 1-9 days). CONCLUSIONS: Single-Site(®) is a new platform offering a potentially more stable and reliable environment to perform single-port cholecystectomy. Both simple and complicated cholecystectomies can be performed with safety. The technique is possible in patients with a high BMI. The induction of pneumoperitoneum using the new port and the docking process require additional training.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476831 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/cholecystectomy-using-a-novel-single-site%c2%ae-robotic-platform-early-experience-from-45-consecutive-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-head-to-head-comparison-between-virtual-reality-and-physical-reality-simulation-training-for-basic-skills-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-head-to-head-comparison-between-virtual-reality-and-physical-reality-simulation-training-for-basic-skills-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Loukas C, Nikiteas N, Schizas D, Lahanas V, Georgiou E
        Abstra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Loukas C, Nikiteas N, Schizas D, Lahanas V, Georgiou E</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether basic laparoscopic skills acquired with a virtual reality simulator (LapVR™) are transferable to a standard video trainer (VT) and vice versa. METHODS: Three basic tasks were considered: peg transfer, cutting, and knot-tying. The physical models were custom-built as identical copies of the virtual models. Forty-four novices were randomized into two equal groups to be trained on the LapVR™ or the VT. Each task was practiced separately 12 times. Transferability of skills from one modality to the other was assessed by performing the same task on the alternative modality before and after training (crossover assessment). Performance metrics included path length, time, and penalty score. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated significant performance curves for all tasks and metrics (p &lt; 0.05). Plateaus were statistically equivalent between the groups for each task in terms of path length and time, and across all tasks in terms of the penalty score (p &lt; 0.05). When each group was tested on the alternative modality there was a significant improvement for all tasks and metrics (p &lt; 0.05). Comparing the plateau performance of one group with the performance achieved on the same simulator by the other group we found (a) no statistical deference in the penalty score (p &lt; 0.05), (b) a statistical difference in time and path length for cutting and knot-tying (p &lt; 0.05), and (c) an equal time performance for peg transfer (p &lt; 0.05) but not for path length (p &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both modalities provided significant enhancement of the novices&#8217; performance. The skills learned on the LapVR™ are transferable to the VT and vice versa. However, training with one modality does not necessarily mean a performance equivalent to that achieved with the other modality.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476832 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-head-to-head-comparison-between-virtual-reality-and-physical-reality-simulation-training-for-basic-skills-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1485-0: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: &quot;narrow pelvis&quot; is not a contradiction.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s00464-010-1485-0-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-the-difficulty-of-laparoscopic-anterior-resection-for-rectal-cancer-narrow-pelvis-is-not-a-contradiction/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s00464-010-1485-0-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-the-difficulty-of-laparoscopic-anterior-resection-for-rectal-cancer-narrow-pelvis-is-not-a-contradiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1485-0: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contradiction.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Fernánd...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1485-0: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: &#8220;narrow pelvis&#8221; is not a contradiction.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Fernández-Ananín S, Targarona EM, Balagué C, Martínez C, Hernández P, Trías M</p>
<p>PMID: 22476833 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s00464-010-1485-0-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-the-difficulty-of-laparoscopic-anterior-resection-for-rectal-cancer-narrow-pelvis-is-not-a-contradiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urogenital function following laparoscopic and open rectal cancer resection: a comparative study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/urogenital-function-following-laparoscopic-and-open-rectal-cancer-resection-a-comparative-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/urogenital-function-following-laparoscopic-and-open-rectal-cancer-resection-a-comparative-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Urogenital function following laparoscopic and open rectal cancer resection: a comparative study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  McGlone ER, Khan O, Flashman K, Khan J, Parvaiz A
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Sexua...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Urogenital function following laparoscopic and open rectal cancer resection: a comparative study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  McGlone ER, Khan O, Flashman K, Khan J, Parvaiz A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Sexual and urinary dysfunction is an established risk after pelvic surgery. Studies examining sexual and urinary function following laparoscopic and open rectal surgery give conflicting evidence for outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of the surgical technique on functional outcomes following laparoscopic or open resection for rectal cancer patients in a high-volume laparoscopic unit. METHODS: All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer between September 2006 and September 2009 were identified from a prospectively collated database. Validated standardized postal questionnaires were sent to surviving patients to assess their postoperative sexual and urinary function. The functional data were then quantified using previously validated indices of function. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were identified from the database, of whom 144 (83 %) responded to the questionnaire-based study. Seventy-eight respondents had undergone laparoscopic rectal resection (49 men and 29 women), and 65 had an open procedure (41 men and 24 women). Both open surgery and laparoscopic surgery were associated with deterioration in urinary and sexual function. With regard to urinary function, there was no difference in the deterioration in open and laparoscopic groups in either gender. With regard to sexual function, in males one component of sexual function, namely, the incidence of successful penetration, showed less deterioration in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.04). However, in females, laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly better outcomes in all aspects of sexual activity, specifically sexual arousal (p = 0.005), lubrication (p = 0.001), orgasm (p = 0.04), and the incidence of dyspareunia (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with significantly less deterioration in sexual function compared with open surgery. This effect is particularly pronounced in women.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476834 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/urogenital-function-following-laparoscopic-and-open-rectal-cancer-resection-a-comparative-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-cost-of-surgical-training-analysis-of-operative-time-for-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-cost-of-surgical-training-analysis-of-operative-time-for-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  von Strauss Und Torney M, Dell-Kuster S, Mechera R, Rosenthal R, Langer I
        Abstract
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  von Strauss Und Torney M, Dell-Kuster S, Mechera R, Rosenthal R, Langer I</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Duration of surgery is a main cost factor of surgical training. The purpose of this analysis of operative times for laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) was to quantify the extra time and related costs in regards to the surgeons&#8217; experience in the operating room (OR). METHODS: All LC performed between January 01, 2005 and December 31, 2008 in 46 hospitals reporting to the database of the Swiss Association for Quality Management in Surgery (AQC) were analyzed (n = 10,010). Four levels of seniority were specified: resident (R), junior consultant (JC), senior consultant (SC), and attending surgeon (AS). The differences in operative time according to seniority were investigated in a multivariable log-linear and median regression analysis controlling for possible confounders. The OR costs were calculated by using a full cost rate in a teaching hospital. RESULTS: A total of 9,208 LC were available for analysis; 802 had to be excluded due to missing data (n = 212) or secondary major operations (n = 590). Twenty-eight percent of the LC were performed by R as teaching operations (n = 2,591). Compared with R, the multivariable analysis of operative time showed a median difference of -2.5 min (-9.0; 4.8) for JC and -18 min (-25; -11) for SC and -28 min (-35; -10) for AS, respectively. The OR minute costs were &lt;euro&gt;17.57, resulting in incremental costs of &lt;euro&gt;492 (159; 615) per operation in case of tutorial assistance. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of LC performed as tutorial assistance for R remains low. Surgical training in the OR causes relevant case-related extra time and therefore costs.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476835 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-cost-of-surgical-training-analysis-of-operative-time-for-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-virtual-reality-simulator-dv-trainer%c2%ae-is-a-valid-assessment-tool-for-robotic-surgical-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-virtual-reality-simulator-dv-trainer%c2%ae-is-a-valid-assessment-tool-for-robotic-surgical-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Jehl JP, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J
        Abstract
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Jehl JP, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Exponential development of minimally invasive techniques, such as robotic-assisted devices, raises the question of how to assess robotic surgery skills. Early development of virtual simulators has provided efficient tools for laparoscopic skills certification based on objective scoring, high availability, and lower cost. However, similar evaluation is lacking for robotic training. The purpose of this study was to assess several criteria, such as reliability, face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a new virtual robotic surgery simulator. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from December 2009 to April 2010 using three simulators dV-Trainers(®) (MIMIC Technologies(®)) and one Da Vinci S(®) (Intuitive Surgical(®)). Seventy-five subjects, divided into five groups according to their initial surgical training, were evaluated based on five representative exercises of robotic specific skills: 3D perception, clutching, visual force feedback, EndoWrist(®) manipulation, and camera control. Analysis was extracted from (1) questionnaires (realism and interest), (2) automatically generated data from simulators, and (3) subjective scoring by two experts of depersonalized videos of similar exercises with robot. RESULTS: Face and content validity were generally considered high (77 %). Five levels of ability were clearly identified by the simulator (ANOVA; p = 0.0024). There was a strong correlation between automatic data from dV-Trainer and subjective evaluation with robot (r = 0.822). Reliability of scoring was high (r = 0.851). The most relevant criteria were time and economy of motion. The most relevant exercises were Pick and Place and Ring and Rail. CONCLUSIONS: The dV-Trainer(®) simulator proves to be a valid tool to assess basic skills of robotic surgery.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476836 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-virtual-reality-simulator-dv-trainer%c2%ae-is-a-valid-assessment-tool-for-robotic-surgical-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/recurrence-after-transanal-endoscopic-microsurgery-for-large-rectal-adenomas/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/recurrence-after-transanal-endoscopic-microsurgery-for-large-rectal-adenomas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Cassoni P, Famiglietti F, Morino M
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Cassoni P, Famiglietti F, Morino M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has revolutionized the technique and outcome of transanal surgery, becoming the standard of treatment for large sessile rectal adenomas. Nevertheless, only a few studies have evaluated the risk factors for local recurrence in order to recommend a &#8220;tailored&#8221; approach. The aim of this study was to identify predictor variables for recurrence after TEM to treat rectal adenoma. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients treated for large sessile rectal adenomas by TEM at our institution, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Age, gender, tumor diameter, distance from the anal verge, degree of dysplasia, histology, and margin involvement were investigated. RESULTS: Between January 1993 and July 2010, 293 patients with a rectal adenoma ≥3 cm underwent TEM. Postoperative morbidity rate was 7.2 % (21/293) and there was no 30-day mortality. Over a median follow-up period of 110 (range = 12-216) months, 13 patients (5.6 %) were diagnosed with local recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 10 (range = 4-33) months, with 76.9 % of recurrences detected within 12 months after TEM. At univariate analysis, tumor diameter (p = 0.007), and positive margins (p &lt; 0.001) were shown to be significant risk factors, while multivariate analysis indicated the presence of positive margins as the only independent predictor of recurrence (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: TEM provides excellent oncological outcomes in the treatment of large sessile benign rectal lesions, assuring a minimal risk of resection margin infiltration at pathology examination, which represents the only risk factor for recurrence.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476837 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/recurrence-after-transanal-endoscopic-microsurgery-for-large-rectal-adenomas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in video-assisted thyroidectomy: lessons learned from neuromonitoring.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/recurrent-laryngeal-nerve-injury-in-video-assisted-thyroidectomy-lessons-learned-from-neuromonitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/recurrent-laryngeal-nerve-injury-in-video-assisted-thyroidectomy-lessons-learned-from-neuromonitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in video-assisted thyroidectomy: lessons learned from neuromonitoring.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Dionigi G, Alesina PF, Barczynski M, Boni L, Chiang FY, Kim HY, Materazzi G, Randolph ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in video-assisted thyroidectomy: lessons learned from neuromonitoring.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Dionigi G, Alesina PF, Barczynski M, Boni L, Chiang FY, Kim HY, Materazzi G, Randolph GW, Terris DJ, Wu CW</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to assess the mechanism of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury during video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT). METHODS: The study examined 201 nerves at risk (NAR). VAT with laryngeal neuromonitoring (LNM) was outlined according to this scheme: (a) preparation of the operative space; (b) vagal nerve stimulation (V1); (c) ligature of the superior thyroid vessels; (d) visualization, stimulation (R1), and dissection of the RLN; (e) extraction of the lobe; (f) resection of the thyroid lobe; (g) final hemostasis; (h) verification of the electrical integrity of the RLN (V2, R2). The site, cause, and circumstance of nerve injury were elucidated with the application of LNM. Laryngeal nerve injuries were classified into type 1 injury (segmental) and 2 (diffuse). RESULTS: Fourteen nerves (6.9 %) experienced loss of R2 and V2 signals. 80 percent of lesions occurred in the distal 1 cm of the course of the RLN. The incidence of type 1 and 2 injuries was 71 and 29 % respectively. The mechanisms of injury were traction (70 %) and thermal (30 %). Traction lesions were created during the extraction of the lobe from the mini-incision [point (e)]. Thermal injury occurred during energy-based device use in (f) and (g) circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: RLN palsy still occurs with routine endoscopic identification of the nerve, even combined with LNM. LNM has the advantage of elucidating the mechanism of RLN injury. Traction and thermal RLN injuries are the most frequent lesions in VAT.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476838 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/recurrent-laryngeal-nerve-injury-in-video-assisted-thyroidectomy-lessons-learned-from-neuromonitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections in patients with symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-open-colorectal-resections-in-patients-with-symptomatic-stage-iv-colorectal-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-open-colorectal-resections-in-patients-with-symptomatic-stage-iv-colorectal-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections in patients with symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Giraudo G, Marano A, Morino M
        Abstract
        BACKGROUN...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections in patients with symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Giraudo G, Marano A, Morino M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection (LR) for patients with symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer compared with open resection (OR). METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months after LR or OR for metastatic colorectal cancer were included. All analyses were performed on an &#8220;intention-to-treat&#8221; basis. RESULTS: A total of 162 consecutive patients submitted to LR and 127 submitted to OR were included. In the LR group, conversion rate was 26.5 %, mostly due to locally advanced disease (88.4 %). A greater risk of conversion was observed among patients with a tumor size greater than 5 cm regardless the tumor site (P = 0.07). Early postoperative outcome was significantly better for LR group, with a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.008), earlier onset of adjuvant treatment, and similar postoperative complications (P = 0.853) and mortality rates (P = 0.958). LR for rectal cancer was associated with a higher morbidity compared with colon cancer (P = 0.058). During a median follow-up time of 72 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.622). CONCLUSIONS: LR for symptomatic metastatic CRC is safe and, compared with OR, is associated with a shorter hospital stay and with similar survival rates. Concerns remain about LR of bulky tumors and rectal cancers due to the increased risk of conversion and postoperative complications.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476839 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-open-colorectal-resections-in-patients-with-symptomatic-stage-iv-colorectal-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reply to doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2245-0: Re: Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients. (Surg Endosc. Online First).</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s00464-012-2245-0-re-bilateral-total-extraperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-has-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-unilateral-tep-population-based-analysis-of-prospective-data/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s00464-012-2245-0-re-bilateral-total-extraperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-has-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-unilateral-tep-population-based-analysis-of-prospective-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Reply to doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2245-0: Re: Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients. (Surg Endosc. Online ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Reply to doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2245-0: Re: Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients. (Surg Endosc. Online First).</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Gass M, Guller U</p>
<p>PMID: 22476840 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s00464-012-2245-0-re-bilateral-total-extraperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-has-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-unilateral-tep-population-based-analysis-of-prospective-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A sheep model for endoscopic treatment of mandible subcondylar fractures.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-sheep-model-for-endoscopic-treatment-of-mandible-subcondylar-fractures/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-sheep-model-for-endoscopic-treatment-of-mandible-subcondylar-fractures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A sheep model for endoscopic treatment of mandible subcondylar fractures.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  López-Cedrún JL, Ewart Z, Luaces-Rey R, Arenaz-Búa J, Patiño-Seijas B, Centeno A, López E, Rodriguez ED
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A sheep model for endoscopic treatment of mandible subcondylar fractures.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  López-Cedrún JL, Ewart Z, Luaces-Rey R, Arenaz-Búa J, Patiño-Seijas B, Centeno A, López E, Rodriguez ED</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Mandible subcondylar fractures may be treated via a traditional visible access incision; however, with the advances in surgical endoscopy surgeons are transitioning to a minimally invasive approach in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and external facial scarring. We sought to design a clinically applicable teaching tool in a large animal model that would allow the operator to gain experience treating mandible subcondylar fractures via an endoscopic approach. METHODS: A large animal model was developed using the Churra sheep. Subcondylar fractures were created, reduced, and internally plated in ten specimens via an extraoral, two-port endoscopic approach. Animals were monitored for surgical success during the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods. RESULTS: Mandibles were reduced and fixated successfully in each of the animals. Operative time was reduced from 70 to 40 min as the surgeons became more familiar with the surgical procedure. Each of the ten Churra sheep used in the study tolerated the surgeries without postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Capitalizing on a mandibular anatomy similar to humans, the Churra sheep successfully demonstrated utility for the extraoral, endoscopic approach in treating mandibular condyle fractures. This model offers surgeons the opportunity to gain surgical endoscopic experience before treating clinical patients.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476841 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-sheep-model-for-endoscopic-treatment-of-mandible-subcondylar-fractures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-robotic-subtotal-splenectomy-in-hereditary-spherocytosis-potential-advantages-and-limits-of-an-expensive-approach/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-robotic-subtotal-splenectomy-in-hereditary-spherocytosis-potential-advantages-and-limits-of-an-expensive-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S
        Abstract
  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy with the robotic approach in patients with hereditary spherocytosis. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive subtotal splenectomies by minimal approach in patients with hereditary spherocytosis were analyzed (10 robotic vs. 22 laparoscopic subtotal splenectomies). RESULTS: A significant difference was found for the robotic approach regarding blood loss, vascular dissection duration, and splenic remnant size. Follow-up for 4-103 months was available. CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal splenectomy seems to be a suitable candidate for robotic surgery, requiring a delicate dissection of the splenic vessels and a correct intraoperative evaluation of the splenic remnant. Robotic subtotal splenectomy is comparable to laparoscopy in terms of hospital stay and complication. The main benefits are lower blood loss rate, vascular dissection time, and a better evaluation of the splenic remnant volume.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476842 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-versus-robotic-subtotal-splenectomy-in-hereditary-spherocytosis-potential-advantages-and-limits-of-an-expensive-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No-incision (NOTES) versus single-incision (single-port) surgery for access to sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a back-to-back animal study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/no-incision-notes-versus-single-incision-single-port-surgery-for-access-to-sites-of-peritoneal-carcinomatosis-a-back-to-back-animal-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/no-incision-notes-versus-single-incision-single-port-surgery-for-access-to-sites-of-peritoneal-carcinomatosis-a-back-to-back-animal-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ladjici Y, Pocard M, Marteau P, Valleur P, Dray X</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        No-incision (NOTES) versus single-incision (single-port) surgery for access to sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a back-to-back animal study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;
        Authors:  Ladjici Y, Pocard M, Marteau P, Valleur P, Dra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>No-incision (NOTES) versus single-incision (single-port) surgery for access to sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a back-to-back animal study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr 5;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ladjici Y, Pocard M, Marteau P, Valleur P, Dray X</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiological diagnosis and evaluation of limited peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is suboptimal. Triangle laparoscopy is considered a noncarcinologic option due to the risk of tumoral spreading through the lateral ports into the abdominal wall muscles. Open surgery is therefore often needed to characterize PC. A minimally invasive approach would be progress. METHODS: We aimed to compare access rates to elective sites of PC using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with those using single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS). Sixteen acute experiments were performed in a live porcine model. Back-to-back NOTES and SPLS standardized peritoneoscopy were conducted in a cross-over design. Access rates to 11 elective sites of PC were considered as end points based on operators&#8217; consensus and necropsy verification. RESULTS: Access to the targets was successful in 89 % with NOTES and 80 % with SPLS (p = 0.27). NOTES and SPLS achieved a 100 % access rate to the diaphragmatic domes and paracolic gutters, to the splenic area, to the pelvic floor, and to the trigonal bladder (p &gt; 0.99). Access rates of NOTES versus SPLS to other elective sites of PC were the following: mesentery root (94 % vs. 0 %, p &lt; 0.001), inferior mesenteric vein origin (88 % vs. 0 %, p &lt; 0.001), inferior vena cava (88 % vs. 75 %, p = 0.85), and hepatic pedicle (8 % vs. 100 %, p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both transgastric NOTES and SPLS provided quick and easy access to most elective sites of PC, except for the mesenteric vessel root (better achieved by NOTES) and the hepatic pedicle (better achieved by SPLS). Both techniques could be improved or combined to overcome their specific drawbacks.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22476843 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/no-incision-notes-versus-single-incision-single-port-surgery-for-access-to-sites-of-peritoneal-carcinomatosis-a-back-to-back-animal-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hepatorenal reflex contributes to the induction of oliguria during pneumoperitoneum in the rat.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-hepatorenal-reflex-contributes-to-the-induction-of-oliguria-during-pneumoperitoneum-in-the-rat/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-hepatorenal-reflex-contributes-to-the-induction-of-oliguria-during-pneumoperitoneum-in-the-rat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The hepatorenal reflex contributes to the induction of oliguria during pneumoperitoneum in the rat.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 24;
        Authors:  Karplus G, Szold A, Serour F, Weinbroum AA
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Hepatic b...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The hepatorenal reflex contributes to the induction of oliguria during pneumoperitoneum in the rat.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 24;</p>
<p>Authors:  Karplus G, Szold A, Serour F, Weinbroum AA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Hepatic blood flow is known to decrease during pneumoperitoneum. Studies have shown that such changes affect kidney urinary output through the sympathetic pathway known as the hepatorenal reflex. This study investigated the potential role of the hepatorenal reflex in pneumoperitoneum-induced oliguria. The authors hypothesized that oliguria detectable during pneumoperitoneum is caused by activation of the hepatorenal reflex. METHODS: Denervation of the sympathetic nervous structure was performed in 15 rats by applying 1 ml of 90 % aqueous phenol solution circumferentially to the portal vein and vena cava area at their entrance to the liver. The same was applied to only the peritoneum in 15 nondenervated rats. After 2 weeks, the rats were divided into three subgroups (5 rats per subgroup) that were exposed respectively to carbon dioxide-induced pneumoperitoneum at 0, 10, and 15 mmHg for 2 h. Statistical analysis was performed using Student&#8217;s t test and analyses of variance. RESULTS: Denervation did not affect the preinsufflation parameters. The denervated and the nondenervated 0-mmHg subgroups presented with similar parameters. The postinsufflation mean urine output was significantly lower in the nondenervated than in the denervated 10- and 15-mmHg subgroups (p = 0.0097). The denervated rats had a final creatinine clearance 29 % lower than the preinsufflation value (p = 0.83), whereas the nondenervated animals presented a 79 % drop in creatinine clearance (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The study findings indicate that the hepatorenal reflex plays an important role in the pathophysiology of oliguria that occurs during pneumoperitoneum in the rat.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22447284 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-hepatorenal-reflex-contributes-to-the-induction-of-oliguria-during-pneumoperitoneum-in-the-rat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/safety-and-efficacy-of-new-integrated-bipolar-and-ultrasonic-scissors-compared-to-conventional-laparoscopic-5-mm-sealing-and-cutting-instruments/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/safety-and-efficacy-of-new-integrated-bipolar-and-ultrasonic-scissors-compared-to-conventional-laparoscopic-5-mm-sealing-and-cutting-instruments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 24;
        Authors:  Seehofer D, Mogl M, Boas-Knoop S, Unger J, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 24;</p>
<p>Authors:  Seehofer D, Mogl M, Boas-Knoop S, Unger J, Schirmeier A, Chopra S, Eurich D</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Hemostasis is a central issue in laparoscopic surgery. Ultrasonic scissors and bipolar clamps are commonly used, with known advantages with each technique. METHODS: The prototype of new surgical scissors, delivering ultrasonically generated frictional heat energy and bipolar heat energy simultaneously (THUNDERBEAT(®) [TB]), was compared to ultrasonic scissors (Harmonic ACE(®) [HA]) and an advanced bipolar device (LigaSure(®) [LS]) using a pig model. As safety parameters, temperature profiles after single activation and after a defined cut were determined. As efficacy parameters, seal failures and the maximum burst pressure (BP) were measured after in vivo sealing of vessels of various types and diameters (categories 2-4 and 5-7 mm). Moreover, the vertical width of the tissue seal was measured on serial histological slices of selected arteries. The cutting speed was measured during division of isolated arteries and during dissection of a defined length of compound tissue (10 cm of mesentery). Burst-pressure measurement and histological analysis were performed by investigators blinded to the used sealing device. RESULTS: Using the TB, the burst pressure in larger arteries was significantly higher (734 ± 64 mmHg) than that of the HA (453 ± 50 mmHg). No differences in the rate of seal failures were observed. The cutting speed of the TB was significantly higher than that of all other devices. Safety evaluation revealed temperatures below 100 °C in the bipolar device. The maximum temperature of the HA and the TB was significantly higher. No relevant differences were observed between the HA and the TB. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasonic and bipolar technique of the TB has the potential to surpass the dissection speed of ultrasonic devices with the sealing efficacy of bipolar clamps. However, heat production that is comparable to conventional ultrasonic scissors should be minded for clinical use.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22447285 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/safety-and-efficacy-of-new-integrated-bipolar-and-ultrasonic-scissors-compared-to-conventional-laparoscopic-5-mm-sealing-and-cutting-instruments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-novel-extra-glissonian-approach-for-totally-laparoscopic-left-hepatectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-novel-extra-glissonian-approach-for-totally-laparoscopic-left-hepatectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 24;
        Authors:  Rotellar F, Pardo F, Benito A, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Pedano N
        Abstract
        INTRODUCTION: We d...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 24;</p>
<p>Authors:  Rotellar F, Pardo F, Benito A, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Pedano N</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: We describe a novel extra-glissonian approach (EGA) for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Published techniques for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy generally involve the selective ligation of the vascular and biliary elements of the left pedicle. The laparoscopic dissection of these structures can be tedious, difficult, and dangerous. The EGA has proven useful in open surgery for major hepatectomies. We feel that this approach could be even more useful in the laparoscopic context. METHODS: We describe an extra-glissonian laparoscopic technique in which the left pedicle is isolated extraparenchymally, detaching the left hilar plate, with particular attention to preserving the branch for segment I. The left portal triad is encircled with a cotton tape and transected with an endostapler. This is performed totally extraparenchymally without damaging the surrounding parenchyma. RESULTS: This EGA technique for laparoscopic left hepatectomy follows by laparoscopy the same steps and recommendations that make the EGA safe and effective in open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The EGA for LLH can be performed as described in open surgery, therefore offering the same advantages.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22447286 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-novel-extra-glissonian-approach-for-totally-laparoscopic-left-hepatectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/factors-associated-with-adherence-to-the-recommended-postpolypectomy-surveillance-interval/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/factors-associated-with-adherence-to-the-recommended-postpolypectomy-surveillance-interval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Kim ER, Sinn DH, Kim JY, Chang DK, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Kim YH
        Abstract
        BACK...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kim ER, Sinn DH, Kim JY, Chang DK, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Kim YH</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Appropriate surveillance intervals are important to ensure that the benefits of surveillance are not offset by harm. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with nonadherence to recommended colonoscopic surveillance intervals. METHODS: The study enrolled 296 patients who underwent screening colonoscopy. The colonoscopies were performed by four endoscopists in the first or second year of fellowship. After each procedure, the endoscopists responded to a questionnaire that elicited information on the degree of concern for missed polyps (using a visual analog scale [VAS]), colonoscopic technical factors, and surveillance intervals. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients, 105 (36%) were adherent and 191 (64%) and were nonadherent to the guidelines. There were no differences in insertion time, withdrawal time, or polyp detection rate between the adherence and nonadherence groups. The endoscopy at cecal intubation was longer in the nonadherence group than in the adherence group (P = 0.013). The proportion of patients with poor bowel preparation was higher in the nonadherence group than in the adherence group (P = 0.011). The endoscopist&#8217;s concern for missed polyps was greater in the nonadherence group than in the adherence group (P &lt; 0.001). Based on multivariate analysis, only the endoscopist&#8217;s concern was an independent factor associated with adherence to guidelines (P = 0.008). Poor bowel preparation, loop formation, and colonoscopy experience were independent factors associated with a high concern for missed polyps. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to the recommended guidelines was associated with the endoscopist&#8217;s concern for missed polyps. Improving colonoscopic skills and bowel preparation may decrease nonadherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437946 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/factors-associated-with-adherence-to-the-recommended-postpolypectomy-surveillance-interval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-robotic-assisted-pancreaticoduodenectomy-a-case-matched-comparison-with-open-resection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-robotic-assisted-pancreaticoduodenectomy-a-case-matched-comparison-with-open-resection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Minima...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive procedures have expanded recently to include pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but the efficacy of a laparoscopic robotic-assisted approach has not been demonstrated. A case-matched comparison was undertaken to study outcomes between laparoscopic robotic approach (LRPD) and the conventional open counterpart (OPD). METHODS: From March 2009 through December 2010, 30 LRPD were performed by two pancreaticobiliary surgeons at the Cleveland Clinic. Thirty OPD patients operated by four pancreaticobiliary surgeons during this same period were matched by demographics, and postoperative outcomes were compared from review of a prospectively collected database. RESULTS: Mean age was 62 years for LRPD versus 61 years for OPD (p = 0.43). Mean body mass index was 24.8 versus 25.6 kg/m(2) (p = 0.49). Surgical indications included adenocarcinoma in 14 patients from each group (46%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in 4 (14%), and other in 12 (40%). There was one preoperative death in the LRPD group and none following OPD. Morbidity occurred in nine patients (30%) following LRPD versus 13 (44%) in the OPD group (p = 0.14). Intraoperative factors assessed included blood loss (485.8 vs 775 ml, p = 0.13) and operative time (476.2 vs 366.4 min, p = 0.0005). Conversion from LRPD to open occurred in three patients (12%) due to bleeding. Reoperation was performed in two patients (6%) following LRPD versus seven (24%) following OPD (p = 0.17). Length of hospital stay was 9.79 days for LRPD versus 13.26 days in the OPD group (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comparison of a novel laparoscopic robotic-assisted PD with the open PD in a case-matched fashion. Our data demonstrate a significant increase in operative time but decreased length of stay for LRPD. The favorable morbidity following LRPD makes it a reasonable surgical approach for selected patients requiring PD.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437947 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-robotic-assisted-pancreaticoduodenectomy-a-case-matched-comparison-with-open-resection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical notes: a self-designed, simple, secure, and safe six-loop intracorporeal Pringle&#8217;s maneuver for laparoscopic liver resection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/technical-notes-a-self-designed-simple-secure-and-safe-six-loop-intracorporeal-pringles-maneuver-for-laparoscopic-liver-resection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/technical-notes-a-self-designed-simple-secure-and-safe-six-loop-intracorporeal-pringles-maneuver-for-laparoscopic-liver-resection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Technical notes: a self-designed, simple, secure, and safe six-loop intracorporeal Pringle's maneuver for laparoscopic liver resection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Chao YJ, Wang CJ, Shan YS
        Abstract
        BA...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Technical notes: a self-designed, simple, secure, and safe six-loop intracorporeal Pringle&#8217;s maneuver for laparoscopic liver resection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Chao YJ, Wang CJ, Shan YS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to design a simple, secure, and safe technique of intracorporeal Pringle&#8217;s maneuver to facilitate safer laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS: A self-designed six-loop catheter was made using 20-French T-tube and 10-French nelaton urethral catheter. The cross head and stem of the T-tube were trimmed to 1 cm, respectively. The nelaton was shortened to 12-cm-long tube from the round tip, and the cut end was inserted and sutured to the stem of the T-tube. After establishment of pneumoperitoneum, the T-tube with nelaton was placed into the abdomen. The round end of the nelaton was inserted into the lesser sac and pulled through the foramen of Winslow, and the end of nelaton was then inserted into one end of the T-tube and pulled through the other end, forming a six-loop. The nelaton was pulled to occlude the hepatic inflow and temporarily fixed with 1-0 Vicryl on a curved round needle on the other end of the T-tube. The protocol of Pringle&#8217;s maneuver was 15-min clamp and 5-min release periods. The liver parenchymal transection was performed using Harmonic scalpel. RESULTS: From November 2009 to August 2011, 20 patients received laparoscopic liver resection using the six-loop Pringle&#8217;s maneuver. During operation, 17 patients were positioned supine, 2 patients in left decubitus, and 1 patient in supine followed by left decubitus position. There were 9 anatomical resections and 11 nonanatomical resections (18 patients for single lesion, 1 for two lesions, and 1 for three lesions). The average times of liver resection and Pringle&#8217;s maneuver were 33.1 and 36.2 min, respectively. Mean blood loss was 102.5 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and average hospital stay was 4.4 days. CONCLUSION: Our self-designed six-loop intracorporeal Pringle&#8217;s maneuver can facilitate safer laparoscopic liver resection.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437948 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/technical-notes-a-self-designed-simple-secure-and-safe-six-loop-intracorporeal-pringles-maneuver-for-laparoscopic-liver-resection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/development-and-evaluation-of-a-laparoscopic-common-bile-duct-exploration-simulator-and-procedural-rating-scale/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/development-and-evaluation-of-a-laparoscopic-common-bile-duct-exploration-simulator-and-procedural-rating-scale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ, Nagle AP, Rooney DM, Hungness ES
        Abstr...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ, Nagle AP, Rooney DM, Hungness ES</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is an effective, single-stage treatment for choledocholithiasis. However, LCBDE requires specific cognitive and technical skills, is infrequently performed by residents, and currently lacks suitable training and assessment modalities outside of the operating room. To address this gap in training, a simulator model for transcystic and transcholedochal LCBDE was developed and evaluated. METHODS: A procedure algorithm incorporating essential cognitive and technical steps of LCBDE was developed, along with a physical model to allow performance of a simulated procedure. Modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rating scales were developed to assess performance on the model. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the performance of novices (residents and surgeons without LCBDE experience) versus experienced subjects (surgeons with previous LCBDE experience). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing scores from the LCBDE scales to those from the standard OSATS scale. Internal consistency and interrater reliability were assessed by comparing performance scores assigned by three independent raters. RESULTS: Sixteen novices and five experienced subjects performed simulated procedures, with novices scoring lower than experienced subjects on both transcystic (20 ± 3 vs. 33 ± 2 [possible score range, 0-45], p &lt; 0.001) and transcholedochal (25 ± 8 vs. 42 ± 3 [possible score range, 0-53], p &lt; 0.001) rating scales. Scores on the rating scales correlated significantly with scores from the standard OSATS scale. Internal consistency and interrater reliability of the LCBDE rating scales were favorable. CONCLUSIONS: The LCBDE simulator is a low-cost yet realistic physical model that allows performance and evaluation of technical skills required for LCBDE. The LCBDE rating scales show evidence of construct validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and interrater reliability. Use of the LCBDE model and associated rating scales allows procedure-specific feedback for trainees and could be used to improve current training.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437949 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/development-and-evaluation-of-a-laparoscopic-common-bile-duct-exploration-simulator-and-procedural-rating-scale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/robot-assisted-total-mesorectal-excision-is-there-a-learning-curve/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/robot-assisted-total-mesorectal-excision-is-there-a-learning-curve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total mesore...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) is associated with a steep learning curve, but the learning curve for robotic TME is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for robotic TME. METHODS: Between November 2004 and April 2009, 80 patients underwent robotic TME performed by a single surgeon. The operative experience was divided into two groups: group 1 (the first 40 cases) and group 2 (the subsequent 40 cases). Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and morbidities were compared. RESULTS: The two patient populations selected did not differ statistically in age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative risk assessment, stage, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, or tumor location. The mean operative times in group 1 (310 min) and group 2 (297 min) were similar (p = 0.55), and the mean robotic TME time did not differ between the two groups (60 vs. 64 min; p = 0.65). In addition, the operative times did not improve during the course of the study. There were no differences in EBL, margin status, or number of lymph nodes harvested. Furthermore, there were no differences in conversion rate, time to resumption of diet, length of hospital stay, or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted TME may attenuate the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Further studies are necessary to establish the role of robotic surgery in minimally invasive rectal operations.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437950 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/robot-assisted-total-mesorectal-excision-is-there-a-learning-curve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flexible versus rigid single-port peritoneoscopy: a randomized controlled trial in a live porcine model followed by initial experience in human cadavers.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/flexible-versus-rigid-single-port-peritoneoscopy-a-randomized-controlled-trial-in-a-live-porcine-model-followed-by-initial-experience-in-human-cadavers/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/flexible-versus-rigid-single-port-peritoneoscopy-a-randomized-controlled-trial-in-a-live-porcine-model-followed-by-initial-experience-in-human-cadavers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Flexible versus rigid single-port peritoneoscopy: a randomized controlled trial in a live porcine model followed by initial experience in human cadavers.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Ladjici Y, Dray X, Marteau P, Valle...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Flexible versus rigid single-port peritoneoscopy: a randomized controlled trial in a live porcine model followed by initial experience in human cadavers.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ladjici Y, Dray X, Marteau P, Valleur P, Pocard M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: We compared single incision laparoscopic surgery with flexible endoscope (&#8220;flexible SILS&#8221;) and with rigid optic (&#8220;rigid SILS&#8221;) for access to 11 elective sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Back-to-back flexible and rigid SILS peritoneoscopy were performed in ten live pigs. SILS peritoneoscopy was performed using a flexible endoscope or a rigid optic, in random order, together with two rigid 5-mm laparoscopic forceps. Primary endpoint was access success rate to 11 elective sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Findings for the most favorable option were then assessed in four human cadavers. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the overall rate of access to targets was 98% with flexible SILS and 87% with rigid SILS (p &lt; 0.001). Both flexible and rigid SILS allowed a 100% access rate to diaphragmatic domes, paracolic gutters, splenic and hepatic hilum, pelvic floor, and trigonal bladder. The rates of access to other sites by flexible versus rigid SILS, respectively, were: root of the mesentery (90 vs. 50%), origin of the inferior mesenteric vein (90 vs. 50%), inferior vena cava (100 vs. 90%), and cul-de-sac of Douglas (100 vs. 50%). No complications were observed. Procedures were performed in mean time of 26 and 24 min, respectively. These findings were confirmed for flexible SILS in four human cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible SILS is superior to rigid SILS to evaluate the peritoneal cavity in a timely manner. This suggests a need for flexible instrumentation or other technical solutions to perform thorough minimally invasive surgical evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437951 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/flexible-versus-rigid-single-port-peritoneoscopy-a-randomized-controlled-trial-in-a-live-porcine-model-followed-by-initial-experience-in-human-cadavers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-of-the-efficacy-of-continuous-infusion-of-local-anesthetic-to-the-diaphragm-closure-following-laparoscopic-hiatal-hernia-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-of-the-efficacy-of-continuous-infusion-of-local-anesthetic-to-the-diaphragm-closure-following-laparoscopic-hiatal-hernia-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Bell RC, Hu...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Bell RC, Hufford RJ, Freeman KD</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia can result in significant postoperative pain requiring use of narcotics and patient dissatisfaction. A catheter-based delivery method that has demonstrated effectiveness and safety in other laparoscopic and open procedures (ON-Q, I Flow Corporation) was used to deliver pain medicine. This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure post laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. METHODS: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, qualifying patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia voluntarily consented to the study protocol. Standard techniques for routine closure of hiatal hernia repair were used. The ON-Q pain pump catheter was placed adjacent to the sutures used to repair the hiatal hernia, so that it rested between the diaphragm and the collagen patch used to reinforce the hernia repair. The pump infused either bupivacaine 0.5% or NaCl 0.9% at 2 cc/h for 5 days postoperatively. Patients kept a daily diary for pain scores, number of narcotic pain pills taken, and number of nausea pills taken. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients enrolled in the study, seven were dropped for adverse events or noncompliance; 20 were given placebo (0.9% NaCl) and 19 were given 0.5% bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed no advantage in using the ON-Q pain pump in terms of providing measurable reduction of pain or concomitant narcotic or nausea medication use. Further studies are indicated to determine alternatives for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437952 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-of-the-efficacy-of-continuous-infusion-of-local-anesthetic-to-the-diaphragm-closure-following-laparoscopic-hiatal-hernia-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The relationship between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a systematic review.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-relationship-between-percutaneous-endoscopic-gastrostomy-and-gastro-oesophageal-reflux-disease-in-children-a-systematic-review/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-relationship-between-percutaneous-endoscopic-gastrostomy-and-gastro-oesophageal-reflux-disease-in-children-a-systematic-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The relationship between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a systematic review.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Noble LJ, Dalzell AM, El-Matary W
        Abstract
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The relationship between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a systematic review.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Noble LJ, Dalzell AM, El-Matary W</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The relationship between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is widely disputed in the current literature. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the available evidence documenting the association between PEG and GERD. METHODS: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (1950 to week 2, January 2011), PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge (1898 to week 2, January, 2011), EMBASE (1980 to week 2, January 2011) and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) using the terms &#8220;gastroesophageal reflux&#8221;, &#8220;gastroesophageal disease&#8221;, &#8220;GERD&#8221;, &#8220;GERD&#8221;, &#8220;GER&#8221;, &#8220;GER&#8221; and &#8220;percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy&#8221;, &#8220;PEG&#8221;, &#8220;gastrostomy&#8221;. In addition, the reference lists of all included studies were reviewed for relevant citations. Studies examining children pre and post insertion of PEG for GERD and written in English language were included. Data extraction was performed by two authors, and the methodology and statistical analysis of each study were assessed. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this systematic review. Two reported increased incidence of GERD after PEG. However, neither was of high methodological quality. The remaining six reported no change or decreased GERD. Nonetheless, few demonstrated rigorous methodology. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence examining the effect of PEG insertion on GERD has been inconsistent and is not of high quality and therefore is unconvincing, preventing a definitive conclusion. Overall, the available literature on this topic does not demonstrate a causal effect of PEG insertion on GERD.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437953 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-relationship-between-percutaneous-endoscopic-gastrostomy-and-gastro-oesophageal-reflux-disease-in-children-a-systematic-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ergonomic and geometric tricks of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) by using conventional laparoscopic instruments.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/ergonomic-and-geometric-tricks-of-laparoendoscopic-single-site-surgery-less-by-using-conventional-laparoscopic-instruments/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/ergonomic-and-geometric-tricks-of-laparoendoscopic-single-site-surgery-less-by-using-conventional-laparoscopic-instruments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Ergonomic and geometric tricks of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) by using conventional laparoscopic instruments.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Tsai YC, Lin VC, Chung SD, Ho CH, Jaw FS, Tai HC
        Abstra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Ergonomic and geometric tricks of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) by using conventional laparoscopic instruments.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Tsai YC, Lin VC, Chung SD, Ho CH, Jaw FS, Tai HC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and safety of performing laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) with conventional laparoscopic instruments. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our data from 175 patients who underwent various urological LESS procedures via the same ergonomic and geometric principles between 2008 and 2011. LESS procedures performed included adrenalectomy (N = 23), radical nephrectomy (N = 5), radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection (N = 5), varicocelectomy (N = 12), nephropexy (N = 4), lumbar sympathectomy (N = 4), orchiectomy for intra-abdominal testis (N = 1), pyeloureterostomy (N = 1), dismembered pyeloplasty (N = 1), and adult inguinal hernia mesh repair (N = 119). RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully without the use of ancillary ports or articulating instruments except two cases that required laparoscopic conversion. The mean patient age was 48.9 years. Mean operative time was 99.7 min, mean estimated blood loss was 17.3 ml, and mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. There were no intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION: According to our ergonomic and geometric principles, use of conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe in LESS procedures.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437954 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/ergonomic-and-geometric-tricks-of-laparoendoscopic-single-site-surgery-less-by-using-conventional-laparoscopic-instruments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/evidence-to-support-the-use-of-laparoscopic-over-open-appendicectomy-for-obese-individuals-a-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/evidence-to-support-the-use-of-laparoscopic-over-open-appendicectomy-for-obese-individuals-a-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Woodham BL, Cox MR, Eslick GD
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Woodham BL, Cox MR, Eslick GD</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in the obese population has been controversial. A recent SAGES guideline and a Cochrane Review have suggested a benefit for LA over the open approach but did not provide supporting data. This study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the LA with open surgery in the obese population to provide a quantitative estimate of the relative benefits. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the online databases identified seven retrospective and prospective randomized studies that contained sufficient data on obese patients. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The LA group contained more females (43 vs. 32 %, p &lt; 0.001), had fewer perforations (18 vs. 23 %; p &lt; 0.001), and fewer overall complications (OR: 0.49; 95 % CI: 0.37-0.63), including fewer wound infections (OR: 0.34; 95 % CI: 0.18-0.66). There was no difference in the intra-abdominal abscess rate between the groups (OR: 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.29-3.37). The LA group had a shorter length of stay (2.46 vs. 3.63 days; p &lt; 0.001) but a longer operation time (96 vs. 78 min, p &lt; 0.001). There was no heterogeneity between the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of the current published data establishes the laparoscopic approach to appendicectomy as the preferred technique for the obese population, delivering a 50 % reduction in morbidity, with a 66 % reduction in wound infections and a significantly shorter inpatient hospital stay without increasing the intra-abdominal abscess rate.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437955 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/evidence-to-support-the-use-of-laparoscopic-over-open-appendicectomy-for-obese-individuals-a-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reply to: doi:10.1007/s0046-4-010-1485-0: Re: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: &quot;narrow pelvis&quot; is not a contraindication (Surg Endosc 2011 Jan;25:1907-1912) : What factors should be considered in the preoperative planning of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s0046-4-010-1485-0-re-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-the-difficulty-of-laparoscopic-anterior-resection-for-rectal-cancer-narrow-pelvis-is-not-a-contraindication/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s0046-4-010-1485-0-re-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-the-difficulty-of-laparoscopic-anterior-resection-for-rectal-cancer-narrow-pelvis-is-not-a-contraindication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Reply to: doi:10.1007/s0046-4-010-1485-0: Re: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication (Surg Endosc 2011 Jan;25:1907-1912) : What factors s...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Reply to: doi:10.1007/s0046-4-010-1485-0: Re: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: &#8220;narrow pelvis&#8221; is not a contraindication (Surg Endosc 2011 Jan;25:1907-1912) : What factors should be considered in the preoperative planning of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Sakai Y</p>
<p>PMID: 22437956 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/reply-to-doi10-1007s0046-4-010-1485-0-re-evaluation-of-factors-affecting-the-difficulty-of-laparoscopic-anterior-resection-for-rectal-cancer-narrow-pelvis-is-not-a-contraindication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Totally laparoscopic strategies for the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/totally-laparoscopic-strategies-for-the-management-of-colorectal-cancer-with-synchronous-liver-metastasis/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/totally-laparoscopic-strategies-for-the-management-of-colorectal-cancer-with-synchronous-liver-metastasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Totally laparoscopic strategies for the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, Sanjay P, Henderson NA, Tait IS
        Abstract
        IN...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Totally laparoscopic strategies for the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, Sanjay P, Henderson NA, Tait IS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is an accepted treatment for colorectal cancer and liver metastases, but there is no consensus for its use in the management of synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate totally laparoscopic strategies in the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. METHODS: Patients presenting to Ninewells Hospital between July 2007 and August 2010, with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum with synchronous liver metastases were considered. Patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic liver and colon cancer resection, a staged laparoscopic resection of SCRLM and colon cancer, or simultaneous colon resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of SCRLM. Primary endpoints were in-hospital morbidity and mortality, total hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, and resection margin status. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients presented with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Thirteen patients underwent a simultaneous laparoscopic liver and colon resection (median operating time, 370 (range, 190-540) min; median hospital stay, 7 (range, 3-54) days), seven patients had a staged laparoscopic resection of SCRLM and primary colon cancer (median operating time, 530 (range, 360-980) min; median hospital stay 14, (range, 6-51) days), and eight patients underwent laparoscopic colon resection and RFA of SCRLM (median operating time, 310 (range, 240-425) min; median hospital stay, 8 (range, 6-13) days). There were no conversions to an open procedure. Overall in-hospital morbidity and mortality was 28 and 0 % respectively. An R0 resection margin was achieved in 91 % of the resection group. At a median follow-up of 26 (range, 18-55) months, 19 (90 %) patients remain disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: Totally laparoscopic strategies for the radical treatment of stage IV colorectal cancer are feasible with low morbidity and favorable outcomes. A laparoscopic approach for the simultaneous management of SCRLM and primary colon cancer is associated with reduced surgical access trauma, postoperative morbidity, and hospital stay with no compromise in short-term oncological outcome.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437957 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/totally-laparoscopic-strategies-for-the-management-of-colorectal-cancer-with-synchronous-liver-metastasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/intraoperative-cholangiography-in-the-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-era-why-are-we-still-debating/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/intraoperative-cholangiography-in-the-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-era-why-are-we-still-debating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Ausania F, Holmes LR, Ausania F, Iype S, Ricci P, White SA
        Abstract
        Laparo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ausania F, Holmes LR, Ausania F, Iype S, Ricci P, White SA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now one of the most frequently performed abdominal surgical procedures in the world. The most common major complication is bile duct injury, which can have catastrophic repercussions for patients and it has been suggested that intraoperative cholangiography may reduce the rate of bile duct injury. Whether this procedure should be performed routinely is still an active subject of debate. We discuss the available evidence and likely implications for the future.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437958 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/intraoperative-cholangiography-in-the-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-era-why-are-we-still-debating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/re-bilateral-total-extraperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-has-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-unilateral-tep-population-based-analysis-of-prospective-data-of-6505-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/re-bilateral-total-extraperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-has-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-unilateral-tep-population-based-analysis-of-prospective-data-of-6505-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Re: Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Köckerli...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Re: Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Köckerling F, Jacob DA</p>
<p>PMID: 22437959 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/re-bilateral-total-extraperitoneal-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-has-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-unilateral-tep-population-based-analysis-of-prospective-data-of-6505-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic surgeons&#8217; preferences for inguinal hernia repair: TEP, TAPP, or OPEN.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-surgeons-preferences-for-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-tapp-or-open/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-surgeons-preferences-for-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-tapp-or-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Endoscopic surgeons' preferences for inguinal hernia repair: TEP, TAPP, or OPEN.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;
        Authors:  Morales-Conde S, Socas M, Fingerhut A
        Abstract
        INTRODUCTION: The use of endoscopic inguinal ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Endoscopic surgeons&#8217; preferences for inguinal hernia repair: TEP, TAPP, or OPEN.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 22;</p>
<p>Authors:  Morales-Conde S, Socas M, Fingerhut A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: The use of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair has slowly increased in the past years, but the indications have remained vague. Some surgeons perform a tailored approach depending on patient or hernia characteristics, whereas others perform the same approach and technique for all hernias. METHODS: Based on these principles, a survey of 19 questions was conducted during the 18th Congress of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons, which took place in Geneva, Switzerland, in 2010, to determine surgeons&#8217; preference depending on the hernia and the patient. RESULTS: All surgeons who attended the session (N = 100) responded to all questions. Eighty two percent of surgeons preferred a tailored approach, whereas 18 % used the same technique in all cases. Endoscopic techniques are used more frequently than the open approach in bilateral (7 vs. 93 %) and recurrent hernias (19 vs. 81 %), whereas in primary unilateral hernias all three techniques were used with almost similar frequency (32 % open, 39 % TAPP vs. 29 % TEP). TAPP was used more frequently than TEP, and even those surgeons who are expert in TEP preferred to perform a TAPP in difficult hernias, such as in obese patients and large scrotal hernias. Based on the age of patients, the open approach is preferred in patients younger than 18 years and older than 70 years, whereas the endoscopic approach is preferred in young active males and females, with a trend to use TAPP (44 %) more frequently than TEP (40 %) in females. Surgeons tended to use the open (vs. endoscopic) approach in patients with hematologic disorders (58 % open vs. 42 % endoscopic), previous laparotomy (59 % open vs. 41 % endoscopic) or emergency surgery (66 vs. 33 % in incarcerated hernias and 74 vs. 26 % in strangulated hernia). CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that most surgeons who perform an endoscopic approach for inguinal hernia as the first option are convinced that not all hernias are good indications for this approach. On the other hand, most surgeons think that it is better to be able to offer patients an endoscopic technique or an open approach depending on the case.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22437960 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-surgeons-preferences-for-inguinal-hernia-repair-tep-tapp-or-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstracts of the 19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Torino, Italy. June 15-18, 2011.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-june-15-18-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-june-15-18-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Abstracts of the 19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Torino, Italy. June 15-18, 2011.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S1-176
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22439140 [PubMed - index...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Abstracts of the 19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Torino, Italy. June 15-18, 2011.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S1-176</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22439140 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-june-15-18-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstracts of EURO-NOTES 2011, 5th Joint European Notes Workshop. Frankfurt am Main, Germany. September 22-24, 2011.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-euro-notes-2011-5th-joint-european-notes-workshop-frankfurt-am-main-germany-september-22-24-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-euro-notes-2011-5th-joint-european-notes-workshop-frankfurt-am-main-germany-september-22-24-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Abstracts of EURO-NOTES 2011, 5th Joint European Notes Workshop. Frankfurt am Main, Germany. September 22-24, 2011.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S177-9
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22439141 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Abstracts of EURO-NOTES 2011, 5th Joint European Notes Workshop. Frankfurt am Main, Germany. September 22-24, 2011.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S177-9</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22439141 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-euro-notes-2011-5th-joint-european-notes-workshop-frankfurt-am-main-germany-september-22-24-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstracts of the Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALS). Cardiff, United Kingdom. November 17-18, 2011.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-association-of-laparoscopic-surgeons-of-great-britain-and-ireland-als-cardiff-united-kingdom-november-17-18-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-association-of-laparoscopic-surgeons-of-great-britain-and-ireland-als-cardiff-united-kingdom-november-17-18-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Abstracts of the Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALS). Cardiff, United Kingdom. November 17-18, 2011.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S180-5
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22439142 [PubMed - index...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Abstracts of the Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALS). Cardiff, United Kingdom. November 17-18, 2011.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S180-5</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22439142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-association-of-laparoscopic-surgeons-of-great-britain-and-ireland-als-cardiff-united-kingdom-november-17-18-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstracts of the 2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). San Diego, California, USA. March 7-10, 2012.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-march-7-10-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-march-7-10-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Abstracts of the 2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). San Diego, California, USA. March 7-10, 2012.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S186-451
        Authors: 
        P...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Abstracts of the 2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). San Diego, California, USA. March 7-10, 2012.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:S186-451</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22439143 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/abstracts-of-the-2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-march-7-10-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/staple-line-reinforcement-during-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-using-three-different-techniques-a-randomized-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/staple-line-reinforcement-during-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-using-three-different-techniques-a-randomized-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 23;
        Authors:  Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, D'Ugo S, Benavoli D, Gaspari AL
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 23;</p>
<p>Authors:  Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, D&#8217;Ugo S, Benavoli D, Gaspari AL</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of postoperative complications. Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated. The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively and randomly three different techniques of SLR during LSG. METHODS: From April 2010 to April 2011, patients submitted to LSG were randomly selected for the following three different techniques of SLR: oversewing (group A); buttressed transection with a polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (group B); and staple-line roofing with a gelatin fibrin matrix (group C). Primary endpoints were reinforcement operative time, incidence of postoperative staple-line bleeding, and leaks. Operative time was calculated as follows: oversewing time in group A; positioning of polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate over the stapler in group B; and roofing of the entire staple line in group C. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study (82 women and 38 men). Mean age was 44.6 ± 9.2 (range, 28-64) years. Mean preoperative body mass index was 47.2 ± 6.6 (range, 40-66) kg/m². Mean time for SLR was longer in group A (14.2 ± 4.2 (range, 8-18) minutes) compared with group B (2.4 ± 1.8 (range, 1-4) minutes) and group C (4.4 ± 1.6 (range, 3-6) minutes; P &lt; 0.01). Four major complications were observed (3.3 %): one leak and one bleeding in group A; one bleeding in group B; and one leak in group C, with no significant differences between the groups. No mortality was observed. CONCLUSIONS: SLR with either polyglycolide acid with trimethylene carbonate or gelatin fibrin matrix is faster compared with oversewing. No significant differences were observed regarding postoperative staple-line complications.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22441975 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/staple-line-reinforcement-during-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-using-three-different-techniques-a-randomized-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The feasibility of short-stay laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-feasibility-of-short-stay-laparoscopic-appendectomy-for-acute-appendicitis-a-prospective-cohort-study/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-feasibility-of-short-stay-laparoscopic-appendectomy-for-acute-appendicitis-a-prospective-cohort-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The feasibility of short-stay laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 23;
        Authors:  Sabbagh C, Brehant O, Dupont H, Browet F, Pequignot A, Regimbeau JM
        Abstr...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The feasibility of short-stay laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 23;</p>
<p>Authors:  Sabbagh C, Brehant O, Dupont H, Browet F, Pequignot A, Regimbeau JM</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Short-stay laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis (AA) has not yet been validated. This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the hospital length of stay (LOS) after laparoscopic appendectomy for AA and to determine predictive factors for successful short-stay surgery (LOS &lt;24 h). METHODS: Between January and December 2010, all consecutive adults admitted for AA were prospectively treated with LOS &lt;24 h as a patient management goal. The proportion of patients with LOS &lt;24 h was analyzed for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and for the population eligible for short-stay surgery. Predictive factors for LOS &lt;24 h were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 123 patients included in this study, 71.5 % (88/123) were eligible for short-stay surgery. The proportion of LOS &lt;24 h cases was 52 % (64/123) in the ITT population and 72.7 % (64/88) in the eligible population. LOS &lt;12 h was achieved in 17.8 % (22/123) in the ITT patients and 25 % (22/88) of the eligible patients. The main cause of unexpected readmission was postoperative pain (n = 10, 8.1 %). Age &lt;23 years and a serum C-reactive protein level &lt;18 mg/l had a positive predictive value of 100 % for LOS &lt;24 h. Of the eligible patients, 27.2 % (24/88) were subject to unplanned overnight admissions and postsurgery readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: LOS &lt;24 h was feasible for 52 % of patients admitted for AA and for 72.7 % of the patients eligible for short-term surgery. Low age and a low preoperative serum CRP level are predictive factors for the feasibility of short-stay laparoscopic appendectomy for AA.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22441976 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-feasibility-of-short-stay-laparoscopic-appendectomy-for-acute-appendicitis-a-prospective-cohort-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotically-assisted-laparoscopy-for-paraaortic-lymphadenectomy-technical-description-and-results-of-an-initial-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotically-assisted-laparoscopy-for-paraaortic-lymphadenectomy-technical-description-and-results-of-an-initial-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;
        Authors:  Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, Bannier M, Jauffret C, Canno...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, Bannier M, Jauffret C, Cannone F, Houvenaeghel G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of robotically assisted laparoscopy paraaortic lymphadenectomy (PAL), isolated or combined with another procedure using different surgical approaches. METHODS: From February 2007 to December 2010, 53 patients underwent paraaortic lymphadenectomy up to the left renal vein. We used three different approaches with three different positions for the robot in relation to the surgical procedure (isolated transperitoneal PAL, isolated extraperitoneal PAL, or transperitoneal PAL combined with another procedure). Thirty-nine patients underwent isolated lomboaortic lymphadenectomy and 14 a combined procedure. Information concerning installation time, operative time, peri- and postoperative complications, blood loss, lymph node count, and conversion rate was recorded. RESULTS: For the whole population, mean installation time was 33 ± 18 min, mean operative time was 197 ± 81 min, and mean hospital stay was 3.9 ± 2.8 days. We observed 15.1% lymph node involvement at definitive pathology. Between isolated trans- and extraperitoneal PAL, only body mass index (BMI, 27.4 versus 22 kg/m(2)) was significantly different. No difference was observed concerning mean number of lymph nodes or hospital stay. We observed statistical difference between combined and isolated PAL concerning mean operative time (256 versus 160 min), mean number of lymph nodes (7.8 versus 14.6), and hospital stay (5.9 versus 2.9 days). CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic robotic-assisted PAL is a safe and feasible procedure, lymph node staging seems to be better if the procedure is isolated. In case of combined procedures, the surgical approach should be modified regarding patient BMI and the associated procedure, to increase lymph node count.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22407151 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotically-assisted-laparoscopy-for-paraaortic-lymphadenectomy-technical-description-and-results-of-an-initial-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/surgical-management-of-acute-cholecystitis-results-of-a-2-year-prospective-multicenter-survey-in-belgium/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/surgical-management-of-acute-cholecystitis-results-of-a-2-year-prospective-multicenter-survey-in-belgium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;
        Authors:  Navez B, Ungureanu F, Michiels M, Claeys D, Muysoms F, Hubert C, Vanderveken M, De...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;</p>
<p>Authors:  Navez B, Ungureanu F, Michiels M, Claeys D, Muysoms F, Hubert C, Vanderveken M, Detry O, Detroz B, Closset J, Devos B, Kint M, Navez J, Zech F, Gigot JF,  </p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered nowadays as the standard management of acute cholecystitis (AC). However, results from multicentric studies in the general surgical community are still lacking. METHODS: A prospective multicenter survey of surgical management of AC patients was conducted over a 2-year period in Belgium. Operative features and patients&#8217; clinical outcome were recorded. The impact of independent predictive factors on the choice of surgical approach, the risk of conversion, and the occurrence of postoperative complications was studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-three surgeons consecutively and anonymously included 1,089 patients in this prospective study. A primary open approach was chosen in 74 patients (6.8%), whereas a laparoscopic approach was the first option in 1,015 patients (93.2%). Independent predictive factors for a primary open approach were previous history of upper abdominal surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.13, p &lt; 0.001], patient age greater than 70 years (OR 2.41, p &lt; 0.05), surgeon with more than 10 years&#8217; experience (OR 2.08, p = 0.005), and gangrenous cholecystitis (OR 1.71, p &lt; 0.05). In the laparoscopy group, 116 patients (11.4%) required conversion to laparotomy. Overall, 38 patients (3.5%) presented biliary complications and 49 had other local complications (4.5%). Incidence of bile duct injury was 1.2% in the whole series, 2.7% in the open group, and 1.1% in the laparoscopy group. Sixty patients had general complications (5.5%). The overall mortality rate was 0.8%. All patients who died were in poor general condition [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III or IV]. CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently considered as the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, an open approach is still a valid option in more advanced disease. However, overall mortality and incidence of bile duct injury remain high.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22407152 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/surgical-management-of-acute-cholecystitis-results-of-a-2-year-prospective-multicenter-survey-in-belgium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Combined transurethral approach with Versapoint(®) and laparoscopic treatment in the management of bladder endometriosis: technique and 12 months follow-up.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/combined-transurethral-approach-with-versapoint%c2%ae-and-laparoscopic-treatment-in-the-management-of-bladder-endometriosis-technique-and-12%c2%a0months-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/combined-transurethral-approach-with-versapoint%c2%ae-and-laparoscopic-treatment-in-the-management-of-bladder-endometriosis-technique-and-12%c2%a0months-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Combined transurethral approach with Versapoint(®) and laparoscopic treatment in the management of bladder endometriosis: technique and 12 months follow-up.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;
        Authors:  Litta P, Saccardi C, D'Agostin...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Combined transurethral approach with Versapoint(®) and laparoscopic treatment in the management of bladder endometriosis: technique and 12 months follow-up.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;</p>
<p>Authors:  Litta P, Saccardi C, D&#8217;Agostino G, Florio P, De Zorzi L, Bianco MD</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: When endometriosis infiltrates more than 5 mm beneath the peritoneum it is called deeply infiltrating endometriosis and may involve the bladder. Only 1-2% of women with endometriosis have urinary involvement, mainly in the bladder. Resectoscopic transurethral resection alone is no longer recommended because of the surgical risks and recurrence. Usually surgeons prefer a laparotomy or laparoscopic approach depending on nodule localization and personal skill. We describe a new combined transurethral approach with Versapoint(®) and laparoscopic technique in the management of bladder endometriosis and the 12-month follow-up. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 12 women affected by symptomatic bladder endometriosis at the University Hospital of Padova. We utilized a transurethral approach using a 5.2-mm endoscope with a 0.6-mm-diameter bipolar electrode (Gynecare Versapoint(®)). We delimited just the edges of the lesion via cystoscopy, penetrating transmurally at 3 or 9 o&#8217;clock without trespassing into the bladder peritoneum. Then, starting from the lateral bladder hole, we excised the lesion by laparoscopy with Harmonic ACE(®). The bladder hole was repaired with a continuous 3-0 monofilament two-layer suture. RESULTS: Operating time ranged from 115 to 167 min and mean blood loss ranged from 10 to 200 ml. No conversion to laparotomy and no intraoperative complications occurred. No dysuria or hematuria were present at follow-up. There was one case of persistent suprapubic pelvic pain at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A combined transurethral approach with Versapoint(®) and laparoscopic treatment is a safe and easy technique for the management of bladder endometriosis, with low risks and good resolution of symptoms.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22407153 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/combined-transurethral-approach-with-versapoint%c2%ae-and-laparoscopic-treatment-in-the-management-of-bladder-endometriosis-technique-and-12%c2%a0months-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A novel approach for the treatment of pelvic abscess: transrectal endoscopic drainage facilitated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery access.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-novel-approach-for-the-treatment-of-pelvic-abscess-transrectal-endoscopic-drainage-facilitated-by-transanal-endoscopic-microsurgery-access/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-novel-approach-for-the-treatment-of-pelvic-abscess-transrectal-endoscopic-drainage-facilitated-by-transanal-endoscopic-microsurgery-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A novel approach for the treatment of pelvic abscess: transrectal endoscopic drainage facilitated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery access.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;
        Authors:  Martins BC, Marques CF, Nahas CS, Hondo FY, Po...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A novel approach for the treatment of pelvic abscess: transrectal endoscopic drainage facilitated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery access.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 10;</p>
<p>Authors:  Martins BC, Marques CF, Nahas CS, Hondo FY, Pollara W, Nahas SC, Ribeiro Junior U, Cecconello I, Maluf-Filho F</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Postoperative pelvic abscesses in patients submitted to colorectal surgery are challenging. The surgical approach may be too risky, and image-guided drainage often is difficult due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis. This article describes novel access for drainage of a pelvic collection using a minimally invasive natural orifice approach. METHODS: A 37 year-old man presented with sepsis due to a pelvic abscess during the second postoperative week after a Hartmann procedure due to perforated rectal cancer. Percutaneous drainage was determined by computed tomography to be unsuccessful, and another operation was considered to be hazardous. Because the pelvic fluid was very close to the rectal stump, transrectal drainage was planned. The rectal stump was opened using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) instruments. The endoscope was advanced through the TEM working channel and the rectal stump opening, accessing the abdominal cavity and pelvic collection. RESULTS: The pelvic collection was endoscopically drained and the local cavity washed with saline through the scope channel. A Foley catheter was placed in the rectal stump. The patient&#8217;s recovery after the procedure was successful, without the need for further intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal endoscopic drainage may be an option for selected cases of pelvic fluid collection in patients submitted to Hartmann&#8217;s procedure. The technique allows not only fluid drainage but also visualization of the local cavity, cleavage of multiloculated abscesses, and saline irrigation if necessary. The use of TEM instrumentation allows safe access to the peritoneal cavity.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22407154 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-novel-approach-for-the-treatment-of-pelvic-abscess-transrectal-endoscopic-drainage-facilitated-by-transanal-endoscopic-microsurgery-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy for pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis impairs adrenomedullary but not noradrenergic sympathetic function.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/bilateral-thoracoscopic-splanchnicectomy-for-pain-in-patients-with-chronic-pancreatitis-impairs-adrenomedullary-but-not-noradrenergic-sympathetic-function/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/bilateral-thoracoscopic-splanchnicectomy-for-pain-in-patients-with-chronic-pancreatitis-impairs-adrenomedullary-but-not-noradrenergic-sympathetic-function/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy for pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis impairs adrenomedullary but not noradrenergic sympathetic function.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;
        Authors:  Buscher HC, Lenders JW, Wilder-Smi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy for pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis impairs adrenomedullary but not noradrenergic sympathetic function.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Buscher HC, Lenders JW, Wilder-Smith OH, Sweep CG, van Goor H</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (BTS) is a well-known technique to alleviate intractable pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. BTS not only disrupts afferent fibers from the pancreas that mediate pain but also postganglionic sympathetic fibers, which originate in segments T5-T12 and which innervate the vasculature of the liver, pancreas, and the adrenal gland. The purpose of this study was to assess whether and how BTS affects sympathetic noradrenergic and adrenomedullary function in patients with chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Sixteen patients with chronic pancreatitis for at least 1 year underwent autonomic function testing before and 6 weeks after BTS for intractable pain. Testing was performed during supine rest and during sympathetic stimulation when standing. RESULTS: Supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly lower post-BTS compared with pre-BTS (P = 0.001). One patient showed orthostatic hypotension after BTS. Baseline plasma norepinephrine levels and plasma norepinephrine responses to sympathetic activation during standing were not reduced by BTS. In contrast, supine plasma epinephrine levels and responses during standing were significantly reduced (P &lt; 0.001). Parasympathetic activity was unaffected by BTS as shown by unaltered Valsalva ratio, I-E difference, and ΔHRmax. CONCLUSIONS: BTS for pain relief in patients with chronic pancreatitis reduced adrenomedullary function, due to disruption of the efferent sympathetic fibers to the adrenal gland. BTS did not affect noradrenergic sympathetic activity, although blood pressure was lower after the sympathectomy.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22395951 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/bilateral-thoracoscopic-splanchnicectomy-for-pain-in-patients-with-chronic-pancreatitis-impairs-adrenomedullary-but-not-noradrenergic-sympathetic-function/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/thoracoscopic-esophagectomy-in-the-prone-position/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/thoracoscopic-esophagectomy-in-the-prone-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;
        Authors:  Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophageal ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophageal surgery has arisen in an attempt to reduce the significant complications associated with esophagectomy. Despite proposed technical and physiological advantages, the prone position technique has not been widely adopted. This article reviews the current status of prone thoracoscopic esophagectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all published clinical studies related to prone esophagectomy. Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched using the keywords &#8220;prone,&#8221; &#8220;thoracoscopic,&#8221; and &#8220;esophagectomy&#8221; to identify articles published between January 1994 and September 2010. A critical review of these studies is given, and where appropriate the technique is compared to the more traditional minimally invasive technique utilising the left lateral decubitus position. RESULTS: Twelve articles reporting the outcomes following prone thoracoscopic oesophagectomy were tabulated. These studies were all non-randomised single-centre prospective or retrospective studies of which four compared the technique to traditional minimally invasive surgery. Although prone esophagectomy is demonstrated as being both feasible and safe, there is no convincing evidence that it is superior to other forms of esophageal surgery. Most authors comment that the prone position is associated with superior surgical ergonomics and theoretically offers a number of physiological benefits. CONCLUSION: The ideal approach within minimally invasive esophageal surgery continues to be a subject of debate since no single method has produced outstanding results. Further clinical studies are required to see whether ergonomic advantages of the prone position can be translated into improved patient outcomes.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22395952 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/thoracoscopic-esophagectomy-in-the-prone-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transgastric small bowel resection with the new multitasking platform EndoSAMURAI™ for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/transgastric-small-bowel-resection-with-the-new-multitasking-platform-endosamurai%e2%84%a2-for-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/transgastric-small-bowel-resection-with-the-new-multitasking-platform-endosamurai%e2%84%a2-for-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Transgastric small bowel resection with the new multitasking platform EndoSAMURAI™ for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;
        Authors:  Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W
        Abstract
        BACK...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Transgastric small bowel resection with the new multitasking platform EndoSAMURAI™ for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Recently, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery has been introduced using flexible endoscopic technology. Traditional endoscopes lack several capabilities that are needed to perform complex surgical procedures safely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the new multitasking platform for transgastric small bowel resection including dissection of the mesentery and suturing an anastomosis. METHODS: A new prototype of endoscopic multifunctional platform, EndoSAMURAI™ (ES), was tested. A standardized in vitro setting was established with segments of small bowel and an anastomosis was sutured with the device and compared with that by stapler (ST) and hand-sewn (HS). Leak pressure was measured. In addition, the system was tested in an experimental in vivo situation by performing a transgastric small bowel segmental resection under general anesthesia. RESULTS: Median time to perform an anastomosis in the bench test was 41 min; median leak pressure for the anastomosis by ES was 14 mmHg, by ST 25 mmHg, and HS 15 mmHg. For the in vivo study, the median total procedure time was 110 min and leak pressure 53 mmHg. These results show that the end-to-end small bowel anastomosis can be sutured sufficiently. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that with a multifunctional platform such as the EndoSAMURAI™, the majority of complex surgical tasks can be performed if technically independently moving instruments can be used via an ergonomic workstation interface that allows for laparoscopy-like maneuvers by the operator. Even with the shortcomings of the prototype, it was possible to perform an anastomosis of the small bowel of acceptable quality within a reasonable time.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22395953 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/transgastric-small-bowel-resection-with-the-new-multitasking-platform-endosamurai%e2%84%a2-for-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The use of biodegradable (SX-ELLA) oesophageal stents to treat dysphagia due to benign and malignant oesophageal disease.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-use-of-biodegradable-sx-ella-oesophageal-stents-to-treat-dysphagia-due-to-benign-and-malignant-oesophageal-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-use-of-biodegradable-sx-ella-oesophageal-stents-to-treat-dysphagia-due-to-benign-and-malignant-oesophageal-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        The use of biodegradable (SX-ELLA) oesophageal stents to treat dysphagia due to benign and malignant oesophageal disease.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;
        Authors:  Griffiths EA, Gregory CJ, Pursnani KG, Ward JB, Stockwell RC
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>The use of biodegradable (SX-ELLA) oesophageal stents to treat dysphagia due to benign and malignant oesophageal disease.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Griffiths EA, Gregory CJ, Pursnani KG, Ward JB, Stockwell RC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Biodegradable (BD) oesophageal stents have been available commercially only since 2008 and previous published research is limited. Our aim was to review the use of BD stents to treat dysphagia in benign or malignant oesophageal strictures. METHODS: Patients were identified from a prospective interventional radiological database. BD stents were inserted radiologically under fluoroscopic control. RESULTS: Between July 2008 and February 2011, 25 attempts at placing SX-ELLA biodegradable oesophageal stents were made in 17 males and five females, with a median age of 69 (range = 54-80) years. Two patients required more than one BD stent. Indications were benign strictures (n = 7) and oesophageal cancer (n = 17). One attempt was unsuccessful for a technical success rate of 96% with no immediate complications. Clinical success rate was 76%. Median dysphagia score before stent insertion was 3 (range = 2-4) compared to 2 (range = 0-3) after stent insertion (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: BD stents provide good dysphagia relief for the life time of the stent. They may help avoid the use of feeding tubes in patients having radical chemoradiotherapy or awaiting oesophagectomy. They do not require removal or interfere with radiotherapy planning via imaging. However, the reintervention rate is high after the stent dissolves.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22395954 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/the-use-of-biodegradable-sx-ella-oesophageal-stents-to-treat-dysphagia-due-to-benign-and-malignant-oesophageal-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation obviates the need for pyloroplasty at esophagectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-pyloric-balloon-dilatation-obviates-the-need-for-pyloroplasty-at-esophagectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-pyloric-balloon-dilatation-obviates-the-need-for-pyloroplasty-at-esophagectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation obviates the need for pyloroplasty at esophagectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 8;
        Authors:  Swanson EW, Swanson SJ, Swanson RS
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Because the rate of acquire...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation obviates the need for pyloroplasty at esophagectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 8;</p>
<p>Authors:  Swanson EW, Swanson SJ, Swanson RS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Because the rate of acquired pyloric stenosis (APS) from truncal vagotomy is 15%, many surgeons perform pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy at the time of esophagectomy. Endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation (EPBD) is another method to manage APS. This study evaluated a cohort treated with preoperative EPBD. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients treated with preoperative EPBD and esophagectomy for cancer from 2002 to 2009 at Brigham and Women&#8217;s Hospital, a tertiary care center. Outcome measures included need for subsequent surgery for gastric outlet obstruction, rate of pyloric stenosis noted on postoperative endoscopy, and complications. RESULTS: Upon review of the series, 25 patients (80% male; median age, 63 [range 47-81] years) had outpatient preoperative EPBD and esophagectomies 1-2 weeks later and were included in the study. None had pyloroplasties or pyloromyotomies at the time of esophagectomy. Selected patients had postoperative endoscopy. Of the 25 patients, 20 had transhiatal esophagectomies, 3 had thoracoabdominal esophagectomies, and 2 had VATS 3-hole esophagectomies. Median follow-up time was 22 (range, 1-84) months. There were no complications from EPBD. There were no postoperative deaths. No patient needed a second operation for gastric outlet obstruction. All patients had postoperative barium swallows (BaS) or endoscopy or both. Only one patient (4%) required one postoperative EPBD to dilate a 16-mm pylorus. Three others had delayed gastric emptying on BaS with endoscopy showing each pylorus was wide open. Their symptoms improved with time. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, preoperative EPBD in all patients combined with postoperative EPBD in one patient obviated the need for pyloroplasty. This approach merits further study in a larger cohort, particularly to determine whether preoperative EPBD is necessary or if only selected postoperative EPBD is sufficient.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22398960 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/endoscopic-pyloric-balloon-dilatation-obviates-the-need-for-pyloroplasty-at-esophagectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon&#8217;s selection needed?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-conversion-is-the-surgeons-selection-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-conversion-is-the-surgeons-selection-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 8;
        Authors:  Donkervoort SC, Dijksman LM, de Nes LC, Versluis PG, Derksen J, Gerhards MF
        Abstract
        BA...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon&#8217;s selection needed?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 8;</p>
<p>Authors:  Donkervoort SC, Dijksman LM, de Nes LC, Versluis PG, Derksen J, Gerhards MF</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Risk factors for conversion in cholecystectomy may be of clinical value. This study aimed to investigate whether a set of risk factors, including the surgeon&#8217;s specialization, can be used for the development of a preoperative strategy to optimize conversion outcome. METHODS: The data for all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a single institution between January 2004 and December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Factors predictive for conversion were identified, and a preoperative strategy model was deduced. RESULTS: Of the 1,126 patients analyzed, 106 (9%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an emergency setting. Delayed surgery was performed for 63 (46%) of 138 patients (12%) with acute cholecystitis. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was achieved for 161 of the patients (14%). Risk factors predictive of conversion (for 65 patients) were male gender [odds ratio (OR), 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-3.9; p = 0.004], age older than 65 years (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.8; p = 0.002), body mass index (BMI) exceeding 25 kg/m(2) (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1; p &lt; 0.001), history of complicated biliary disease (HCBD) (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.2-9.8; p = &lt; 0.001), and surgery by a non-gastrointestinal (non-GI) surgeon (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.2-10.6; p &lt; 0.001). The conversion rate for patients with a history of no complications who had two or more risk factors (gender, age, BMI &gt; 25) and for patients with a HCBD who had one or more risk factors was significantly higher if the surgery was performed by non-GI rather than GI surgeons. CONCLUSION: Male gender, age older than 65 years, BMI exceeding 25 kg/m(2), HCBD, and surgery by a non-GI surgeon are predictive for conversion. A preoperative triage for surgeon selection based on risk factors and a HCBD is proposed to optimize conversion outcome.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22398961 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-conversion-is-the-surgeons-selection-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk factors for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions: emphasis on perforation type.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/risk-factors-for-perforations-associated-with-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-in-gastric-lesions-emphasis-on-perforation-type/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/risk-factors-for-perforations-associated-with-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-in-gastric-lesions-emphasis-on-perforation-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Risk factors for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions: emphasis on perforation type.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 8;
        Authors:  Yoo JH, Shin SJ, Lee KM, Choi JM, Wi JO, Kim DH, Lim SG, Hwan...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Risk factors for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions: emphasis on perforation type.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar 8;</p>
<p>Authors:  Yoo JH, Shin SJ, Lee KM, Choi JM, Wi JO, Kim DH, Lim SG, Hwang JC, Cheong JY, Yoo BM, Lee KJ, Kim JH, Cho SW</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of larger gastric neoplasms. However, the procedure is associated with a high incidence of perforation. Perforations during ESD are divided into macro- and microperforations. Although both types of perforations could cause widespread tissue injury and secondary sepsis, very little is known concerning the risk factors for perforations according to the type of perforation. Thus, this study was performed to evaluate the risk factors for macro-, micro-, and all perforations (both) during ESD. METHODS: 823 gastric lesions (gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer) in 729 patients treated by ESD were enrolled, and their records were reviewed retrospectively. Risk factors were evaluated, focusing on age, sex, gastric neoplasm-related factors (12 locations, resected size, gross type of lesions, presence of ulceration, presence of fibrosis, pathologic diagnosis, and depth of invasion), and ESD procedure-related factors (type of knife, immediate bleeding during ESD, en bloc resection, procedure time, and the number of ESD cases experienced by the endoscopist). RESULTS: Of the 823 gastric lesions, the rates of all perforation, macroperforation, and microperforation were 9.6%, 7.5%, and 2.1%, respectively. Risk factors for all perforations on multivariate analysis were location of tumor in upper portion, presence of fibrosis, and long procedure time (&gt;2 h). Risk factors for macroperforations were the same as all perforations. Risk factors for microperforations on multivariate analysis were old age (≥81 years), depth of invasion (muscularis mucosa), and long procedure time (&gt;2 h). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for perforations during ESD could differ according to the type of perforation. Therefore, although macroperforation did not develop during ESD, it would be necessary to consider the possibility of microperforation in case of old age, long procedure time, and (deep) depth of invasion.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22398962 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/risk-factors-for-perforations-associated-with-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-in-gastric-lesions-emphasis-on-perforation-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/transvaginal-cholecystectomy-without-laparoscopic-support-using-prototype-flexible-endoscopic-instruments-in-a-porcine-model/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/transvaginal-cholecystectomy-without-laparoscopic-support-using-prototype-flexible-endoscopic-instruments-in-a-porcine-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 24;
        Authors:  Satgunam S, Miedema B, Whang S, Thaler K
        Abstract
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 24;</p>
<p>Authors:  Satgunam S, Miedema B, Whang S, Thaler K</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Transvaginal cholecystectomy with laparoscopic assistance has been performed safely in humans. The next goal was to develop a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy without laparoscopic instruments using one flexible endoscope and flexible accessories. The aim of the study was to test the feasibility of the procedure in a survival porcine model. METHODS: Cholecystectomies were attempted in five 88-130-lb. pigs with a planned 2-week survival. Prototype flexible instruments (NOTES Toolbox, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) were used to aid in access, dissection, and removal of the gallbladder via the transvaginal route. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy could be completed without abdominal incision using prototype instruments in four out of five pigs. The cystic duct could be exposed with a flexible hook knife and clips applied. The steerable trocar improved stability and the precision of the dissection. The critical view was established in all five pigs. Dissection of the gallbladder off the liver bed was imprecise resulting in gallbladder perforation in all pigs and liver hemorrhage in two. At necropsy, all clips on the cystic duct were secure and no bile leak, bowel injury, or adhesions were present. CONCLUSIONS: NOTES cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support is feasible but challenging using prototype flexible endoscopic devices. A prototype clip applier was effective in controlling the cystic duct. Further improvements in instrument design to ensure precision and safety are needed before flexible devices should be used for pure NOTES procedures in humans.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22361735 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/transvaginal-cholecystectomy-without-laparoscopic-support-using-prototype-flexible-endoscopic-instruments-in-a-porcine-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/transvaginal-cholecystectomy-without-laparoscopic-support-using-prototype-flexible-endoscopic-instruments-in-a-porcine-model/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/transvaginal-cholecystectomy-without-laparoscopic-support-using-prototype-flexible-endoscopic-instruments-in-a-porcine-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 24;
        Authors:  Satgunam S, Miedema B, Whang S, Thaler K
        Abstract
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Transvaginal cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support using prototype flexible endoscopic instruments in a porcine model.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 24;</p>
<p>Authors:  Satgunam S, Miedema B, Whang S, Thaler K</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Transvaginal cholecystectomy with laparoscopic assistance has been performed safely in humans. The next goal was to develop a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy without laparoscopic instruments using one flexible endoscope and flexible accessories. The aim of the study was to test the feasibility of the procedure in a survival porcine model. METHODS: Cholecystectomies were attempted in five 88-130-lb. pigs with a planned 2-week survival. Prototype flexible instruments (NOTES Toolbox, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) were used to aid in access, dissection, and removal of the gallbladder via the transvaginal route. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy could be completed without abdominal incision using prototype instruments in four out of five pigs. The cystic duct could be exposed with a flexible hook knife and clips applied. The steerable trocar improved stability and the precision of the dissection. The critical view was established in all five pigs. Dissection of the gallbladder off the liver bed was imprecise resulting in gallbladder perforation in all pigs and liver hemorrhage in two. At necropsy, all clips on the cystic duct were secure and no bile leak, bowel injury, or adhesions were present. CONCLUSIONS: NOTES cholecystectomy without laparoscopic support is feasible but challenging using prototype flexible endoscopic devices. A prototype clip applier was effective in controlling the cystic duct. Further improvements in instrument design to ensure precision and safety are needed before flexible devices should be used for pure NOTES procedures in humans.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22361735 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/transvaginal-cholecystectomy-without-laparoscopic-support-using-prototype-flexible-endoscopic-instruments-in-a-porcine-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-long-term-prognosis-of-laparoscopy-assisted-gastrectomy-and-conventional-open-gastrectomy-with-special-reference-to-d2-lymph-node-dissection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-long-term-prognosis-of-laparoscopy-assisted-gastrectomy-and-conventional-open-gastrectomy-with-special-reference-to-d2-lymph-node-dissection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 4;
        Authors:  Sato H, Shimada M, Kurita N, Iwata...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 4;</p>
<p>Authors:  Sato H, Shimada M, Kurita N, Iwata T, Nishioka M, Morimoto S, Yoshikawa K, Miyatani T, Goto M, Kashihara H, Takasu C</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) is becoming widely used for early gastric cancer. However, how the curability and long-term prognosis of LAG and open gastrectomy (OG) for early and advanced gastric cancer compare remains unclear. This study assessed short- and long-term outcomes after LAG with lymph node dissection in early and advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 332 patients who underwent LAG or OG for early and advanced gastric cancer from January 2001 through December 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. The mean operating time, estimated mean blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, and survival rates were compared between LAG and OG for early and advanced gastric cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 47.6% (158/332) of patients underwent LAG; D1, D1+ lymph node dissection was carried out in 77.2%, with D2 dissection in 22.8%. Only one patient required conversion to OG. Comparing LAG and OG with D1, D1+ lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer (EGC), mean operating time was significantly longer, estimated mean blood loss was significantly smaller, and the average number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly greater with LAG. The rate of specific postoperative morbidity was 17.2% for LAG patients and 25.0% for OG patients, with no postoperative mortality. Survival and recurrence rates were not significantly different. Comparing LAG and OG with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), mean operating time was significantly longer and estimated mean blood loss was significantly smaller with LAG, while the average number of retrieved lymph nodes, specific postoperative morbidity and mortality, and survival and recurrence rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: LAG with D1, D1+ lymph node dissection for EGC is safe and equivalent to open gastrectomy in curability. Moreover, LAG with D2 lymph node dissection for AGC is comparable to OG with D2 lymph node dissection with regard to short- and long-term results.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22311300 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/comparison-of-long-term-prognosis-of-laparoscopy-assisted-gastrectomy-and-conventional-open-gastrectomy-with-special-reference-to-d2-lymph-node-dissection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotic-liver-resection-technique-and-results-of-30-consecutive-procedures/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotic-liver-resection-technique-and-results-of-30-consecutive-procedures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 4;
        Authors:  Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Choi JS, Lee WJ
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 4;</p>
<p>Authors:  Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Choi JS, Lee WJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery can enhance a surgeon&#8217;s laparoscopic skills through a magnified three-dimensional view and instruments with seven degrees of freedom compared to conventional laparoscopy. METHODS: This study reviewed a single surgeon&#8217;s experience of robotic liver resections in 30 consecutive patients, focusing on major hepatectomy. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.4 years and 14 were male. There were 21 malignant tumors and 9 benign lesions. There were 6 right hepatectomies, 14 left hepatectomies, 4 left lateral sectionectomies, 2 segmentectomies, and 4 wedge resections. The average operating time for the right and left hepatectomies was 724 min (range 648-812) and 518 min (range 315-763), respectively. The average estimated blood loss in the right and left hepatectomies was 629 ml (range 100-1500) and 328 ml (range 150-900), respectively. Four patients (14.8%) received perioperative transfusion. There were two conversions to open surgery (one right hepatectomy and one left hepatectomy). The overall complication rate was 43.3% (grade I, 5; grade II, 2; grade III, 6; grade IV, 0) and 40% in 20 patients who underwent major hepatectomy. Among the six (20.0%) grade III complications, a liver resection-related complication (bile leakage) occurred in two patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 11.7 days (range 5-46). There was no recurrence in the 13 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during the median follow-up of 11 months (range 5-29). CONCLUSIONS: From our experience, robotic liver resection seems to be a feasible and safe procedure, even for major hepatectomy. Robotic surgery can be considered a new advanced option for minimally invasive liver surgery.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22311301 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotic-liver-resection-technique-and-results-of-30-consecutive-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotic-transaxillary-endocrine-surgery-a-comparison-with-conventional-open-technique/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotic-transaxillary-endocrine-surgery-a-comparison-with-conventional-open-technique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 7;
        Authors:  Foley CS, Agcaoglu O, Siperstein AE, Berber E
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Robotic transaxilla...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Foley CS, Agcaoglu O, Siperstein AE, Berber E</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Robotic transaxillary (RT) endocrine surgery may improve cosmetic outcomes. We report our initial experience in RT thyroid and parathyroid surgery and the associated learning curve, and compare early surgical outcomes to those of open thyroidectomy (OT) and focal parathyroidectomy (FP). METHODS: A prospective database review identified patients who had undergone RT endocrine surgery. A case-matched group who underwent OT or FP was also identified. Demographics, histopathology, operative outcomes, and follow-up data were collected. Groups were compared using Student&#8217;s t test and the χ(2) test. RESULTS: Fifteen RT procedures were performed: 11 RT thyroidectomies (6 total, 5 lobectomies) and 4 RT parathyroidectomies (2 focal, 2 unilateral), representing 5.9% and 2.2% of thyroidectomies and parathyroidectomies performed. The OT group contained 16 patients (13 totals, 3 lobectomies). The FP group contained 12 patients. There was no significant difference in age, gender, BMI, pathology, or complications between the groups. Mean operating time was significantly longer in the RT group (232 vs. 109 min, P = 0.0002) as was mean incision length (6 vs. 3.6 cm, P &lt; 0.0001). No RT procedures were converted and no major complications occurred. Operating time decreased significantly over consecutive cases demonstrating a learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: RT thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy can be performed safely by specialist endocrine surgeons, early in their learning curve, without an increased complication rate, albeit with significantly longer operating times.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22311302 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/robotic-transaxillary-endocrine-surgery-a-comparison-with-conventional-open-technique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimally invasive liver surgery for metastases from colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome and prognostic factors.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-liver-surgery-for-metastases-from-colorectal-cancer-oncologic-outcome-and-prognostic-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-liver-surgery-for-metastases-from-colorectal-cancer-oncologic-outcome-and-prognostic-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Minimally invasive liver surgery for metastases from colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome and prognostic factors.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 7;
        Authors:  Topal B, Tiek J, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Van Cutsem E, Roskams T, Prenen H
      ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Minimally invasive liver surgery for metastases from colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome and prognostic factors.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Topal B, Tiek J, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Van Cutsem E, Roskams T, Prenen H</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Few reports exist on long-term survival after minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). No data are available assessing prognostic factors in the era of current modern treatment strategies. METHODS: Between October 2002 and December 2008, 274 consecutive patients were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Open liver surgery (OLS) was performed in 193 patients for a total of 437 metastases, and MILS was performed in 81 patients for 176 metastases. Systemic chemotherapy was administered preoperatively in 173 and postoperatively in 174 patients. The impact of 23 potential prognostic factors on disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: Postoperative complications were observed in 54 patients after OLS and in 11 after MILS (p = 0.016). The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 9 days after OLS and 5 days after MILS (p &lt; 0.0001). For the entire patient population, the 5 year DFS and OS rates were 29.9 and 59.5%, respectively. No differences in survival between patients treated with MILS and OLS were observed (p = 0.63). In univariable analyses, the number of liver metastases and the overall Fong&#8217;s clinical risk score (CRS) were the only two variables that predicted DFS (p ≤ 0.0035) and OS (p ≤ 0.0005). In multivariable analyses, the total CRS was the only independent predictor of both DFS (p = 0.0002) and OS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The long-term oncologic outcome of surgically treated patients with CRLM is determined by the Fong&#8217;s CRS. Although MILS does not influence long-term survival, it has a beneficial impact on the immediate postoperative clinical outcome.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22311303 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/minimally-invasive-liver-surgery-for-metastases-from-colorectal-cancer-oncologic-outcome-and-prognostic-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/lightweight-versus-heavyweight-mesh-in-laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-a-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/lightweight-versus-heavyweight-mesh-in-laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-a-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 7;
        Authors:  Currie A, Andrew H, Tonsi A, Hurley PR, Taribagil S
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Reinforc...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 7;</p>
<p>Authors:  Currie A, Andrew H, Tonsi A, Hurley PR, Taribagil S</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Reinforcement of inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh is standard practice but can cause considerable pain and stiffness around the groin and affect physical functioning. This has led to various types of mesh being engineered, with a growing interest in lighter-weight mesh. Minimally invasive approaches have also significantly reduced postoperative recovery from inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes after laparoscopic inguinal repair using new lightweight or traditional heavyweight mesh in published randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings, and reference lists were searched for controlled trials of heavyweight versus lightweight mesh for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias. The primary outcomes were recurrence and chronic pain. Secondary outcomes were visual analogue pain score at 7 days postoperatively, seroma formation, and time to return to work. Risk differences were calculated for categorical outcomes and standardised mean differences for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Eight trials were included in the analysis of 1,667 hernias in 1,592 patients. Mean study follow-up was between 2 and 60 months. There was no effect on recurrence [pooled analysis risk difference 0.00 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01), p = 0.86] or chronic pain [pooled analysis risk difference -0.02 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.00); p = 0.1]. Lightweight and heavyweight mesh repair had similar outcomes with regard to postoperative pain, seroma development, and time to return to work. CONCLUSION: Both mesh options appear to result in similar long- and short-term postoperative outcomes. Further long-term analysis may guide surgeon selection of mesh weight for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22311304 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/lightweight-versus-heavyweight-mesh-in-laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-a-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-comprehensive-review-of-telementoring-applications-in-laparoscopic-general-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-comprehensive-review-of-telementoring-applications-in-laparoscopic-general-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 15;
        Authors:  Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Franzen J, Bollmann S, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA
        Abstract
  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 15;</p>
<p>Authors:  Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Franzen J, Bollmann S, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Incorporation of advanced laparoscopic procedures in the practice of institutions without respective experience is a significant impediment in the dissemination of minimally invasive techniques. On-site mentoring programs carry several cost-related and practical constraints. Telementoring has emerged as a practical and cost-effective alternative mentoring tool. The present study aimed to review the pertinent literature on telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery. METHODS: A systematic review using the Medline database was performed. Articles reporting on clinical experience with telementoring applications in general surgery were included. Variations in methodology, study design, and operative procedures precluded cumulative outcome evaluation. Instead, a critical appraisal of current evidence was undertaken. RESULTS: Seventy-five articles were identified in the primary search, and ten studies were considered eligible. No randomized studies comparing on-site mentoring with telementoring were identified. The included studies reported on a total of 96 laparoscopic telementored procedures: 50 cholecystectomies, 23 colorectal resections, 7 fundoplications, 9 adrenalectomies, 6 hernia repairs, and 2 splenectomies. Completion of remotely assisted procedures was feasible in the vast majority of cases, whereas technical difficulties included video and audio latency with low transfer rates (&lt;128 kbps) and inadequate guidance regarding the correct plane for dissection. CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports the feasibility and safety of telementoring programs in general surgery. Their clinical effectiveness as teaching alternatives to traditional mentoring programs remains to be further evaluated.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350150 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/a-comprehensive-review-of-telementoring-applications-in-laparoscopic-general-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/staple-versus-fibrin-glue-fixation-in-laparoscopic-total-extraperitoneal-repair-of-inguinal-hernia-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/staple-versus-fibrin-glue-fixation-in-laparoscopic-total-extraperitoneal-repair-of-inguinal-hernia-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Kaul A, Hutfless S, Le H, Hamed SA, Tymitz K, Nguy...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kaul A, Hutfless S, Le H, Hamed SA, Tymitz K, Nguyen H, Marohn MR</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Fixation of mesh is typically performed to minimize risk of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Mesh fixation with staples has been implicated as a cause of chronic inguinal pain. Our study aim is to compare mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia and compare outcomes for hernia recurrence and chronic inguinal pain. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: PubMed was searched through December 2010 by use of specific search terms. Inclusion criteria were laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair inguinal hernia repair, and comparison of both mesh fibrin glue fixation and mesh staple fixation. Primary outcomes were inguinal hernia recurrence and chronic inguinal pain. Secondary outcomes were operative time, seroma formation, hospital stay, and time to return to normal activity. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated assuming random-effects models. RESULTS: Four studies were included in the review. A total of 662 repairs were included, of which 394 were mesh fixed by staples or tacks, versus 268 with mesh fixed by fibrin glue. There was no difference in inguinal hernia recurrence with fixation of mesh by staples/tacks versus fibrin glue [OR 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-7.63]. Chronic inguinal pain (at 3 months) incidence was significantly higher with staple/tack fixation (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.62-6.49). There was no significant difference in operative time, seroma formation, hospital stay, or time to return to normal activities. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis does not show an advantage of staple fixation of mesh over fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Because fibrin glue mesh fixation with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair achieves similar hernia recurrence rates compared with staple/tack fixation, but decreased incidence of chronic inguinal pain, it may be the preferred technique.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350225 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/staple-versus-fibrin-glue-fixation-in-laparoscopic-total-extraperitoneal-repair-of-inguinal-hernia-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/proficiency-based-training-for-robotic-surgery-construct-validity-workload-and-expert-levels-for-nine-inanimate-exercises/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/proficiency-based-training-for-robotic-surgery-construct-validity-workload-and-expert-levels-for-nine-inanimate-exercises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: We previously developed nine inanimate training exercises as part of a comprehensive, proficiency-based robotic training curriculum that addressed 23 unique skills identified via task deconstruction of robotic operations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate construct validity, workload, and expert levels for the nine exercises. METHODS: Expert robotic surgeons (n = 8, fellows and faculty) and novice trainees (n = 4, medical students) each performed three to five consecutive repetitions of nine previously reported exercises (five FLS models with or without modifications and four custom-made models). Each task was scored for time and accuracy using modified FLS metrics; task scores were normalized to a previously established (preliminary) proficiency level and a composite score equaled the sum of the nine normalized task scores. Questionnaires were administered regarding prior experience. After each exercise, participants completed a validated NASA-TLX Workload Scale to rate the mental, physical, temporal, performance, effort, and frustration levels of each task. RESULTS: Experts had performed 119 (range = 15-600) robotic operations; novices had observed ≤1 robotic operation. For all nine tasks and the composite score, experts achieved significantly better performance than novices (932 ± 67 vs. 618 ± 111, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). No significant differences in workload between experts and novices were detected (32.9 ± 3.5 vs. 32.0 ± 9.1, respectively; n.s.). Importantly, frustration ratings were relatively low for both groups (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 1.6, n.s.). The mean performance of the eight experts was deemed suitable as a revised proficiency level for each task. CONCLUSION: Using objective performance metrics, all nine exercises demonstrated construct validity. Workload was similar between experts and novices and frustration was low for both groups. These data suggest that the nine structured exercises are suitable for proficiency-based robotic training.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350226 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/proficiency-based-training-for-robotic-surgery-construct-validity-workload-and-expert-levels-for-nine-inanimate-exercises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer produces oncologic outcomes similar to those for open resection.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-gastrectomy-for-patients-with-advanced-gastric-cancer-produces-oncologic-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-open-resection/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-gastrectomy-for-patients-with-advanced-gastric-cancer-produces-oncologic-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-open-resection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer produces oncologic outcomes similar to those for open resection.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Maclellan SJ, Mackay HJ, Ringash J, Jacks L, Kassam Z, Co...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer produces oncologic outcomes similar to those for open resection.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Maclellan SJ, Mackay HJ, Ringash J, Jacks L, Kassam Z, Conrad T, Khalili I, Okrainec A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has gained acceptance as treatment for early gastric cancer. However, its role for advanced gastric cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in the management of advanced gastric cancer for patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This study reviewed consecutive patients treated with gastric cancer resection and adjuvant chemoradiation (45 Gy/25 with 5-fluorouracil [FU]-based chemotherapy), at a quaternary care comprehensive cancer center between 1 Jan 2000 and 30 Nov 2009. Of 203 patients, 21 were treated with laparoscopic gastrectomy. These patients were compared with patients who had open surgery and evaluated for overall survival, relapse-free survival, and site of first disease recurrence. RESULTS: The 21 patients in the laparoscopic group had a median age of 61.3 years (range, 28.2-76.6 years) and a median follow-up period of 21.3 months (range, 6.7-50.4 months). The majority of the patients (71%) were men. Most of these patients had tumor node metastasis (TNM) v6 stage 2 (33%) or 3 (52%) disease as classified by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). The demographic characteristics of the laparoscopic and open groups were similar. The incidence of recurrence was 38.1% (8/21) in the laparoscopic group and 36.8% (67/182) in the open group. In the laparoscopic group, the site of first recurrence was distant in three patients, peritoneal in four patients, and mixed in one patient (locoregional and distant). The recurrence patterns did not differ significantly between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. In the open group, recurrence was distant in 26 patients, peritoneal in 12 patients, and locoregional in 15 patients. At presentation, 14 patients showed a mixed pattern. The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 58% (range, 50-66%), and the difference between the two groups by Gray&#8217;s test was not significant (P = 0.32). The 3-year overall survival rate was 65.9% (range, 58-73%) and did not differ significantly between the two groups in the univariate (P = 0.92) or multivariate (P = 0.54) analysis. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that laparoscopic gastrectomy is an oncologically safe procedure for advanced gastric cancer with outcomes similar to those for open resection.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350227 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-gastrectomy-for-patients-with-advanced-gastric-cancer-produces-oncologic-outcomes-similar-to-those-for-open-resection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy demonstrations.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-during-live-endoscopy-demonstrations/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-during-live-endoscopy-demonstrations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy demonstrations.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, Treeprasertsuk S, Kongkam P, Khor CJ, Kullavanijaya P
        Abstr...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy demonstrations.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, Treeprasertsuk S, Kongkam P, Khor CJ, Kullavanijaya P</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: A number of factors may result in lower than expected success rates for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed by overseas experts during live demonstrations (LDs). Stratifying the degree of ERCP difficulty may help in the assessment of procedure outcomes, but no prior reports have done so. This study aimed to compare the success rate and complications of ERCP between procedures performed in live demonstrations and for matched control subjects. METHODS: From 2004 to 2011, a total of 82 patients who underwent ERCP during live demonstrations at the Endoscopy Unit of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were reviewed. The control for each patient was a patient admitted to the same ERCP unit with matched indications at the time closest to the demonstration course who had matching gender and techniques in therapeutic interventions during ERCP. The success rates and complications between the two groups were compared based on the grading scale for the degree of difficulty according to Cotton and colleagues. RESULTS: For standard ERCP cases (levels 1-2), the success rate, complication rate, and duration of the procedure (DOP) did not differ significantly. In contrast, the success rate for complex ERCPs (levels 3-4) performed during LD was significantly lower (73% vs. 90%; P = 0.006). The complication rates and DOP were not significantly different (P = 0.31 and 0.23, respectively). The overall success rate was significantly lower for LD procedures than for control procedures (81% vs. 91%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the standard ERCP performed during LD was associated with success and complication rates similar to those for the control subjects. Complex ERCP cases were, however, associated with lower success rates than those for the control subjects. A high proportion of complex ERCP cases during live demonstration can influence the overall success rate of ERCPs performed by overseas experts.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350228 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-during-live-endoscopy-demonstrations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on regulation of diabetes type 2 in morbidly obese patients.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/impact-of-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-on-regulation-of-diabetes-type-2-in-morbidly-obese-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/impact-of-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-on-regulation-of-diabetes-type-2-in-morbidly-obese-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on regulation of diabetes type 2 in morbidly obese patients.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Proczko-Markuszewska M, Stefaniak T, Kaska L, Kobiela J, Sledziński Z
        Abstract
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on regulation of diabetes type 2 in morbidly obese patients.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Proczko-Markuszewska M, Stefaniak T, Kaska L, Kobiela J, Sledziński Z</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The idea of surgery as treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was established in the US and was based on observation of patients after bariatric surgery. Resolution of T2DM is observed within a few weeks after surgery, in some cases even during hospitalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on diabetes in morbidly obese patients. METHODS: We present 73 patients with T2DM who underwent laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) to treat morbid obesity. In the group of 73 obese patients (mean BMI = 42.3), there were 41 females and 32 males. RESULTS: Regression of T2DM was observed in 51 patients (69.8%) while hospitalized. In addition, 14 patients&#8217; (19.1%) glycemia and HBA1c stabilized within 12 weeks after surgery (total regression rate of 88.9%). CONCLUSION: The ultimate evaluation of this method of treating T2DM is still lacking and requires several years of meticulous clinical studies. Despite that, considering the high cost of life-long conservative therapy of T2DM and its complications and the severe impact T2DM has on quality of life, surgical metabolic intervention may become the most reasonable solution in many cases.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350229 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/impact-of-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-on-regulation-of-diabetes-type-2-in-morbidly-obese-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nanoscale iodized oil emulsion: a useful tracer for pretreatment sentinel node detection using CT lymphography in a normal canine gastric model.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/nanoscale-iodized-oil-emulsion-a-useful-tracer-for-pretreatment-sentinel-node-detection-using-ct-lymphography-in-a-normal-canine-gastric-model/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/nanoscale-iodized-oil-emulsion-a-useful-tracer-for-pretreatment-sentinel-node-detection-using-ct-lymphography-in-a-normal-canine-gastric-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Nanoscale iodized oil emulsion: a useful tracer for pretreatment sentinel node detection using CT lymphography in a normal canine gastric model.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Lim JS, Choi J, Song J, Chung YE, Lim SJ, Le...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Nanoscale iodized oil emulsion: a useful tracer for pretreatment sentinel node detection using CT lymphography in a normal canine gastric model.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Lim JS, Choi J, Song J, Chung YE, Lim SJ, Lee SK, Hyung WJ</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Pretreatment identification of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in gastric cancer patients may have great advantages for minimally invasive treatment. No reliable method for the detection of SLNs during the pretreatment period in gastric cancer has been established. The aim of this study was to determine whether computed tomographic (CT) lymphography using nanoscale iodized oil emulsion via endoscopic submucosal injection can visualize LNs. METHODS: Five dogs underwent CT lymphography after endoscopic submucosal injection of 2 ml of a nanoscale iodized oil emulsion. CT images were taken before and 30, 90, and 210 min after contrast injection. Intraoperative SLN detection was performed using endoscopically injected indocyanine green lymphography for comparison. RESULTS: Computed tomographic lymphography with nanoscale iodized oil emulsion enabled the visualization of 19 enhanced LNs (mean = 3.8/dog, range = 3-6) with a 100% SLN detection rate. The locations of the SLNs were the lesser curvature (n = 7), greater curvature (n = 1), infrapyloric (n = 3), and left gastric (n = 8) areas. Contrast enhancement of SLNs continuously increased and peaked after 210 min at 142.4 ± 42.3 HU. No green LNs were visualized in the three locations that were detected by CT lymphography. However, no additional LNs were visualized using the dye method. The concordance rate based on the LNs between the SLNs on CT lymphography and the green LNs using the ICG method was 84% (16/19), whereas the concordance rate of the stations identified by CT lymphography and the dye method was 78.6% (11/14). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomographic lymphography using nanoscale iodized oil emulsion is a promising tool for preoperative SLN detection for early gastric cancer if the biological safety of the nanoscale iodized oil emulsion can be established.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350230 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/nanoscale-iodized-oil-emulsion-a-useful-tracer-for-pretreatment-sentinel-node-detection-using-ct-lymphography-in-a-normal-canine-gastric-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/is-expert-peer-review-obsolete-a-model-suggests-that-post-publication-reader-review-may-exceed-the-accuracy-of-traditional-peer-review/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/is-expert-peer-review-obsolete-a-model-suggests-that-post-publication-reader-review-may-exceed-the-accuracy-of-traditional-peer-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Herron DM
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: The p...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Herron DM</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The peer review process is the gold standard by which academic manuscripts are vetted for publication. However, some investigators have raised concerns regarding its unopposed supremacy, including lack of expediency, susceptibility to editorial bias and statistical limitation due to the small number of reviewers used. Post-publication review-in which the article is assessed by the general readership of the journal instead of a small group of appointed reviewers-could potentially supplement or replace the peer-review process. In this study, we created a computer model to compare the traditional peer-review process to that of post-publication reader review. METHODS: We created a mathematical model of the manuscript review process. A hypothetical manuscript was randomly assigned a &#8220;true value&#8221; representing its intrinsic quality. We modeled a group of three expert peer reviewers and compared it to modeled groups of 10, 20, 50, or 100 reader-reviewers. Reader-reviewers were assumed to be less skillful at reviewing and were thus modeled to be only ¼ as accurate as expert reviewers. Percentage of correct assessments was calculated for each group. RESULTS: 400,000 hypothetical manuscripts were modeled. The accuracy of the reader-reviewer group was inferior to the expert reviewer group in the 10-reviewer trial (93.24% correct vs. 97.67%, p &lt; 0.0001) and the 20-reviewer trial (95.50% correct, p &lt; 0.0001). However, the reader-reviewer group surpassed the expert reviewer group in accuracy when 50 or 100 reader-reviewers were used (97.92 and 99.20% respectively, p &lt; 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a mathematical model of the peer review process, the accuracy of public reader-reviewers can surpass that of a small group of expert reviewers if the group of public reviewers is of sufficient size. Further study will be required to determine whether the mathematical assumptions of this model are valid in actual use.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350231 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/is-expert-peer-review-obsolete-a-model-suggests-that-post-publication-reader-review-may-exceed-the-accuracy-of-traditional-peer-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Major Complications.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/open-versus-laparoscopic-pyloromyotomy-for-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-focusing-on-major-complications/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/open-versus-laparoscopic-pyloromyotomy-for-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-focusing-on-major-complications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Major Complications.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Ubbink DT, He...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Major Complications.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Ubbink DT, Heij HA</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate about whether laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP) or open pyloromyotomy (OP) is the best option for treating hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS). The aim of this study was to compare the results of both surgical strategies by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature. METHODS: A systematic search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing OP and LP was conducted. Studies were reviewed independently for quality, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and outcomes. Primary outcome was major postoperative complications (i.e., incomplete pyloromyotomy, perforation, and need for reoperation). Secondary outcomes were time to full feed, postoperative hospital stay, and any other postoperative complications. RESULTS: Four RCTs with a total of 502 patients (OP 255, LP 247) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this review. These trials showed an absolute incidence of major postoperative complications of 4.9% in the LP group. Meta-analysis showed that LP did not lead to significantly more major postoperative complications (ARR 3%, 95% CI -3 to 8%) than OP. The mean difference in time to full feed was significant (2.27 h, 95% CI -4.26 to -0.29 h) and the mean difference in postoperative hospital stay tended to be shorter (2.41 h, 95% CI -6.10 to 1.28 h), both in favor of LP. CONCLUSION: So far, the major postoperative complication rate after LP for HPS is not substantially higher than after OP. Because time to full feed and postoperative hospital stay are at best a few hours shorter after LP than after OP, the laparoscopic technique might be acknowledged as the standard of care if the major postoperative complication rate is low. Hence, this laparoscopic procedure should preferably be performed in centers with pediatric surgeons with expertise in this procedure.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350232 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/open-versus-laparoscopic-pyloromyotomy-for-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-focusing-on-major-complications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative efficacy and safety of vessel sealing: an experimental study on carotid arteries of the pig.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/postoperative-efficacy-and-safety-of-vessel-sealing-an-experimental-study-on-carotid-arteries-of-the-pig/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/postoperative-efficacy-and-safety-of-vessel-sealing-an-experimental-study-on-carotid-arteries-of-the-pig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Postoperative efficacy and safety of vessel sealing: an experimental study on carotid arteries of the pig.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Berdah SV, Hoff C, Poornoroozy PH, Razek P, Van Nieuwenhove Y
        Abstract
   ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Postoperative efficacy and safety of vessel sealing: an experimental study on carotid arteries of the pig.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Berdah SV, Hoff C, Poornoroozy PH, Razek P, Van Nieuwenhove Y</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The aim of this preclinical study was to analyze the burst pressure of large in vivo sealed vessels, not just immediately, but also in the first 7 postoperative days. METHODS: In 26 anesthetized pigs, the right carotid artery was sealed and cut using a novel device that integrates bipolar and ultrasonic energy. The animals were then awakened. They underwent a second surgical procedure after different follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 7 days: the left common carotid artery was sealed and cut in the same way as the contralateral artery. Perioperative and postoperative clinical events, evolution of burst pressure over time, and comparison between immediate and delayed burst pressure were analyzed. RESULTS: All sealings were successful. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. Median immediate (day 0) burst pressure was 949 mmHg (IQR 781-1181). Burst pressure decreased postoperatively but was never below 500 mmHg in any pig. CONCLUSION: Postoperative variations are observed in the burst pressure of in vivo sealed arteries. Immediate burst pressure alone should not be used for validating vascular sealing devices.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350233 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/postoperative-efficacy-and-safety-of-vessel-sealing-an-experimental-study-on-carotid-arteries-of-the-pig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of residual/local recurrent gastric neoplasms after previous endoscopic treatment.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/magnifying-endoscopy-for-diagnosis-of-residuallocal-recurrent-gastric-neoplasms-after-previous-endoscopic-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/magnifying-endoscopy-for-diagnosis-of-residuallocal-recurrent-gastric-neoplasms-after-previous-endoscopic-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of residual/local recurrent gastric neoplasms after previous endoscopic treatment.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Kosaka R, Tanaka K, Tano S, Takayama R, Nishikawa K, Hamada Y, Toyoda H...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of residual/local recurrent gastric neoplasms after previous endoscopic treatment.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kosaka R, Tanaka K, Tano S, Takayama R, Nishikawa K, Hamada Y, Toyoda H, Ninomiya K, Katsurahara M, Inoue H, Horiki N, Katayama N, Takei Y</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Incomplete resection of gastric neoplasms by endoscopic treatment could lead to residual/local recurrence, which may be difficult to identify. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for identifying and demarcating residual/local recurrent gastric neoplasms after endoscopic treatment. METHODS: Between December 2004 and November 2010, magnifying endoscopy was performed in 15 patients with residual/local recurrent gastric neoplasms. All patients underwent conventional magnifying endoscopy (CME) and enhanced-magnification endoscopy with acetic acid instillation (EME) after conventional endoscopy (CE). Eleven patients additionally underwent magnifying endoscopy using narrow-band imaging (NBI-ME) and a combination of narrow-band imaging and acetic acid instillation (NBI-EME). For each procedure, it was recorded whether the location and circumferential demarcation of the lesions were identified. All lesions were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. RESULTS: Eleven lesions were identified using CE. However, two and four additional lesions were identified using CME and EME, respectively. In 11 cases, NBI-ME and NBI-EME were performed and all lesions were identified. Three lesions, which were identified by CME, were not demarcated circumferentially. All 15 lesions were well demarcated by EME and 11 by NBI-ME and NBI-EME. Of the resected specimens, histopathology indicated that ten lesions were differentiated tubular adenocarcinomas and five lesions were adenomas. The histopathological diagnosis of the location and demarcation of all neoplasms corresponded to endoscopic findings. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy techniques (CME, EME, NBI-ME, and NBI-EME) may be useful for identifying and demarcating residual/local recurrent gastric neoplasms after previous endoscopic treatment.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350234 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/magnifying-endoscopy-for-diagnosis-of-residuallocal-recurrent-gastric-neoplasms-after-previous-endoscopic-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local treatment of pulmonary metastases: from open resection to minimally invasive approach? Less morbidity, comparable local control.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/local-treatment-of-pulmonary-metastases-from-open-resection-to-minimally-invasive-approach-less-morbidity-comparable-local-control/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/local-treatment-of-pulmonary-metastases-from-open-resection-to-minimally-invasive-approach-less-morbidity-comparable-local-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Local treatment of pulmonary metastases: from open resection to minimally invasive approach? Less morbidity, comparable local control.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  von Meyenfeldt EM, Wouters MW, Fat NL, Prevoo W, Burge...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Local treatment of pulmonary metastases: from open resection to minimally invasive approach? Less morbidity, comparable local control.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  von Meyenfeldt EM, Wouters MW, Fat NL, Prevoo W, Burgers SA, van Sandick JW, Klomp HM</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: The level of evidence for efficacy of local treatment of pulmonary metastases is low; therefore, complication rates should be minimized. Minimally invasive techniques may have the potential to reduce morbidity but potentially lead to more local and/or ipsilateral recurrences. The objective of this study was to evaluate the introduction of a new treatment strategy incorporating the increased use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), weighing complications against recurrence rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed results of all local treatment of pulmonary metastases in the Netherlands Cancer Institute from 2002 to 2007. Each of 158 identified interventions was analyzed separately to retrieve procedure-related data. Overall survival data were analyzed per patient. To evaluate the introduction of a strategy incorporating minimally invasive techniques, the study period was split in two (before and after the introduction of this strategy in July 2004). RESULTS: In Strategy I, 47 interventions (2 VATS, no RFA) were performed in 37 patients; in Strategy II 111 interventions (51 VATS and RFA) in 86 patients. Metastases of a variety of primary tumors were treated. Median hospital stay was shorter (5 vs. 7 days) and procedure-related morbidity was less with Strategy II (p &lt; 0.01). Time-to-recurrence rates were comparable (p = 0.18), as were local and ipsilateral recurrence rates within 3 years (p = 0.72). Estimated overall 3-year survival was 59% for patients treated with Strategy I and 54% with Strategy II. CONCLUSIONS: Increased use of minimally invasive techniques for local treatment of pulmonary metastatic disease is associated with low morbidity, without apparent reduction in (local) disease control.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350235 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/local-treatment-of-pulmonary-metastases-from-open-resection-to-minimally-invasive-approach-less-morbidity-comparable-local-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/review-of-surgical-robotics-user-interface-what-is-the-best-way-to-control-robotic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/review-of-surgical-robotics-user-interface-what-is-the-best-way-to-control-robotic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Simorov A, Otte RS, Kopietz CM, Oleynikov D
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: As surgical rob...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Simorov A, Otte RS, Kopietz CM, Oleynikov D</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: As surgical robots begin to occupy a larger place in operating rooms around the world, continued innovation is necessary to improve our outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive review of current surgical robotic user interfaces was performed to describe the modern surgical platforms, identify the benefits, and address the issues of feedback and limitations of visualization. RESULTS: Most robots currently used in surgery employ a master/slave relationship, with the surgeon seated at a work-console, manipulating the master system and visualizing the operation on a video screen. Although enormous strides have been made to advance current technology to the point of clinical use, limitations still exist. A lack of haptic feedback to the surgeon and the inability of the surgeon to be stationed at the operating table are the most notable examples. The future of robotic surgery sees a marked increase in the visualization technologies used in the operating room, as well as in the robots&#8217; abilities to convey haptic feedback to the surgeon. This will allow unparalleled sensation for the surgeon and almost eliminate inadvertent tissue contact and injury. CONCLUSIONS: A novel design for a user interface will allow the surgeon to have access to the patient bedside, remaining sterile throughout the procedure, employ a head-mounted three-dimensional visualization system, and allow the most intuitive master manipulation of the slave robot to date.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350236 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/review-of-surgical-robotics-user-interface-what-is-the-best-way-to-control-robotic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single versus multimodality training basic laparoscopic skills.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-versus-multimodality-training-basic-laparoscopic-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-versus-multimodality-training-basic-laparoscopic-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Single versus multimodality training basic laparoscopic skills.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Brinkman WM, Havermans SY, Buzink SN, Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ, Schoot BC
        Abstract
        INTRODUCTION: Even though ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Single versus multimodality training basic laparoscopic skills.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Brinkman WM, Havermans SY, Buzink SN, Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ, Schoot BC</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        INTRODUCTION: Even though literature provides compelling evidence of the value of simulators for training of basic laparoscopic skills, the best way to incorporate them into a surgical curriculum is unclear. This study compares the training outcome of single modality training with multimodality training of basic laparoscopic skills. METHODS: Thirty-six medical students without laparoscopic experience performed six training sessions of 45 min each, one per day, in which four different basic tasks were trained. Participants in the single-modality group (S) (n = 18) practiced solely on a virtual reality (VR) simulator. Participants in the multimodality group (M) (n = 18) practiced on the same VR simulator (2x), a box trainer (2x), and an augmented reality simulator (2x). All participants performed a pre-test and post-test on the VR simulator (the four basic tasks + one additional basic task). Halfway through the training protocol, both groups performed a salpingectomy on the VR simulator as interim test. RESULTS: Both groups improved their performance significantly (Wilcoxon signed-rank, P &lt; 0.05). The performances of group S and group M in the additional basic task and the salpingectomy did not differ significantly (Mann-Whitney U test, P &gt; 0.05). Group S performed the four basic tasks in the post-test on the VR faster than group M (P ≤ 0.05), which can be explained by the fact that they were much more familiar with these tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Training of basic laparoscopic tasks on single or multiple modalities does not result in different training outcome. Both training methods seem appropriate for the attainment of basic laparoscopic skills in future curricula.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350237 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/single-versus-multimodality-training-basic-laparoscopic-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-resection-of-gastric-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumors-gist-is-safe-and-effective-irrespective-of-tumor-size/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-resection-of-gastric-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumors-gist-is-safe-and-effective-irrespective-of-tumor-size/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  De Vogelaere K, Van Loo I, Peters O, Hoorens A, Haentjens P, Delv...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  De Vogelaere K, Van Loo I, Peters O, Hoorens A, Haentjens P, Delvaux G</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Feasibility and long-term safety of laparoscopic removal of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach is well established for lesions smaller than 2 cm. Our specific aim was to explore whether laparoscopic treatment is equally applicable for gastric GISTs larger than 2 cm. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2010, 31 consecutive patients presenting with a primary gastric GIST were scheduled for laparoscopic resection, irrespective of tumor size. Prerequisites for laparoscopic approach were the absence of metastases and the presence of a well-defined tumor on CT scanning without involvement of adjacent organs, the esophagogastric junction, or the pylorus of the stomach. Data were retrieved retrospectively from a prospectively collected database, including information on patient demographics, surgical procedure, complications, hospital stay, and recurrence. Diagnosis of GIST was based on microscopic analysis, including immunohistochemistry with a panel of antibodies: CD117, CD34, DOG1, S100, desmin, and smooth muscle actin. RESULTS: All 31 laparoscopic resections were carried out successfully. The most common symptoms were melena, anemia, and abdominal pain. In one case we performed a laparoscopic approach for a GIST with acute bleeding. Tumor size was smaller than 2 cm in 5 patients and larger than 2 cm in 26 patients. The median tumor size was 4.4 cm (range = 0.4-11.0 cm). Median blood loss was identical in both groups (20 ml), but duration of operation (60 vs. 103 min) and duration of hospital stay (6 vs. 8 days) were lower when tumor size was less than 2 cm. Only one patient (with tumor size &lt;2 cm) experienced a postoperative hemorrhage. After a median follow-up of 52 months, there were no recurrences or metastases. CONCLUSION: The low morbidity rates and the long-term disease-free interval of 100% observed in our cohort indicate that laparoscopic resection is safe and effective in treating gastric GISTs, even for tumors larger than 2 cm.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350238 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-resection-of-gastric-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumors-gist-is-safe-and-effective-irrespective-of-tumor-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Validation of a new box trainer-related tracking device: the TrEndo.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/validation-of-a-new-box-trainer-related-tracking-device-the-trendo/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/validation-of-a-new-box-trainer-related-tracking-device-the-trendo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Validation of a new box trainer-related tracking device: the TrEndo.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  van Empel PJ, van Rijssen LB, Commandeur JP, Verdam MG, Huirne JA, Scheele F, Jaap Bonjer H, Jeroen Meijerink W
        ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Validation of a new box trainer-related tracking device: the TrEndo.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  van Empel PJ, van Rijssen LB, Commandeur JP, Verdam MG, Huirne JA, Scheele F, Jaap Bonjer H, Jeroen Meijerink W</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: There is an increasing demand for structured objective ex vivo training and assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills prior to implementation of these skills in practice. The aim of this study was to establish the internal validity of the TrEndo, a motion-tracking device, for implementation on a laparoscopic box trainer. METHODS: Face validity and content validity were addressed through a structured questionnaire. To assess construct validity, participants were divided into an expert group and a novice group and performed two basic laparoscopic tasks. The TrEndo recorded five motion analysis parameters (MAPs) and time. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated a high regard for face and content validity. All recorded MAPs differed significantly between experts and novices after performing a square knot. Overall, the TrEndo correctly assigned group membership in 84.7 and 95.7% of cases based on two laparoscopic tasks. CONCLUSION: Face, content, and construct validities of the TrEndo were established. The TrEndo holds real potential as a (home) training device.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350239 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/validation-of-a-new-box-trainer-related-tracking-device-the-trendo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/trend-variability-and-outcome-of-open-vs-laparoscopic-appendectomy-based-on-a-large-administrative-database/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/trend-variability-and-outcome-of-open-vs-laparoscopic-appendectomy-based-on-a-large-administrative-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, Callegaro G, Sandonà P, Mantoan D, Baldo V
     ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, Callegaro G, Sandonà P, Mantoan D, Baldo V</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        The aim of this study was to ascertain the variability and 9-year trends in the use of laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis using data from a large administrative database, to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy, and to ascertain whether different choices of surgical approach stem from evidence-based recommendations. This was a retrospective cohort study based on administrative data collected from 2000 to 2008 in the Veneto Region (northeastern Italy). Funnel plots were used to display variability between local health units (LHUs). A total of 38,314 appendectomies were performed from 2000 to 2008 in the Veneto Region, 53% of them in males. The laparoscopic procedure was used more often for females than for males of fertile age. There was a significant rising linear trend in the use of LA, with a higher increment among females. The overall regional standardized appendectomy rate was 82.9/10,000. The mean proportion of LAs (27.3%) ranged from 2.8 to 59.4% at different LHUs, and there was no relationship between the volume of procedures undertaken and the proportion of LAs. The proportion of LAs performed in females of reproductive age also varied considerably, on no apparent evidence-based grounds. The analysis of aggregate clinical data is a powerful tool for supporting regional health management units in efforts to improve the quality of medical care and assess the appropriateness of therapeutic or diagnostic approaches in the light of practical guidelines. Variability in the treatment of a given disease that lacks any evidence-based justification remains an important issue in national health systems.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350240 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/trend-variability-and-outcome-of-open-vs-laparoscopic-appendectomy-based-on-a-large-administrative-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectiveness and safety of minilaparoscopy-guided spleen biopsy: a retrospective series of 57 cases.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/effectiveness-and-safety-of-minilaparoscopy-guided-spleen-biopsy-a-retrospective-series-of-57-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/effectiveness-and-safety-of-minilaparoscopy-guided-spleen-biopsy-a-retrospective-series-of-57-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Effectiveness and safety of minilaparoscopy-guided spleen biopsy: a retrospective series of 57 cases.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Werner T, Koch J, Frenzel C, Lohse AW, Denzer UW
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: M...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effectiveness and safety of minilaparoscopy-guided spleen biopsy: a retrospective series of 57 cases.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Werner T, Koch J, Frenzel C, Lohse AW, Denzer UW</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Minilaparoscopy is an accepted method for liver biopsy. We report our experience with minilaparoscopy for splenic biopsy. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all minilaparoscopy procedures performed from 1996 to 2004 at the University of Mainz Medical Center and from 2005 to mid-2011 at the University of Hamburg Medical Center to identify patients who underwent a minilaparoscopy-guided splenic biopsy. All procedures were performed using the previously described method (2.75-mm trocar, 2.3-mm Veress needle, 1.9-mm laparoscope) with the patient under conscious sedation (midazolam/meperidine/propofol). Splenic biopsies were performed using a second trocar with an 18-G Tru-Cut needle. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and/or fibrin glue (FG) were used to control postbiopsy bleeding. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent minilaparoscopy-guided biopsy of the spleen (27 females, 30 males; median age = 41 years, range = 16-76). A specimen suitable for histopathologic evaluation was obtained in all patients. Grouped by preprocedure indication, a definitive diagnosis was obtained in 70% (7/10) of patients who had splenic mass lesions in prior imaging (3 B-NHL, 2 hemangioma, 1 tuberculosis, 1 sarcoidosis; p &lt; 0.01) compared to 29% (10/34) in the group with unexplained fever or suspected lymphoma (3 tuberculosis, 2 B-NHL, 1 hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, 1 sarcoidosis, 1 Still&#8217;s disease, 1 EBV, 1 Q-fever) and 0/13 with unexplained splenomegaly. Focal lesions noted at laparoscopy yielded to a histologic diagnosis in 38% (11/29) of 42 patients compared to 21% (6/28) without laparoscopic abnormality (p = 0.25). Bleeding from the biopsy site was noted in 96.5% (55/57) and was classified as brisk in 9. Control of hemorrhage was achieved in all patients (APC: 47, FG: 1, APC/FG: 7). There was no postprocedure bleeding or other complications. CONCLUSION: Splenic biopsy guided by minilaparoscopy can be performed safely. Postprocedure bleeding is readily controlled with APC with or without fibrin glue. The highest diagnostic yield is in patients with focal splenic lesions.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350241 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/effectiveness-and-safety-of-minilaparoscopy-guided-spleen-biopsy-a-retrospective-series-of-57-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/guidelines-for-laparoscopic-tapp-and-endoscopic-tep-treatment-of-inguinal-hernia/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/guidelines-for-laparoscopic-tapp-and-endoscopic-tep-treatment-of-inguinal-hernia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Köckerling F, Jacob DA, Lomanto D, Chowbey P
        PMID: 22350242 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Köckerling F, Jacob DA, Lomanto D, Chowbey P</p>
<p>PMID: 22350242 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/guidelines-for-laparoscopic-tapp-and-endoscopic-tep-treatment-of-inguinal-hernia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conscious monitoring and control (reinvestment) in surgical performance under pressure.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/conscious-monitoring-and-control-reinvestment-in-surgical-performance-under-pressure/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/conscious-monitoring-and-control-reinvestment-in-surgical-performance-under-pressure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Conscious monitoring and control (reinvestment) in surgical performance under pressure.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Malhotra N, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Ngo K, Masters RS
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Research on...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Conscious monitoring and control (reinvestment) in surgical performance under pressure.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Malhotra N, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Ngo K, Masters RS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Research on intraoperative stressors has focused on external factors without considering individual differences in the ability to cope with stress. One individual difference that is implicated in adverse effects of stress on performance is &#8220;reinvestment,&#8221; the propensity for conscious monitoring and control of movements. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of reinvestment on laparoscopic performance under time pressure. METHODS: Thirty-one medical students (surgery rotation) were divided into high- and low-reinvestment groups. Participants were first trained to proficiency on a peg transfer task and then tested on the same task in a control and time pressure condition. Outcome measures included generic performance and process measures. Stress levels were assessed using heart rate and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). RESULTS: High and low reinvestors demonstrated increased anxiety levels from control to time pressure conditions as indicated by their STAI scores, although no differences in heart rate were found. Low reinvestors performed significantly faster when under time pressure, whereas high reinvestors showed no change in performance times. Low reinvestors tended to display greater performance efficiency (shorter path lengths, fewer hand movements) than high reinvestors. CONCLUSION: Trained medical students with a high individual propensity to consciously monitor and control their movements (high reinvestors) displayed less capability (than low reinvestors) to meet the demands imposed by time pressure during a laparoscopic task. The finding implies that the propensity for reinvestment may have a moderating effect on laparoscopic performance under time pressure.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350243 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/conscious-monitoring-and-control-reinvestment-in-surgical-performance-under-pressure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-common-bile-duct-exploration-versus-open-surgery-comparative-prospective-randomized-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-common-bile-duct-exploration-versus-open-surgery-comparative-prospective-randomized-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors:  Grubnik VV, Tkachenko AI, Ilyashenko VV, Vorotyntseva KO
        Abstract
        Th...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors:  Grubnik VV, Tkachenko AI, Ilyashenko VV, Vorotyntseva KO</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        The aim of the study was to analyse safety and benefits of laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration compared to open. Prospective randomized trial included a total of 256 patients with CBD stones operated from 2005 to 2009 years in a single center. There were two groups of patients: group I-laparoscopic CBD exploration (138 patients), group II-open CBD exploration (118 patients). Patient comorbidity was assessed by means of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score; i.e. ASA II-109 patients, ASA III-59 patients. Bile duct stones were visualized preoperatively by means of US examination in 129 patients, by means of ERCP in 26 patients, by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 72 patients. Preoperative evaluation was done through medical history, biochemical tests and ultrasonography. There was no statistical significant difference between 2 groups of patients. No mortality occurred. The mean duration of laparoscopic operations was 82 min (range, 40-160 min). The mean duration of open operations were 90 min (range, 60-150 min). Mean blood loss was much less in laparoscopic group than in open group (20±2 vs. 285±27 ml; p &lt; 0.01). Postoperative complications were observed is nine patients of laparoscopic group and in 15 patients in open group (p &lt; 0.01). There were 102 attempts to perform transcystic exploration of CBD. External drainage was used in 25 (32.8%) patients with transcystic approach. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in two patients. Open operations were performed in 118 patients with choledocholithiasis. External drainage was used in 85% of patients. Morbidity in open group was higher (12.7%) than in laparoscopic group (6.5%). Laparoscopic CBD exploration can be performed with high efficiency, minimal morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic procedures have advances over open operations in terms of postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22350244 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/laparoscopic-common-bile-duct-exploration-versus-open-surgery-comparative-prospective-randomized-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALS) Cardiff, United Kingdom, 17-18 November 2011 Scientific Papers.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/association-of-laparoscopic-surgeons-of-great-britain-and-ireland-als-cardiff-united-kingdom-17-18-november-2011-scientific-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/association-of-laparoscopic-surgeons-of-great-britain-and-ireland-als-cardiff-united-kingdom-17-18-november-2011-scientific-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALS) Cardiff, United Kingdom, 17-18 November 2011 Scientific Papers.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350245 [PubMed - as supplied by publi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALS) Cardiff, United Kingdom, 17-18 November 2011 Scientific Papers.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350245 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/association-of-laparoscopic-surgeons-of-great-britain-and-ireland-als-cardiff-united-kingdom-17-18-november-2011-scientific-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350246 [PubMed - as supplied...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350246 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EURO-NOTES 2011, 5th Joint European Notes Workshop Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 22-24 September 2011.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/euro-notes-2011-5th-joint-european-notes-workshop-frankfurt-am-main-germany-22-24-september-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/euro-notes-2011-5th-joint-european-notes-workshop-frankfurt-am-main-germany-22-24-september-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        EURO-NOTES 2011, 5th Joint European Notes Workshop Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 22-24 September 2011.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350247 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>EURO-NOTES 2011, 5th Joint European Notes Workshop Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 22-24 September 2011.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350247 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/euro-notes-2011-5th-joint-european-notes-workshop-frankfurt-am-main-germany-22-24-september-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Oral Presentations.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-oral-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-oral-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Oral Presentations.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350248 [PubMed - as supplied by publ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Oral Presentations.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350248 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-oral-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Poster Presentations.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-poster-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-poster-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Poster Presentations.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350249 [PubMed - as supplied by pu...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Poster Presentations.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350249 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-poster-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Video Presentations.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-video-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-video-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Video Presentations.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350250 [PubMed - as supplied by pub...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>19th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Torino, Italy, 15-18 June 2011 Video Presentations.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350250 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/19th-international-congress-of-the-european-association-for-endoscopic-surgery-eaes-torino-italy-15-18-june-2011-video-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012 : Posters of Distinction.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-posters-of-distinction/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-posters-of-distinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012 : Posters of Distinction.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012 : Posters of Distinction.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350251 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-posters-of-distinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22350252 [PubMed - as supplied...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 21;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22350252 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramosetron, dexamethasone, and their combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/ramosetron-dexamethasone-and-their-combination-for-the-prevention-of-postoperative-nausea-and-vomiting-in-women-undergoing-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/ramosetron-dexamethasone-and-their-combination-for-the-prevention-of-postoperative-nausea-and-vomiting-in-women-undergoing-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Ramosetron, dexamethasone, and their combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;
        Authors:  Jo YY, Lee JW, Shim JK, Lee WK, Ch...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Ramosetron, dexamethasone, and their combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;</p>
<p>Authors:  Jo YY, Lee JW, Shim JK, Lee WK, Choi YS</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: In this randomized and controlled study, we evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of ramosetron combined with dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared with that of dexamethasone or ramosetron alone in women who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: One hundred twenty female patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive antiemetics as follows: ramosetron 0.3 mg (group R), dexamethasone 8 mg (group D), or ramosetron 0.3 mg combined with dexamethasone 8 mg (group RD). PONV, postoperative pain intensity, rescue antiemetics requirement, and side effects were assessed at 0-6, 6-12, and 12-24 h after surgery. RESULTS: The ratio of complete response (no PONV and no rescue antiemetic) was higher at 6-12 h in groups R and RD than in group D (p &lt; 0.05) and at 12-24 h in group RD than in group D (p &lt; 0.05). The incidence of nausea was lower at 6-12 h in groups R (p = 0.043) and RD (p = 0.003) compared to group D and at 12-24 h in group RD (p = 0.01) compared to group D. The severity of nausea was also significantly reduced at 6-12 h in groups R and RD compared to group D (p &lt; 0.05). There were no clinically serious adverse events related to the studied drugs. CONCLUSION: Antiemetic efficacy of the combination of ramosetron 0.3 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg for PONV was most superior, with 93% of the patients showing complete response at 12-24 h after surgery followed by ramosetron alone and dexamethasone alone.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22358123 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/ramosetron-dexamethasone-and-their-combination-for-the-prevention-of-postoperative-nausea-and-vomiting-in-women-undergoing-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intramural acellular porcine dermal matrix (APDM)-assisted gastrotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/intramural-acellular-porcine-dermal-matrix-apdm-assisted-gastrotomy-closure-for-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/intramural-acellular-porcine-dermal-matrix-apdm-assisted-gastrotomy-closure-for-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Intramural acellular porcine dermal matrix (APDM)-assisted gastrotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;
        Authors:  Gopal J, Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Moyer MT, Mathew A
 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Intramural acellular porcine dermal matrix (APDM)-assisted gastrotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;</p>
<p>Authors:  Gopal J, Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Moyer MT, Mathew A</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: A highly reliable and safe means of gastric closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has yet to be developed. The authors have previously described the self-approximating transluminal access technique (STAT) as a means for gastrotomy closure in transgastric surgery. It has yet to be determined whether biologic mesh can be utilized in facilitating gastrotomy closure via STAT. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of implanting an acellular porcine dermal matrix (LifeCell) into the STAT tunnel and investigate whether it will become incorporated into the submucosal plane of the STAT tunnel. METHODS: Five pigs underwent transgastric left uterine horn resection utilizing STAT. For closure, the acellular porcine dermal matrix was implanted within the submucosal plane, occluding the seromuscular incision. The mucosal incision was then closed over the matrix with endoscopically placed clips. Necropsy was performed after a 3 week survival period. Histopathological evaluation of the tunnel and matrix was performed. RESULTS: The matrix was successfully implanted in all five animals. Average OR time was 151 ± 68 min. Average time to anchor and embed the matrix within the tunnel was 4 ± 1 and 9 ± 12 min, respectively. There was one duodenal perforation related to a balloon occlusion device. Postoperative course was unremarkable; the average weight gain at 3 weeks was 22 ± 5 lbs. On necropsy, one animal had some protrusion of the matrix at the serotomy, with adhesions to small bowel and liver. Histopathology revealed one clinically insignificant microabscess but otherwise demonstrated local inflammation and fibrovascular ingrowth into the matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The porcine dermal matrix can be successfully implanted within the gastric submucosal plane and evidence of incorporation into the gastric wall by 3 weeks was demonstrated.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22358124 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/intramural-acellular-porcine-dermal-matrix-apdm-assisted-gastrotomy-closure-for-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-surgery-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012 Oral Presentations.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-oral-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-oral-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PubMed: "surgical endoscopy"...</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012 Oral Presentations.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;
        Authors: 
        PMID: 22358125 [P...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Diego, California, USA, 7-10 March 2012 Oral Presentations.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>PMID: 22358125 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/2012-scientific-session-of-the-society-of-american-gastrointestinal-and-endoscopic-surgeons-sages-san-diego-california-usa-7-10-march-2012-oral-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcome of laparoscopic major liver resection for colorectal metastases.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-laparoscopic-major-liver-resection-for-colorectal-metastases/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-laparoscopic-major-liver-resection-for-colorectal-metastases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Outcome of laparoscopic major liver resection for colorectal metastases.
        Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;
        Authors:  Topal H, Tiek J, Aerts R, Topal B
        Abstract
        BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) for...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Outcome of laparoscopic major liver resection for colorectal metastases.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb 23;</p>
<p>Authors:  Topal H, Tiek J, Aerts R, Topal B</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is gaining widespread acceptance. However, data are still lacking on the feasibility, long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic major hepatectomy (i.e., three or more liver segments). METHODS: Between October 2002 and December 2008, prospectively collected data of 117 patients who underwent major liver resection [97 open (OMLR) and 20 laparoscopic (LMLR) procedures] for CRLM were analyzed. Twenty patients in the LMLR group were matched with 20 patients of the OMLR based on 13 parameters. We compared the long- and short-term outcomes between these two groups. RESULTS: Median duration of surgery was 257.5 (range 75-360) min in LMLR versus 232.5 (range 120-400) min in OMLR (P = 0.228). Median blood loss during surgery was 550 ml in each group (range 100-4,000 vs. 100-2,500 ml, P = 0.884). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications (both severity and location). Median magnitude of tumor-free resection margin was 7.5 versus 5.5 mm in the laparoscopy versus open group, respectively (P = 0.651). Median disease-free survival (DFS) of the entire study population was 18.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.9-50.0 months]. Median overall survival (OS) was 50.7 months (95% CI 36.2 months to undetermined). The estimated DFS and OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were comparable in the two groups (P = 0.637 and 0.872, respectively). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic MLR for selected CRLM is feasible and might result in comparable oncologic outcomes as in open liver resection.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 22358126 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/outcome-of-laparoscopic-major-liver-resection-for-colorectal-metastases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/effect-of-training-and-instrument-type-on-performance-in-single-incision-laparoscopy-results-of-a-randomized-comparison-using-a-surgical-simulator/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/effect-of-training-and-instrument-type-on-performance-in-single-incision-laparoscopy-results-of-a-randomized-comparison-using-a-surgical-simulator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randomized Controlled Trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3798-804
        Authors:  Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3798-804</p>
<p>Authors:  Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ, Hungness ES</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        PURPOSE: Single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) is potentially less invasive compared with standard laparoscopic surgery (LAP); however, it may be more technically challenging and have a longer learning curve. A two-phase study was conducted to examine the performance of standardized tasks on a surgical simulator by novices during a distributed training period. Phase 1 examined the effect of LAP-specific or SIL-specific training on skill acquisition for both techniques. Phase 2 compared the effectiveness and learning curves of additional instrument types for SIL (straight [STR] vs. dynamic articulating [D-ART]).<br/><br />
        METHODS: Medical students without previous surgical experience were randomized to LAP-specific training or SIL-specific training, using static articulating instruments [S-ART] for SIL. LAP and SIL scores on the peg transfer (PEG) and pattern cutting (CIRCLE) tasks from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) were measured at baseline and after four training sessions. In phase 2, a new group of subjects were randomized to SIL training using STR or D-ART instruments, with similar baseline and post-training testing. FLS task scores were calculated and compared according to training regimen and instrument type.<br/><br />
        RESULTS: Forty-five subjects completed the study. All scores improved significantly during the training period. Improvement in LAP score was similar between LAP-trained and SIL-trained groups. Improvement of SIL score was better for the SIL-trained group. Final scores were better and the learning curve was shorter for LAP versus SIL technique, with no differences in SIL scores according to instrument type.<br/><br />
        CONCLUSIONS: LAP technique results in superior task performance with a shorter learning curve compared with SIL technique during a standardized training period. SIL-specific simulator training is better than LAP training alone to improve SIL performance. Neither S-ART nor D-ART instruments for SIL are associated with improved performance or shorter learning curve compared with STR instruments.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 21647813 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/effect-of-training-and-instrument-type-on-performance-in-single-incision-laparoscopy-results-of-a-randomized-comparison-using-a-surgical-simulator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduces bowel gas volume but does not affect visual analogue scale scores of suffering: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/carbon-dioxide-insufflation-during-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-reduces-bowel-gas-volume-but-does-not-affect-visual-analogue-scale-scores-of-suffering-a-prospective-double-blind-r/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/carbon-dioxide-insufflation-during-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-reduces-bowel-gas-volume-but-does-not-affect-visual-analogue-scale-scores-of-suffering-a-prospective-double-blind-r/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randomized Controlled Trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduces bowel gas volume but does not affect visual analogue scale scores of suffering: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
        Surg...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduces bowel gas volume but does not affect visual analogue scale scores of suffering: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3784-90</p>
<p>Authors:  Kuwatani M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Kudo T, Yamato H, Ehira N, Haba S, Eto K, Kato M, Asaka M</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and related procedures can cause abdominal pain and discomfort. Two clinical trials have indicated, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, that CO(2) insufflation during ERCP ameliorates the suffering of patients without complications, compared with air insufflation. However, differences in patient suffering between CO(2) and air insufflation after ERCP under deep conscious sedation have not been reported. We focused on the gas volume score (GVS) as an objective indicator of gas volume, and designed a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study with CO(2) and air insufflation during ERCP.<br/><br />
        METHODS: Between March 2010 and August 2010, 80 patients who required ERCP were enrolled and evenly randomized to receive CO(2) insufflation (CO(2) group) or air insufflation (air group). ERCP and related procedures were performed under deep conscious sedation with fentanyl citrate or pethidine and midazolam or diazepam. The GVS was evaluated as the primary endpoint in addition to the VAS score as the secondary endpoint.<br/><br />
        RESULTS: The GVS after ERCP and related procedures in the CO(2) group was significantly lower than that in the air group (0.14 ± 0.06 vs. 0.31 ± 0.11, P &lt; 0.01), as well as the rate of increase in GVS ([GVS after - GVS before]/[GVS before ERCP and related procedures] × 100) (3.8 ± 5.9 vs. 21 ± 11.1%, P &lt; 0.01). VAS scores 3 and 24 h after ERCP and related procedures were comparable between the CO(2) and air groups for abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and nausea. Additionally, VAS scores were not correlated with the GVS.<br/><br />
        CONCLUSIONS: CO(2) insufflation during ERCP reduces GVS (bowel gas volume) but not the VAS score of suffering compared with air insufflation. Deep and sufficient sedation during ERCP and related procedures is important for the palliation of patients&#8217; pain and discomfort.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 21656068 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/carbon-dioxide-insufflation-during-endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography-reduces-bowel-gas-volume-but-does-not-affect-visual-analogue-scale-scores-of-suffering-a-prospective-double-blind-r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial.</title>
		<link>http://jsurg.com/blog/bowel-obstruction-after-laparoscopic-and-open-colon-resection-for-cancer-results-of-5-years-of-follow-up-in-a-randomized-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://jsurg.com/blog/bowel-obstruction-after-laparoscopic-and-open-colon-resection-for-cancer-results-of-5-years-of-follow-up-in-a-randomized-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randomized Controlled Trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surg Endosc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
        Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3755-60
        Authors:  Schölin J, Buunen M, Hop W, Bonjer J, Anderberg ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/></tr>
</table>
<p><b>Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial.</b></p>
<p>Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3755-60</p>
<p>Authors:  Schölin J, Buunen M, Hop W, Bonjer J, Anderberg B, Cuesta M, Delgado S, Ibarzabal A, Ivarsson ML, Janson M, Lacy A, Lange J, Påhlman L, Skullman S, Haglind E</p>
<p>Abstract<br/><br />
        BACKGROUND: Postoperative bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions occurs after all types of abdominal surgery. It has been suggested that the laparoscopic technique should reduce the risk for adhesion formation and thus for postoperative bowel obstruction. This study was designed to compare the incidence of bowel obstruction in a randomized trial where laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer was compared.<br/><br />
        METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed, collecting data of episodes of bowel obstruction with or without surgery. Only episodes treated in the hospital where the index surgery took place were included. Data for 786 patients were collected for the 5-year period after cancer surgery.<br/><br />
        RESULTS: Baseline characteristics for the evaluated laparoscopic (n = 383) and open (n = 403) groups were comparable. The cumulative obstruction percentages at 5 years for the open and laparoscopic groups were 6.5 and 5.1% respectively and did not significantly differ from each other. Tumor stage seemed to influence the risk for bowel obstruction: 2.8% in stage I, 6.6% in stage II, and 7% in stage III, but the differences were not significant.<br/><br />
        CONCLUSIONS: This analysis does not support the hypothesis that laparoscopy leads to fewer episodes of bowel obstruction compared with open surgery.<br/>
        </p>
<p>PMID: 21667207 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsurg.com/blog/bowel-obstruction-after-laparoscopic-and-open-colon-resection-for-cancer-results-of-5-years-of-follow-up-in-a-randomized-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

